Summary Of Emmett's Bloody Nose By Sally Mann

1175 Words3 Pages

In the great tradition of classical art, nudity and death have been two main themes of the masters. Sally Mann’s photographs twist this tradition when the nudes are her prepubescent children and the corpses are real people. The issue is that her photographs are a lens into unfiltered actuality, and consumers question the morality of the images based on the fact that children and corpses are unable to give legal consent. Her work feels too personal and too private. Mainly, people question whether or not Mann meant to cause an uproar with her work or if the results were completely unintentional. After looking through what Sally Mann herself has said, it can be determined that both options have a grain of truth. She wanted to provoke thought, …show more content…

They were idealized forms, and they often reminded one of miniature adults in scenes and situations possibly uncommon. Sally Mann turned this tradition on its head by using her actual, nude children in her photographs and placing them in environments that could be worrisome. Consider the image of her son Emmett with a bloody nose in “Emmett’s Bloody Nose” because it shows the boy injured and bleeding. Most parents would not want the general public to see the distress of their child, rather they would want to help them and erase the memory. This was a statement that Mann was trying to make, but it did not go over well with much of the public: kids are sometimes little adults, and they fight, love, and get dirty within a realm with innocent sensuality and without worry. Mann wanted to show the beginnings of sexuality that are undeniably, and accidentally present in childhood. However, Woodward described how “[Mann’s] pictures dramatize burgeoning sexuality, while implying the more forbidden topics of incest and child abuse” to many viewers. He was pointing out how Sally Mann may have gone too far in some images with what she was implying and having the children portray. Mann seems to accelerate the maturation process of the children by putting the children in adult situations with adult implications: “by posing Jessie with a candy cigarette and Virginia in Lolita glasses …show more content…

“Hayhook” and “Damaged Child” are examples that show her children in distress by being hurt or by being fully nude. Mann cannot be blamed for the reactions that are experienced by everyone who views or buys her innocent works of art. Unfortunately, she is still partly responsible for those reactions because of the legal definition of child pornography. Child pornography is defined as “any visual depiction of sexually explicit conduct involving a minor (someone under 18 years of age)” even though “sexually explicit conduct does not require that an image depict a child engaging in sexual activity.” The Department of Justice says that a photograph of a nude child “may constitute illegal child pornography if it is sufficiently sexually suggestive.” Mann never received any legal trouble from the government because her images cannot be considered child pornography. FBI presence was even requested by Sally Mann, and the agent she talked to assured her that she had nothing to worry about because her work was artistic enough to prevent it from being illegal. It is extremely unfortunate that critics “exaggerated the intimacy of the photographs at the expense of their artfulness” because there is no question that Mann did not intend for her photographs to provide pleasure or anything but

Open Document