Staffing Issues in Nursing: Annotated Bibliography

970 Words2 Pages

Gordon, S., Buchanan, J., & Bretherton, T. (2008). Safety in Numbers: Nurse-to-Patient Ratios and the Future of Health Care (pp. 1-2). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. This book is a comprehensive look at mandatory legislated ratios and how effective they are in the localities where they have been enacted. It takes into account the pro-ratio arguments, the anti-ratio arguments, discusses the events leading up to the enactment of this legislation, and discusses the results and the research used in evaluating ratio legislation. The strengths of this source are that it’s comprehensive and credible source (it was published by an academic publisher). One of the weaknesses of this source is that the book is very long, and some of the subtopics are not as well indexed as I would have liked. Hodge, M. B., Romano, P. S., Harvey, D., Samuels, S. J., Olson, V. A., Sauve, M., & Kravitz, R. K. (2004). Licensed Caregiver Characteristics and Staffing in California Acute Care Hospital Units [Electronic version]. The Journal of Nursing Administration, 34(3), 125-133. This article is a comprehensive look at staffing on hospital units. It used a survey to look at characteristics of how the units were staffed – not just ratio, but the experience and education level of the nurses. It evaluated several different categories of hospital facilities – public versus private, academic medical centers versus HMO-affiliated medical centers, and city versus rural. It is a good source because it shows what some of the staffing levels were before the status quo of the ratio legislation passed in California. It’s main limitation as a source is that it doesn’t supply any information about patient outcomes. DeVandry, S., & Cooper, J. (2009). Mandat... ... middle of paper ... ...so much detail about the data that it can be difficult to get a clear picture of how the staffing models would “look” in practice. Griffiths, P. (2009). Staffing Levels and Patient Outcomes [Electronic version]. Nursing Management, 16(6), 22-23. This article is skeptical of mandated nursing ratios, and discusses some outside factors that may be biasing the other studies I plan to cite. This article's strengths are that is from a peer-reviewed journal and written by a recognized expert, which makes it a credible source. Rather than simply supporting or opposing mandated maximum ratios, it introduces the idea that the other ratio studies may have missed some important considerations. The main drawback to this source is that it's a short article and doesn't go into a lot of detail. I may have to end up using other sources to supplement the ideas it proposes.

More about Staffing Issues in Nursing: Annotated Bibliography

Open Document