Steven Johnson Watching T. V Makes You Smarter Analysis

965 Words2 Pages

“Steven Johnson: Watching T.V Makes You Smarter” Television does hold a purpose in life; whether it is a good one or a bad one is completely up to the person or people who are watching it. For Steven Johnson, in his writing, he begins with a passage that states that watching television is more helpful to the brain rather than harmful. It secludes the person watching it to better understand what is happening in the world today. Arguments have put themselves forward to what has been said in his piece; such as, that certain shows can be helpful for better understanding, but most television is harmful to the minds of youth. Johnson, who has been working on this material for quite a long time, is trying to up hold what he has thought and what …show more content…

In this method it tells of how things that we think that are bad for us are actually essential for what is to come. As Johnson puts it, “it is a new force which is altering the mental development of the youth, but in a good way.” It is meant to enhance our learning capabilities and not dumb them down. For example, in politics you have to listen to the good points of views as well as the bad to comprehend what truly is going on. Someone cannot always have one point of view, it is always essential to be open to others views as well. This brings me to the point that everyone has the right to share their own opinion on a subject. Back to the Sleeper Curve analysis, Johnson’s method has shown great improvement to the learning capabilities of youth; in other words it makes a lot of sense to what he is saying. All he is stating is that shows like 24 and Cops can be essential for the learning capabilities on what is happening in the world …show more content…

Johnson refers to this statement as, “cognitive demands that televised narratives place on their viewers” (pg. 280). It is astonishing how one television show can make the mind follow whatever is says or does on the show. Shows such as Starsky and Hutch, in the 80s, were made with a beginning introduction, a main plot, and always had a conclusion that ended with them catching their bad guy. In the shows today such as 24 it jumps from plot, to the climax, then back to what happened last week, and finishes with a cliff hanger so you don’t know what is going to happen next. Can you see the difference between the generations? This is exactly what Johnson means as televised intelligence. The media industry wants to see how and if you can follow the day to day happenings in the shows, and to see if you can comprehend what they are trying to put forth on said shows. Johnson knows of these demands and has followed them by viewing the viewer of the show, using facts and research to come up with what he calls televised

Open Document