Special Education Research Paper

687 Words2 Pages

The Fundamentals of Title 34 C.F.R. Section 300.503 – Special Education Prior Written Notice

Over the past few weeks, a number of local education agencies (“LEA”) have raised questions about special education prior written notice (“PWN”). Failure to provide legally sufficient PWN continues to be a frequent allegation in special education due process hearing. In fact, six of the Texas Education Agency’s (“TEA”) 2017 published special education decisions involve the issue of PWN. While the statutory requirements for the content of PWN can be found at 34 CFR 300.503, we would like to share some practical advice and address some common misconceptions.

Fill-In-The-Blank PWN Forms

Some LEAs utilize fill-in-the-blank PWN forms available through their IEP software program or sample forms available on the U.S. Department of Education’s website. Some IEP software is designed to …show more content…

(Weil v. Board of Elementary & Secondary Education, 17 IDELR 902 (5th Cir. 1991)) A common misconception is that LEAs are required to provide a separate PWN document at the conclusion of an ARD meeting. Since a PWN is only required when the LEA has proposed or refused action, the LEA is not required to provide PWN when the ARD committee has not completed the ARD process by making an offer of FAPE. For example, if an ARD committee decides to table and reconvene a meeting because the committee ran out of time and could not complete the ARD process in one sitting. PWN may also not be required when the ARD committee fails to reach a consensus and must schedule a 10-day reconvene to continue the ARD process. In both examples, generally speaking, the ARD process has not concluded because no decisions regarding changes or refused action have been

Open Document