Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essay Annotated Bibliography Criminal and Non-Criminal Psychopathy
Psychopathy thesis
Investigation of psychopathy
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Robert D. Hare’s book Without Conscience: The Disturbing World of Psychopaths Among Us focuses on psychopathy in our society. In the book, the author highlights the characteristics of psychopaths in a simple manner that are understandable to an everyday reader. Psychopaths are individuals who are deceitful and manipulative and they don’t care who they hurt. Hare points out his personal experience with psychopath in prison that eventually lead him to create The Psychopathy Checklist-Revised. In the Checklist, Hare emphasizes characteristics that makes someone a psychopath such as “shallow emotions, deceitful and manipulative behavior, lack of guilt, lack of empathy, impulsiveness, poor behavior control, lack of responsibility, need for excitement, early behavior problems, glib and grandiose behavior” (Hare 1993, p. 34). The author employs detailed interviews and a close study of psychopaths to research and create an instrument that could help detect psychopathy. In the book, Hare goes further to provide …show more content…
In many junctions throughout the book, the author reiterated the importance of Psychopathy Checklist-Revised and how vital it was to a psychopath’s diagnoses. While the author made convincing points in the book for the checklist, the author, himself, created the Psychopathy Checklist-Revised based on his research and experiments. So, the fact that he was pointing back to his own research repeatedly didn’t add confidence to the information given. It only made his opinion on the topic appear bias. Also, in the book the author mentioned the other tests as being less reliable at identifying psychopath “…criminals were able to fake the results of psychological test” (Hare,1993, p. 31). Because the author was the creator of the Psychology Checklist-Revised, he was bashing other psychological tests while making his own seem
REVIEW OF DANIEL GOLDHAGEN’S ‘A MORAL RECKONING: THE ROLE OF THE CATHOLIC CHURCH IN THE HOLOCAUST AND ITS UNFULLFILLED DUTY OF REPAIR’
This starts with a man named David Shayler. Everyone who knew or knew of David Shayler believed that he was a great man. They believed that he had few to no flaws, and they were certain that he wasn’t a psychopath. David was an MI5 spy, code-named G9A/1, “He had been at an interagency meeting where an MI6 officer, code-named PT16B, had announced a plan to covertly assassinate the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group. (Page 187)” David was an esteemed spy for the British. If he had been presumed as a psychopath, he would not have been in that position. This shows how although someone is certain of something, there is a lot of doubt that comes along with it. David was later found to be a psychopath based on the Bob Hare checklist. The Bob Hare Checklist is a list of twenty items that are scored from 0-2 and added up. If your score is 30 or above then you are deemed a
...Essay I have identified within the confines of my understanding firstly, what it means to be mentally ill and secondly what it means to be ‘Evil’. Therefore I would like to amend the original statement from “The psychopath is not mentally ill; he is evil.” To, Psychopathy is a biological difference and therefore cannot be defined as a mental illness; however that is not to say that psychopathic people cannot develop mental illnesses. Secondly, while psychopathic can be defined under both Hobbesian and Christian theology as generically evil, there label is dependent on how a society deems them to be.
There have been many studies on what behaviors constitute psychopathy. Various Studies have shown that an individual’s behavior must include actions such as hostility to animals or people, ruin to possessions, dishonesty or larceny, and grave violations of rules, as well as a clinically defined impairment of an individual’s social, educational, or employment-related purposes. In order for an individual to be found to be presenting such a disorder, he or she must present with a minimum of at least one of the previous mention behaviors in the past six months, or three plus in a twelve-month timeframe (Mueller III, 2012). Individuals present with psychopathic propensity or psychopathy have a tendency to have a decreased aptitude to name apprehensive facial expressions and a frightened vocal change. An out of...
The entire book is told from the view of Robert D. Hare, PhD., a psychologist and researcher of psychopathy. Hare decided to write this book to shed light on the many psychopaths that live among all of us from day to day. Hare does this by using evidence from case studies, stories told to him, and the private meetings he had with the psychopaths that he has met along the way. Hare’s account was an excellent read because he was very modest, even admitting to being fooled by some of the psychopaths he encountered, which made him seem more like a real person. The mind of a psychopath is still far from being explained, however Hare feels the best way to figure out a psychopath operates is to stop them before they are able to cause any damage. Doing so, victims would not be harmed; mentally and physically, saving tax payers money due to court costs, rehabilitation and parole programs that simply don’t work.
In this essay I will consider the objections to Virtue Ethics (VE) raised by Robert Louden in his article entitled On Some Vices of Virtue Ethics which was published in 1984. It is important to note at the outset of this essay that it was not until 1991 that the v-rules came up in literature. So Louden is assuming throughout his article that the only action guidance that VE can give is “Do what the virtuous agent would do in the circumstances.” I will be addressing Louden’s objections with the benefit of knowing about the v-rules. First of all, let us discuss what VE is. VE is a normative ethical theory that emphasises the virtues or moral character, thus it focuses on the moral agent. It differs from Deontology which emphasises duties or rules, and Utilitarianism which emphasises the consequences of our actions.
Finger (2011), Ermer (2012), and Yang (2010) were all interested in how abnormalities in certain areas of the brain (amygdale, orbitalfrontal cortex, etc.) affected or led to certain characteristics in psychopaths. Finger studied the system of decision-making in psychopaths, Ermer researched the link between damage in certain regions of the brain are what causes the traits of psychopathology, and Yang wanted to see if the amount and thickness of certain areas of the brain had anything to do with the psychopaths being able to live among others undetected. All three studies linked certain areas in the brain that are thought to either help in emotional learning or decision-making to their explanation that abnormalities in these area are responsible for psychotic traits.
One area of research in psychopathy focuses on the set of structures in the brain known as the limbic system, but more specifically on a structure known as the amygdala. According to neuropsychology class slides, the amygdala is involved in emotions and storage of emotions in memory as well as the fear response when encountering threatening environmental stimuli. Osumi and colleagues (2012) note that the affective and interpersonal facets of psychopathy, such as cold-heartedness and lack of empathy, which are thought to be the core features of psychopathy, are associated with reduced activity in the amygdala. This is coupled with the fact that a less functional amygdala is associated with a psychopathic individual’s exhibition of antisocial behaviors, at least in part because he will not perceive the threat of punishment as a consequence of his actions. So whether it be the acts against other people or the acts of justice that may be carried out against the perpetrator, the psychopath will perceive both as less significant, as compared to a non-psychopathic individual. (Osumi et al., 2012)
There are nearly two million psychopaths in North America, and these people are not murderers. They 're our friends, lovers and co-workers. They 're outgoing and persuasive, dazzling you with charm and flattery. Often you aren 't even aware they 've taken you for a ride -- until it 's too late. Psychopaths exhibit a Jekyll and Hyde personality. "They play a part so they can get what they want," says Dr. Sheila Wilson, a Toronto psychologist who has helped victims of psychopaths (CITE). For example, the guy who showers a woman with excessive attention is much more capable of getting her to lend him money, and to put up with him when he strays along with the new employee who gains her co-workers ' trust has more access to their checkbooks. And so on. Psychopaths have no conscience and their only goal is
...res of the psychopaths and gives the reader various examples of these individuals playing out these characteristics in everyday life. A widely used checklist is provided so the reader can get a wide spanning view of what is accounted for when scoring a psychopath. This form of research is very important within the deceitfulness of this population; it allows the professional to ignore their words and examine their actions. Hare made it clear that it is not uncommon for there to be an emotional and verbal disconnect from their actions. With virtually no emotional functioning psychopaths feel no remorse for the offenses that they commit and it is very important that we work towards using the opportunities we have to study and assist these populations; not only for them but for ourselves.
Psychopaths. Vicious social predators who charm, deceive, and manipulate. They hammer their way through life leaving a long trail of broken promises, empty wallets, shattered expectations, and flustered victims. Utterly deficient in conscience and empathy they greedily seize what they want and do as they wish, violating laws and social norms without the slightest trace of remorse. The psychopath’s trade mark is a stunning lack of conscience; his thrill is self- gratification at the expense of others. Many are locked in prison, but many more roam free (“Focus…”). Together, these traits form an image of an arrogant, callous, and remorseless person short of empathy and the ability to form heartfelt relationships with others, a person who operates without the restraints imposed by a moral compass (Hare 15). If pondered on, one will realize that what is lacking is the very elements that devise our human essence.
...ny requirements for a psychopath, even though a formal test like the PCL-R cannot be completed because he took away his own life before investigation was final. However, he is similar to a few psychopaths that this course studied over the past nine weeks making it possible to compare him. Some aspects are still questionable of Keyes’s, like his childhood, but otherwise he does represent much of what has been learned of the psychopath in this class.
A child or an adolescent being diagnosed with psychopathy is a controversial concept and yet there are a number of studies that purport to assess psychopathic traits within these groups. This has stemmed from evidence that key symptoms of psychopathy (at least when looking into the histories of adult psychopathic patients) have been indicative of an early onset with symptoms beginning in childhood or early adolescence. (Johnstone & Cooke, 2004). Psychopathy, at least in adults, is a viable construct and is often indicative of criminality, violence, substance abuse and results in decidedly poorer responsivity to treatment and as such highlights the importance of recognizing these early symptoms and planning intervention and treatment strategies. (Johnstone & Cooke, 2004; Skeem, Monahan, & Mulvey, 2003; Hempill, Hare, & Wong, 1998; Salekin, Rogers & Sewell, 1996).
Owning up to societal demands of taking responsibility and conforming to norms that we all are expecting to live by are also issues that they find demanding. In addition, they also find it hard to restrain their impulses. It is the combination of these emotional, interpersonal and behavioral features that define psychopathy (Hare, 2003). Causes of Psychopathy Additionally, some early life experiences have been shown to increase the risks of becoming a psychopath; experiences such as negative and abusive parenting and the death of a parent or someone close to the individual. In this research paper, I will be discussing some of the etiological causes of psychopathy.
What we were interested in is to gauge if the presence of the Psychopathic trait in individuals coincided with similar levels of the other two traits. To prove that the other two traits can be used to predict psychopathy, we needed at least correlation in any or both of the other traits and the absence of a high negative correlation with any of the traits. A measures of between 0 and 0.3 signify a low correlation, while figures those between 0.3 and 0.5 signify mid correlation. A figure between 0.5 and 1 indicates a high correlation (Andale, 2012). The –ve or +ve sign before the figure indicates whether it is a negative correlation or positive correlation respectively.