Similarities Between The Lottery And The Ones Who Walk Away From Omelas

1118 Words3 Pages

One of the moral issues every society faces is sacrifice. A democracy, a type of government that emphasizes individualism, once in a while, still resolved to sacrifice one to benefit the many. Numerous societal values are expanded from this belief and most, in the end, can proved to be detrimental. The two short stories, “The Lottery” by Shirley Jackson and “The Ones Who Walk Away from Omelas” by Ursula K Le Guin portray situations in which individuals are being scapegoated as part of societal traditions. Shirley Jackson is a female writer during mid 1900s; Jackson’s “The Lottery” received a lot of criticisms and hateful backlash. (Schlib 866-867). It is a fictional allegory about an agricultural town that sacrifice one of its member at a town …show more content…

In “The Lottery,” the lottery is conducted annually to determine the next victim. The ironic usage of the word “lottery” demonstrates that the ceremony is supposed to be something good, but rather the “winner” is awarded a violent death and the rest of the community get the fortune. The motto of this ceremony, declared by a senior member of the community, Old Man Warner, is “Lottery in June, corn be heavy soon” (Jackson 871). By sacrificing one of their own, there will be a good harvest for the next crop and families won’t starve. Similarly, in “The Ones Who Walk Away from Omelas,” the community of Omelas agreed to some kind of contrast to condemn the child to a life of cruelty in exchange for “the beauty of their city, … ,the wisdom of their scholar, … , [and] the abundance of their harvest” (Le Guin 1552). The initial description of the festivity of the city masks the ugly truth of its existence; without the child, “all the prosperity and beauty and delight of Omelas would wither” (Le Guin 1552). The characters in both stories desperately cling on to the practice of scapegoating, ignoring the victims and moral conscience, because all the splendors of their lives depend upon it. They are afraid to give all that up; they are afraid of the changes. In spite of this common objective, the circumstances surround the two traditions in two stories are …show more content…

In “The Lottery,” practically everyone in the community looks forward to the Lottery until he or she becomes the victim. For instance, Mrs. Hutchison, a popular housewife, worships that tradition, but when she draws that fateful slip of paper, she freaks out, screaming how it isn’t fair. There is low awareness of the unfairness and the wrongdoing of scapegoating. The inhabitants of this town represent the participants of a moral crime, who are directly involved the crime; they are similar to factory owners who exploit cheap labor. On the other hand, the people of Omelas actually do feel pity for the child, but the “terrible paradox … of reality” forces them to accept the truth in “tearless rage” that if they grant the child freedom, the city will crumple (Le Guin 1552). They acknowledge that it is unjust to treat the child so cruelly, but the alternative is worse. They are the observers of the moral crimes, who stand aside to watch, while indirectly benefit off that crime; they are like the majority of the people in society. Lastly, there are those who can’t endure the guilt and leave Omelas. They symbolize the minority groups who stand up to fight for what is

Open Document