Summary Of 'The Controversy In My Papa's Waltz'

714 Words2 Pages

“My Papa’s Waltz” is a poem gracefully written by the critically acclaimed, Theodore Roethke, in which he projects his internalized emotional confusion through the innocent soul of a young boy, whose thoughts most likely reflect that of Roethke’s former childhood self. The account expressed in the poem is one of controversy, occurring between the young boy and his father; the encounter is either abusive or playful; however, much of the poem supports the position that the encounter is playful. In “My Papa’s Waltz,” the child is not the victim of abuse, but rather of playfulness, which resulted in unintended emotional scarring from the combination of the enamor he had for his father as a consummate whole, and the dislike he had for the part of …show more content…

It is apparent in many of the stanzas contained in Roethke’s “My Papa’s Waltz,” that the relationship between the boy and his father is playful. Moreover, the boy appears to understand his father’s drunken clumsiness, in such lines as the following: “At every step you missed / My right ear scraped a buckle” (11, 12). The fact that the boy states that “a buckle” instead of his father’s “buckle” did him harm, suggests that he is refraining from placing the onus upon his father and blaming him for abuse. Why would a child in a position comparable to the one in “My Papa’s Waltz” refrain from blaming a loved one for abuse? The answer to this question is simply a matter of biology, for a young boy is fragile compared to a powerful fully-grown male. When romping occurs between the former and the latter, especially when inebriated and unable to accurately coordinate his movements with a desired amount of force, the adult may inflict an extremely slight degree of pain upon the young receiver-too slight to be considered abusive. Since the inebriated father in “My Papa’s Waltz,” as I affirm, was playing with his young son, then the combination of disproportionate physical force and the enjoyment the two seemed to be having created a feeling of confusion within the boy; like how one may feel when another says to them, “I love you,” and smites them …show more content…

In addition, Roethke’s father worked in a greenhouse, which involves laborious work that causes one’s palm to be “caked hard by dirt,” (14). Thence, if based on verifiable evidence, then the poem and the conclusions I draw from it in relation to Roethke’s childhood are true. Duly, the statement regarding the fatherly figures in Roethke’s works allows one to conclude that the father in “My Papa’s Waltz” must necessarily embody the author’s actual father, and likewise, that the boy in the poem represents Roethke’s former childhood

Open Document