Simple Arguments Against Animal Rights

Animal Rights Animal rights are not a priority, but it should be a priority. When people look at these animals they do not think about killing them or making them suffer. Many people see their animals as family. So why are other people treating animals so unfair? I’m proanimal rights and here are three simple argument that animal rights should be a law: in the consequences of animal rights, the case for animal rights and, no use of animals for hard labour on animal rights.

The consequence of animal rights There should be a consequence if your against animal rights. Jamuna Carroll quoted that the “members of the community of equals are not to be arbitrarily deprived of their liberty; if they should be imprisoned without due legal process” (Carroll). The people for the community was for animal rights, but people said there should be a thin line about it because people think only some animals should have rights. I think that every living thing should have rights and here's why. We kill animals for food. There's no way around that, but we should not let them suffer during the process. They need to be taken good care of, even if they’re food.

The animals should have rights and if people don't follow them there should

The people are finally seeing what people do to their animals like KFC the PETA says the chickens are forced to live in cramped conditions, frequently suffer broken bones, and are boiled while conscious(KFC). Author and law professor Steven M. Wise say that “All nonhuman animals, on the other hand, are things with no rights. The law ignores them unless a person decides to do something to them, and then, in most cases, nothing can be done to help them”(Wise). Professor Wise states that just because they're not numan that there should be no rights but the law ignores it for the simple fact that they're not