Six Key Components Of Post-Processual Archaeology?

604 Words2 Pages

The study of archaeology today mixes various theoretical approaches and outlooks, many of which grew out of debates that took place during the second half of the twentieth century (from the 10950s). Before then many explanations of change were based on the hypothesis of diffusion and migration which is culture history. It was then in 1950s that then archaeologists became dissatisfied with these explanations which did clearly elaborate on how these changed, therefore to understand prehistoric societies new ways of thinking were formed. This then led to the arise of more archeological frameworks; post processual archaeology being one of them.
Post processual archaeology which is also known as interpretive archaeology is a movement in archaeological …show more content…

Post-processualists also criticized previous archaeological work for overemphasizing materialist interpretations of the past and being ethically and politically irresponsible. It began in the United Kingdom where it was led by Ian Hodder who was influenced by historian R.G Collingwood. Hodder explains the six key components of post processual archaeology in his book theory and practice in archaeology being; situational expediency, materialism versus idealism, anthropology versus history, the relationship between subject and object, absolute dichotomy between societies and individuals, separation of system and structure. Hodder said the approach developed with a group of students in Cambridge University which was a reaction to the then dominant processual archaeology which viewed culture as an adaptive process and believed archaeology could elaborate more on migrated theories and perspectives. There are also other archaeologists who helped develop this

More about Six Key Components Of Post-Processual Archaeology?

Open Document