Social Inequaries In Sociology

730 Words2 Pages

There are a plethora of social institutions and variables that make up society. In fact, there are so many moving parts to our societal machine that there is an entire field dedicated to studying it. This field is, of course, sociology. This you already knew. There are three really important elements, or categories, that exist in this field. Actually there is a superabundance of important categories in this filed, but the ones being discussed right now are social location, social inequalities, and social institutions. The reason for talking about these three specifically is the connection that they share. Each one of these categories are influenced by and influence the other ones. Of course the main influencer among these is social location. …show more content…

All people have a social location that is defined by their gender, race, social class, age, ability, religion, sexual orientation, and geographic location. Each group membership confers a certain set of social roles and rules, power, and privilege (or lack of), which heavily influence our identity and how we see the world” ("Glossary."). Our social location has a massive effect on our group values, norms, and memberships. Our group values are the values that are practiced by the groups we affiliate ourselves with. Are social location is the reason why we choose these specific groups and thus are social location is what determines the group values in which we adhere to. For example, someone who is homosexual or transgendered would typically align themselves politically with the Democratic Party. This creates the highly likely adoption of the values that come along with such affiliations. The norms in a group are determined by the individuals who make up that group. Being that Social Location is the reason for which a person joins a certain group, it would make logical sense to assume that a person’s personal background, which effects their affiliations, would determine the individuals involved in said group and thus the norms. Social location also has an enormous impact on social …show more content…

Every one of these variables can be traced back to a connection with an individual’s social location. While there are many different variables that cause inequality in society, the majority of it is caused by difference in race, sex, and gender. The problem with the first and last categories is the fact that both are social constructs. Which inherently speaks to the norms of a specific society. The social location of an entire society, which is determined by the norms of that society can actually cause the creation of social constructs like race and gender. The norms of this certain society dictate what types of skin tone, hair color, personality, etc., are prominent in such a society. This in turn causes the creation of these social constructed labels to help explain the difference. Humans have a habit of doing this because they are afraid of what they do not understand, so they must create an explanation. This is probably how most, if not all, religions came about. Because of the norms created by the entire societies social location, the creation of differences causes certain individuals to be treated differently and thus creates social inequality. In actuality difference in race does not biologically exist (Templeton). Social location’s impact does not stop there. Other major areas that social location effects are the social

Open Document