Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Social pathological view of deviance
Social pathological view of deviance
Sociological theory deviance
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Social pathological view of deviance
I’ve known her almost my entire life; her name is Marie. She is beautiful, silly, smart, and independent, but she is also deviant when it comes to social rules and expectations. Sociologically speaking, deviance is just that: “behaviour that breaks rules, or violates people’s expectations (Tepperman, 2013). Marie has broken many rules when it comes to mental illness, appearance norms, and sexuality but of course these behaviours wouldn’t be considered deviant if it were not for the social response to the socially constructed rules.
I remember as a teenager, Marie was always a pretty good kid. She had a small, yet good group of friends, she never did drugs, she did extremely well in school, and yet she was depressed. At first she was just
…show more content…
When Marie was struggling with depression, it was really the stress that came along with being labelled that affected Marie. Symbolic interactionists look at the effects of labelling and stigmatization. In order for Marie to receive the label of mentally ill, meant she was an outsider (Tepperman, 2013). On the other hand, critical theorist view mental illness as reflections of unequal social stresses, and disadvantages in society (Tepperman, 2013) Marie grew up in a poorer, less privileged family, and critical theorists continue to find higher-than-average rates of mental illness in these conditions. In regards to Marie’s appearance issues, symbolic interactionist theories suggest that deviants are not born, rather, they are made. They are interested in learning how someone with bulimia learns to purge. Feminist theories tend to focus on issues of beauty. Society places a great deal of pressure on women to conform to the expectations of what beauty is, and Marie felt a strong need to live up to these expectations even though it caused unintentional deviance. Finally when it comes to Marie’s sexuality, symbolic interactionist theories suggest sexual deviants are only different we have repressed, labelled and stigmatized them as different (Tepperman, 2013). Critical theories see dominant groups influencing and defining what sexual activities are normal. Debates about homosexuality result from conflicting beliefs and misunderstandings. When it comes to sexual deviance, functionalist suggest that some of this behaviour is valuable to society because it outlines the boundaries for socially acceptable behaviour and promotes social
In the study of Sociology of Deviance, sociologists develop theories and perspective in explaining the account for deviant and studying of how the society reacts. It is an interesting field to study because the difference and changes of deviance and social norms have a significant impact on individuals and groups. In this essay, I will examine varies definitions and perspective of Erikson and Heckerts respectively in respect to the following concepts: deviance serves certain functions for society, the typology of positive and negative deviance and the "middle class norms", and the labelling perspective on deviance.
After reading all four articles, it has come to my attention that deviant behavior is everywhere in our society, and all around the world. Different cultures have different norms and morals making things we believe are normal, deviant. Deviance can be seen in everything, sexual intercourse, rock n roll, and even so much as technology.
The topic of social deviance encompasses such a broad range of ideas. Something as monumentally significant as the Holocaust, as well as something as seemingly insignificant as not covering ones’ mouth while coughing, are both seen as acts of social deviance. Social deviance being any act that is contrary to that which is accepted in one’s society, it seems nearly impossible not to be socially deviant at least occasionally. Today, not only the culture in America but also the culture of human beings in their entirety, has been transformed by socially deviant acts. Some of these historical transformations have been for the better. Others have not. Regardless of the outcome, most acts of deviance are made in an attempt to better society. If the opposite effect is experienced, society reverts to a previous structure. For the less significant acts of deviance, tolerance is often the result of continued deviance, though it is possible that continued deviance will lead to stronger emphasis on cultural norms. An example in America of such an act is, as mentioned before, not saying “God bless you” following the sneeze of another. Society could either evolve to disregard the lapse in etiquette or to chastise any who do not conform to this mannerism. Social deviance is society’s way of introducing change. Whether accepted or rejected, social deviance does indeed have a purpose other than simply contradicting social norms.
How are the Competing Explanations of Deviance Relative to Juveniles who are Serving Life Sentences in Prison?
In this course we have tackled numerous topics in a short span of time. These topics have spanned from social sciences, the origins of man, the birth of personalities, and the concepts of marriage and family. Out of all these interesting topics though, the theme of deviance and criminality evolved my mindset the most. As an avid comic book/manga reader I believe that hero is only as interesting as the villains they face.This ideal shows throughout with popular examples such as Batman with Joker, Superman with Lex Luthor, Thor with Loki, and the X-Men with Magneto. With this mindset however, I never really dove into the process of why these villains are evil until we covered the deviance and criminality chapter of our course. This paper will
Deviant behavior is sociologically defined as, when someone departs from the “norms”. Most of the time when someone says deviance they think against the law or acting out in a negative behavior. To sociologists it can be both positive and negative. While most crimes are deviant, they are not always. Norms can be classified into two categories, mores and folkways. Mores are informal rules that are not written; when mores are broken, they can have serious punishments and sanctions. Folkways are informal rules that are just expected to be followed, but have no real repercussions.
Sociologists suggest deviance is a violation of any societal norm. Yet some have suggested deviance is a socially outmoded concept based on a Durkheim’s model of social solidarity. Therefore suggesting now it is obsolete, there is no longer a use for it in a (post) modern progressive and diverse society like Australia. According to Roach Anleu (2004) Colin Sumner was one such claimant. Sumner suggested that the sociological concept of deviance and any coherent theoretical development stagnated in mid 1970s, as no agreement on how deviance should be set never happened, therefore there was never an answer to the question, “deviant from what”? Secondly, Sumner states there is no explanation for why deviance is the chosen subject of research, instead of the norms that specify deviance. He believed it only made sense to examine deviance within the framework of social disapproval. Sumner also believed the relationships between deviance, crime, and difference to be unclear. Lastly he thought that the search for a general concept to encompass such a assorted range of activities, problems and situations was misguided because there can be no behavioural unity for such a diverse range of practices. Sumner (1994) suggested that the focus should analysis how deviant categories are constructed and managed by the power relationships that are continually changing. (Sumner 1994), (Roach Anleu 2014) Roach Anleu (2014) describe norms as reflecting some level of consensus and can be laws, rules, regulations, standards, or unspoken expectations. However, within large communities, there can be individuals, and groups whose behaviour is perceived as deviant according to the accepted norms. Those individuals and or groups may not necessarily be consider...
Deviance is any behavior, belief, or condition that violates significant social norms in the society or group in which it occurs (Kendall, 2012). Our experiment will study the behavioral deviance of a social norm. Sociologists use symbolic interactionism to study face-to-face interactions. We are expected to follow these certain unwritten rules of behavior telling us the way that we should act in certain situations. The social norm or folkway I chose to break was that of invading an individual’s personal space. See Figure 1.0 showing the proximity generally utilized by Americans, according to Edward T.Hall. Personal space is the region surrounding a person, approximately 18 inches, which they regard as psychologically theirs. People value their personal space, and feel discomfort, anger, or anxiety when their personal space is encroached (Personal space, n.d.). We walked around to find the best scenario and individuals to interject our teammate in purposefully invading their comfort zone.
Whatever the term deviance creates , in general it is popularly assumed that 'deviants' are individuals who are somehow less capable, less socially responsible, less adjusted, and consequently less useful to society than their more fortunate, upright and 'normal' fellows ( Social Deviance in Australia, p 4). In the case of Aboriginal drinking, alcohol is the main source of criminalisation and incarceration. This public labelling gives the individual an entirely new status- one which tends to dominate the person's self conception. Once this assumes a 'master status' it becomes the major reference for personal identity and relegates all to other 'normal' characteristics to a subsidiary status. This process insures that characteristics such as sexual preference, comes to intrude upon and influence almost their entire existence. Once identified publicly, (homosexuals), the person is treated differently and expected to behave differently (Study guide p18). The creation of deviance according to Merton is seen as the responsibility of society ( or the law abiding and respectable members of society) and of the official agents of social control ( police, magistrates, social workers, teachers, judges, doctors and psychiatrists) ( Social Deviance in Australia p 5). Merton draws attention to the causal significance of social, economic and cultural factors of all kinds in pushing or pulling certain types of individuals into courses of action which involved rule breaking. Interactionists', however, like Becker are primarily concerned with the role social control plays in the social production of deviance, which may take two main forms- rule making and rule enforcing. As Becker (1963:9) writes: 'social groups create deviance by making the rules whose infraction constitute deviance... and by applying these rules to particular people and labelling them outsiders. While Quinney states that crime is created. He refers to the social definition of deviance, to the fact that the system of government we have created for ourselves was and is constructed by those who have titled authority and power. Control is exerted through a variety of institutions run by and for the elite (Mass media, education, religion). It is those who are in power who define what is seen as deviant behaviour.
Deviance is the behavior and the standards of expectations of a group or society. It is also behavior that is considered dangerous, threatening or offensive. The people that are deviant are often labeled to be weirdos, oddballs, or creeps. In the United States, people with tattoos, drug addicts, alcoholics, and compulsive gamblers are all considered deviant. Sociologists believe that everybody is deviant from time to time. They believe each person will violate a social norm in certain situations. People are considered deviant if they don't stand for the national anthem at a sports event, dress casually to a fancy restaurant, or skip classes. One category of deviance is Crime. Crime is a violation of norms that have been formally enacted into a law. Another category of deviance is humorous. Deviance is relative, what is deviant in one group or society may not be deviant in another group or society.
Social deviancy is the violation of social norms. A deviant is someone who rejects folkways and mores. Any action that violates the values or rules of a social group is deviant behavior. In order to actually be characterized as a deviant, the individual must be detected committing a deviant act and be stigmatized by society. A stigma is a mark of social disgrace, setting the deviant apart from the group. Criminality is healthy for society. Deviance affirms our cultural values and norms. Responding to deviance clarifies moral boundaries and brings people together. There will always be people who break society’s rules and that’s important.
Within any given society, individuals are expected to behave and or conduct themselves in a given acceptable manner. However, there are instances when particular individuals act contrary to the set standards and violate the cultural norms. Such acts may include acts of crime, theft, defiance, breaking of rules, and truancy just to mention a few. Deviance could thus be viewed as the intentional or accidental violation of the particular behavioral aspects and ways that people are expected to act within a society (Hardy).
Deviance is the violation of cultural norms. Deviance falls into two forms: formal and informal. Formal deviance is the violation of laws in a society, resulting in crime. Informal deviance is the violation of a social norm. This is an action not acceptable by society, but cannot be punishable by law. In order to understand deviance, one must examine why individuals are deviant and what function deviance serves in society. However, there is not a definite answer for either, rather multiple theories.
Deviance is defined as actions or behaviors that violate socials norms. In turn the concept of deviance is dependent on the social observation and perception. “By it’s very nature, the constructionism through which people define and interpret actions or appearances is always “social.” ”(Henry, 2009 , p. 6) One’s perception of a situation may be completely different from another depending on cultural and social factors. The way someone talks, walks, dresses, and holds themselves are all factors that attribute to how someone perceives another. In some cases what is socially or normally acceptable to one person is deviant in another’s eyes. For this reason there is a lot of gray area involving the topic of deviance because actions and behaviors are so diversely interpreted.
As we all have observed, throughout history each culture or society has unique norms that are acceptable to that group of people. Therefore, to establish and come to the acceptance of these basic norms, each society must develop its’ own strategies and techniques to encourage the fundamentals of behavior, which is clear in our modern society. Most do assume that everyone in a society will follow and respect such norms. However, some tend to deviate from the adequate norms and demonstrate deviant behavior. Nevertheless, we are inclined to ask ourselves, why do people decide to violate such important standards of living?