Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Political philosophy
Introduction In this policy analysis, I will be looking more in depth on the Conservation conference speech, which took place in the year 2015, delivered by the Secretary of State for education Nicky Morgan. In this analysing, I will be identifying different concepts of discourses used as well as the different uses of language used by Nicky Morgan to be persuasive throughout her speech to get her conservative ideologies on education opportunity as well as education reforms proposed by the party at the Tory conference speech in October. One other thing that I will be unpacking more in details will be the concealed discourses that Nicky Morgan Uses in advising in favor to the education system improvement and progression after the labour governments changes and time in power. Education policy Policy identifies as “an enlightenment concept, it is about progress, it is about moving from inadequacies of the present to some future state of perfection where everything works well and works as it should” said by (Ball, 2014). Citied by (Adam, 2014, p.5) policy and politics is observed as “ideological in that it forms broader political programmes and social movements” as a result the political position of Nicky Morgan then ends up influencing the ideological changes in society which she puts ahead as a shared views and “defining …show more content…
It is important to understand discourses since this allows the listeners and readers to recognize the hidden ideas and meanings which are imbedded in the sentences that are being read and understood. “The language used to determine policy actually constructs the very policies it seeks to provide” (Ball, 2014, p.33). The language discourses which Nicky Morgan uses in her speech represent the “meaning and the use of propositions and words” (Ball, 2014,
This essay will address whether New Labour contained policies with which it wished to pursue, or was solely developed in order to win elections. It is important to realise whether a political party that held office for approximately 13 years only possessed the goal of winning elections, or promoted policies which it wished to pursue. If a party that held no substance was governing for 13 years, it would be unfair to the people. New Labour was designed to win elections, but still contained policies which it wished to pursue. To adequately defend this thesis, one must look at the re-branding steps taken by New Labour and the new policies the party was going to pursue. Through analysis, it will be shown that New Labour promoted policies in regards
Lyndon Baines Johnson the 36th President of the United States gave his inaugural address in Washington D.C., on Wednesday, January 20, 1965, to one of the largest crowds in history, approximately 1.2 million Americans. In the shadow of the assassination of John F. Kennedy, LBJ took up the mantle of leadership, while the country was still in a period of mourning the tragic loss and earned the trust and respect of the country to be re-elected in 1965. A speech that lasted just under 22 minutes, reflected his passion and the forward thinking spirit of his desire to transform the country through justice, liberty and union, wage a war against poverty that was facing most of the American population and return the nation to their roots as a model
The various forms of written mediums require a specific style to portray a response to an audience. A speech can be regarded as a performance of written work, such that words are arranged in a chosen way, allowing a listener to understand what the speaker is saying. Gillard’s speech tends to draw upon Herrick’s (2005) idea that rhetoric is seen as a tool to respond to a situation or
Elie Wiesel, a holocaust survivor, delivered The Nobel Peace Prize Acceptance Speech, in Oslo on December 10, 1986. He started his speech off by reciting the following prayer: "Barukh atah Adonai …shehekhyanu vekiymanu vehigianu lazman hazeh"—"Blessed be Thou…for giving us life, for sustaining us, and for enabling us to reach this day." Then, after his speech, the people thanked him for everything he had done to help humankind make peace. With a profound sense of humility, he accepted this honor.
“Since no one but you can know what's best for you, government control can't make your life better” (Browne). In 1950, communism was rising around the world. During this time, Joseph McCarthy accused a countless number of government officials of being communist spies. This event would eventually lead to the society in the book Fahrenheit 451 by Ray Bradbury. Fear and government control are both complications that are within Senator Joseph R. McCarthy’s speech and could give rise to the society and atmosphere in Bradbury’s Fahrenheit 451.
Pages 261- 267. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2011.10.006. Cameron, D. (2001). The 'Case Working with spoken discourse and communication. London: Thousand Oaks & Co. Carson, C., & Cupach, W. (2000).
This essay attempts to; discuss the dominant social policy perspectives that have influenced social policy making in the United Kingdom since 1945.
This is an edited version of Emmeline Pankhurst famous speech Freedom or Death, offered by theguardian.com as part of the compilation “Great speeches of the 20th century”. Emmeline Pankhurst delivered this address at Hartford, Connecticut, on November 13 1913, during a fundraising tour through the United States. Her audience was assembled by the Connecticut Women’s Suffrage Association, under the leadership of Katherine Houghton Hepburn. Pankhurst’s audience was aware that, four months earlier, on June 4 1913, the Women’s Social and Political Union (WSPU) member Emily Davison had put herself in the running track of the King’s horse during the Derby. Due to this assault she died four days later and she became the WSPU martyr, (who refused to
Thatcher is considered to be one of the most controversial figures in modern British politics and remains the only 20th century Prime Minister to give her name to an ideology. There has never been a clear consensus on the meaning of Thatcherism and it has been used to describe a vast array of ideas. Nigel Lawson, who claims to have invented the term, describes it as ‘a mixture of free markets, financial discipline, firm control over public expenditure, tax cuts, nationalism, ‘Victorian values’…, privatisation and a dash of populism’. Broadly, it can be argued that the main feature of Thatcherism was its opposition to the policies of the ‘post-war consensus’. Both supporters and opponents of Thatcher have created a pattern from disconnected
Over the last half of the twentieth century, the Conservative Party had a large proportion of the electorate in the south of Britain, with the Labour Party doing the same in the north of Britain. This therefore leads some to wonder how can a party call itself a national party if it only attracts voters from certain regions of the country - this then mirrors the class divide. Nonetheless, these divisions were not so evident during the Conservative victory of 1979 and, more recently, the Labour landslide victory in 1997. Regardless of this, there is an increasing amount of voter apat... ... middle of paper ... ...
In his speech, Ferry talks about France’s political parties and it turns out that through his dialogues, he is an imperialist. He believes that France should explore and conquer new nations. He is clearly biased towards imperialism ideas, and even opposes those who disagree. Ferry’s audience consisted of Europe’s political parties and politicians.
The source text was originally published in print, in Gee’s book, An Introduction to Discourse Analysis: Theory and Method.
Where Thatcher had come in on a ticket of revolutionary policy, the general feeling when Major assumed office in 1990 was that, whilst the voters had taken as much as perhaps they could in terms of state retrenchment, there was no strong call for a radical new agenda. To this end, Major's leade...
Goodwin, B. (2007) Using political ideas. 5th edition. Chichester, England: Wiley. Heywood, A. (2012) Political Ideologies: An Introduction.
Wodak, R. (1997) ‘Critical discourse analysis’, in T. van Dijk (ed.) Discourse as Social Interaction, London: Sage.