More handpicked essays just for you.
Different types of leadership styles essay
Different types of leadership styles essay
Different types of leadership styles essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Leaders are faced with different situations, work with people of varied abilities every day, and therefore have to adapt our leadership styles. This is fundamental when looking for a positive outcome. To understand the factors that influence leadership style, it is important to look at some examples of leadership styles. Situational Leadership Style– This is when the leader themselves assess the situation and then adjusts their leadership method accordingly, for example, the leader will assess the ability of their fellow employee or their enthusiasm to learn and grow in their role. This model can be seen as one of the best ways to develop an effective and productive work environment (Miller, B. (2010). What is the Situational Leadership Model?). …show more content…
This style uses the attributes, such as beliefs and personal strengths, of the follower themselves in order to inspire them to complete tasks and progress in their job role. Transactional Leadership Style – This leadership style uses the reward and punishment approach as a form of motivation for their team members. The leader will give something to their team members in exchange for the team member has to co-operate and complete tasks delegated to them. Depending on the level of hierarchy of leader, if is known for the lead to offer an increased salary, incentives or even a promotion. If the team members do not perform their duties to an acceptable standard then the individuals may be offered less opportunities in the future, privileges taken from them, or a …show more content…
Individuals within the Support Team we all come from different backgrounds, have different personalities, skills, knowledge base and experience. Some of the team want to progress whilst others are content with their current position. Whilst there are core skills that are identifiable across the whole of the team, some other has more experience and more knowledge in certain areas. Therefore, because of this variety, leaders have to adjust their style in accordance to the person and situation they find themselves in. Someone from a difficult background may have difficulty in communicating and needs to feel comfortable and safe, whereas someone who has come from a health background may be more outspoken is able to communicate and converse with the leader effectively. An individual with more experience may not need as much help advice and attention as another individual who has only just started the field of work. Therefore, the leader can trust the experienced individual to get on with delegated tasks. Personality is another factor that can affect the leadership style a leader choses to adopt. An introvert may not be confident to ask for help or do things without being given specific steps to take, whereas an extrovert may feel much more confident in their job role and is happy to ask for help when needed but will also troubleshoot issues and find the steps for
8. (a) Situational Leadership is a model of leadership that selects from four different leadership styles that adapted their ability to be more effective for the employee’s task behavior and relationship behavior. (b)The stages of situational leadership are telling, selling, delegating, participating. Telling is the leader 's concern highly on task and don’t have any relationship
While transactional leadership relies on a system of rewards and penalties it doesn't provide a lot of in conditions of inspiration to encourage folks to travel past the fundamentals. Given this truth the supporters of transactional leaders may get happy and develop a propensity to attain smallest expectations solely that might facilitate them avoid penalties (Bass, 1990). Therefore the leader and also the follower ar in associate conformity on what the follower would take delivery of achieving the negotiated level of performance (Bass, 1990). The success of such leadership depends on the extent of satisfaction the leader and followers have in following this technique of performance based mostly appraisals (Bass, 1990)
In situational leadership theory and path-goal theory, both theories assume that leaders are flexible and can display any or all styles depending on the situation or environment. Situational leadership theory emphasizes the importance of adjusting leadership style based on the needs of the followers. Path-goal theory leaders help followers along their path and are more effective if they adapt their behaviors to the current environment. Each leadership theory describes four different styles or behaviors to use for effective leadership. The style of telling, selling, participating, and delegating are used in STL...
In the first situation, I would take Action C, that is, make the decision myself with reasons. After an assessment of the employees’ capabilities, I would choose the most qualified for the task at hand. Later, I would explain the reasons behind my decision to the workforce to avoid instances of distrust among the employees. The most qualified will be the one chosen to do the task before the impending deadline.
This method implies that leaders and follower have combine motives that can be beneficial to both parties. When theses task are assigned, there is a designed reward or punishment for the followers. This method of leadership can also be associated with managing in a sense. Transactional leadership in a sense is like management in that it does not look to inspire or promote change, it is in fact more about ensuring a particular process, and procedure meets the desired results.
Transactional leadership focuses on the concept of exchanging rewards or punishment between the leader and his or her followers. For instance, if a follower accomplishes a goal, the leader may praise the follower with a pay raise or bonus. While, transformational leadership is designed around the process of both the leader and followers working together to increase motivation and morality within the group. When these two forms of leadership are combined in one organization they may have a positive impact on the organization and its employees. The leader and followers
The Situational Approach to leadership focuses on the leader’s ability to assess and adapt to the demands of a situation. Hersey, Blanchard, and Johnson (2009) stated no one leadership style is consistently effective given the diverse individuals and tasks making up each situation (as cited in Ramkissoon, 2013). Thus, the contexts requiring leadership must be assessed for their diversity and an appropriate leadership style selected.
First, a situational style of leader is culturally aware is knowledgeable about the mission at hand and knows the Soldier’s strengths and weaknesses. Leaders consistently base their decisions off situation. As leaders, we provide purpose, direction and
Leadership is a process where the work of others is directed and influenced towards the achievement of set goal, and it has a potential of influencing other people’s behaviours hence it is always easy to be followed. Keith Davis defines leadership as “the ability to persuade others to seek defined objectives enthusiastically. It is the human factor which binds a group together and motivates it towards goals.” One can be a leader without occupying any managerial position, but by virtue of having leadership qualities, one can be a leader irrespective of any position one holds. While on the other hand for one to be a true manager, one should have characteristics of a leader. A manager has a responsibility of providing leadership to the team/group
Transformational leadership approaches aligned with learning organization characteristics of supporting, recognizing, correcting and setting expectations for the team. The team accomplishment of tasks is achieved through participation, motivating, training, sharing of ideas through personal attention and collaborations (Kareem, 2016). Learning organizations implement transactional leadership styles of rewarding, interventions and specific tasks. Like learning organization, transactional leaders reward their staff in exchange for effort; the leaders acknowledge excellent production with awards; and communicates the rewards given for different performances (Kareem, 2016). Transactional leadership and autocratic leadership methods are executed in traditional organizations. Like traditional organizational leadership, transactional leadership organizes their businesses into parts; they guide their followers toward established goals. The leader is closed minded and arbitrary (Lopez & Ensari, 2014). The traditional organization also used autocratic leadership style (Kareem, 2016). The leaders control subordinates and are supremely confident and comfortable in their decision-making responsibility business operations and strategic plans without input from
Situational approach defines the different leadership style based on combination of supportive or directive behavior. It also considers the development level of the followers. The development status is defined by commitment and competence level of followers. Development status and commitment level are not very easy to determine by a leader/ supervisor. There is no quantifiable measure to indicate commitment and competence level of any employee, it become more difficult when you are new in any organization working with new people and supervisor. I will explain two situations where commitment and competence are overestimated and underestimated.
Situational leadership is easy to understand and gives you multiple tools and styles to be able to train and work with all types of employees. As a military member we are taught leadership traits once you become a noncommissioned officer. The situational leadership style is always brought up, because it can be widely used over all groups of people and personalities. The situational leadership styles easily covert over to the political framework, and give a manager more tools to become more effective for both the employees and the
There are a few different types of well known leadership styles, authoritarian, delegative, and democratic. To assess my leadership style I used two online tests to help me determine my style. I felt the results were accurate and I fall into a democratic style/participative style. If I am leading I prefer to include the group and get their feedback on solving issues. However, I still make the final decision after listening to the thoughts of the group on a particular topic. This is considered to be a positive style of leadership that is inspiring to the group involved. The leaders decision making tends to be more accurate due to the input of other experts. (Cite)
Each of these styles has a place in a leader’s approach, and for the exceptional leader, each may be necessary depending on the type of follower that they are dealing with. (Hackman & Johnson,
The Situational Theories of leadership explain how leadership style must be tailored to the demands of the task and the qualities of subordinates.