Stephanie Ericsson's Essay: The Ways We Lie

1161 Words3 Pages

Lying to Ourselves
Modern culture is comfortable with bending the truth. This thought poses the question, “is culture’s comfort with lies leading to a feeling of apathy in other aspects?” If we lose trust we become complacent in matters that seem simple, then escalation occurs and large problems can arise. Apathy is especially disturbing in the example of privacy. Personally, nothing bothers me more than someone complaining about a problem, without trying to look for a solution. This is exactly the case with privacy concerns. I will discuss this concept by discussing how lies lead to apathy, how apathy affects privacy, and how to remedy the situation.
Words can have multiple meanings and applications. To avoid confusion, I want to define what …show more content…

Due to this fact, it seems that a day does not pass without hearing or saying at least one lie. Stephanie Ericsson in her piece “The Ways We Lie” makes the observation about her life “I once tried to go a whole week without telling a lie, and it was paralyzing.” We, as a culture, put utility in this action of lying. This leads to a massive amount of misinformation being transmitted. After undergoing a barrage of information that is false, it is natural to get a thick skin. This is the root of the problem, if we ignore lies then we can easily blow off valid information. If we blow off information then it leads us not to care about the matter. Sometimes the only person we can trust that is telling the truth is only ourselves. Without the trust of truth it is difficult to get behind someone’s cause, and this causes …show more content…

The concept of Facebook as social media is fantastic when pitched as such. In the beginning that was the aim of the website and it was pretty benign. As the website gained traction and users it needed to become a business and generate revenue. Naturally the website added advertisements in order to begin to make money. Eventually advertisement firms discovered that targeted advertisements generate more revenue than non-targeted. This leads the firms to buy user data which Facebook has been collecting. This becomes a symbiotic relationship, where the only person who does not benefit is the user whose data is sold. User’s arguments are relatively weak though, because they sign away their right to selling their data when they agree to the terms of use. Ericsson references an interesting dynamic about groupthink “a lie as a psychological phenomenon within decision-making groups in which loyalty to the group has become more important than any other value”. With this group thought process dangerous outcomes can occur. If a group of people are involved in a website, like Facebook, they feel more comfortable with the idea that their data may be sold. This is due to the group dynamic similar to the “we are all in this together” mentality. It takes individuals to step back and think about what they think about the system. The hope of the users is that they are able to trust the advertising firms to use their data

Open Document