Simon Lord Of The Flies Good Or Bad Essay

864 Words2 Pages

On further exploring the interesting topic of humans being essentially bad, William Golding, a Nobel prize winner in literature and the author of Lord of the Flies, tells a tale about British boys crashing on an island while part of the British evacuation program. These boys show that humans are essentially bad. Specifically, this is a young boy named Roger. In this novel, Roger quickly makes his way into the spot of evil character by kicking over sand castles and murdering Piggy, a sweet, tubby boy. The death of another boy named Simon, also gives off the vibe of humans being essentially bad. Simon is torn apart by the other boys’, using only their teeth and hands. Simon’s blood soaks into the sand, meaning a lot of blood. Now if the topic is brought back to history, Adolf Hitler is a perfect example of people being essentially bad. Hitler murdered about six million …show more content…

Simon is the first boy to actually die. He dies because the other boys ripped him apart with their hands and teeth: “There were no words, and no movements but the tearing of teeth and claws” (Golding 153). As the boys’ get more uncivilized, they do more daring things. When the boys spilt apart, two leaders happen to arise. Jack is the leader of the second group and he convinces them the beast that can take on many forms. Unfortunately, Simon “becomes” one of these forms and gets killed. A second example of the death of Simon would be what type of beast he is: “Even in the rain they could see how small a beast it was; and already its blood was staining the sand” (Golding 153). The definition of beast is “an animal, especially a large or dangerous four-footed one or a beast can be an inhumanly cruel, violent, or depraved person” (Webster’s dictionary). Simon is not large or four-footed, nor is he cruel and violent. Simon is ripped apart for no reason. Now, if history gets involved, Adolph Hitler is an amazing example of humans being essentially

Open Document