Steve Mccurry Code Of Ethics

1251 Words3 Pages

Introduction Steve McCurry is an award winning photographer known for iconic images including that of Sharbat Gula, the Afghan Girl (1). McCurry’s work has also been at the center of controversy due to alterations made to some of his work (2). I will argue that I believe the altering of photographs using Photoshop by Mr. McCurry’s and his studio were indeed unethical. The reason for my stance is fairly straightforward. First, Mr. McCurry was acting as a photojournalist in the eyes of his audience and not as a story teller which means he was operating under a bearer of the public trust. That trust encompasses showing the world as it is and not an altered version of it. Altering images significantly as he did violates that trust. Second, …show more content…

The NPAA clearly highlights the importance of a photo journalist’s role in informing the public of what is going on in the world (5). The go on to highlight that photo journalists are “trustees” (5) of the public who help inform and capture human history. The NPAA also highlights the involvement of altering of photos as a key part of the code of ethics with the ruling that “Editing should maintain the integrity of the photographic images' content and context. Do not manipulate images or add or alter sound in any way that can mislead viewers or misrepresent subjects” (5). We see here yet again that the violation is not in the editing itself, but the breaking of the confidence and/or trust of the public. Lastly, the NPAA suggests photographers should “respect the integrity of the photographic moment” (5). Altering photos subverts that …show more content…

McCurry’s photos were not often dramatic in alteration, the outcry from the public clearly shows that trust was violated. McCurry went beyond simply touching up some photographs by creating significant alterations (2). Ethical lines are very clear around image alterations. While most bodies understand that there are occasions when slight alterations can be made, the editing, removal, or any alteration that harms the relationship between author and reader violates this code (9). Beyond simple ethical rules, we see that journalistic integrity is on trial today in America. Even with the freedom of the press enshrined in our Constitution, we see hostility toward media and journalists (7) where the main accusation lobbied at them is the willful promotion of bias and dishonesty from the media who are supposed to be trustworthy distributors of the truth. As photographers and journalist who are bearers of the public trust, it is critical that that trust be maintained or their work becomes subjective and open to interpretation. Often times, powerful people use any breach of that trust toward their own ends which only works if the public believes the ethics of journalist are in doubt. To summarize, while I believe that Mr. McCurry’s alterations of photographs are indeed trivial, I think the impact of public perception of his work by nature means that his actions were

Open Document