Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Death and destruction in frankenstein
The nature of good and evil
Grendel's point of view essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Throughout history there has been controversy concerning whether evilness is a born or an acquired trait. According to the Merriam Webster Dictionary, evil is defined as “being profoundly immoral and malevolent”. All through history different pieces of literature document various ways evil originates from. After reading multiple texts including Frankenstein, Beowulf, and Grendel one can conclude that evilness is created not born. In the novel Frankenstein, Victor Frankenstein is taken aboard a ship to the North Pole and tells an english explorer, Robert Walton, about his life’s story. Robert discovers that Victor is a man of science and his life’s mission is to bring death back to life, which he accomplishes by creating a monster. Unlike Frankenstein, …show more content…
For example, he “tore off sly old Athelgard's head” and “ snaps at the late-winter sun like the heads of baby water snakes, here I killed the old woman with the iron gray hair. She tasted of urine and spleen, which made me spit.” Grendel doesn't understand other creatures ways of life whether it be a goat or a human. One night he is watching humans dance around a fire and it made him “shake with rage. The red sun blinded him, it churned up his belly to nausea, and the heat thrown out of the bone-fire burnt his skin. He cringed, clawing flesh, and flee for home”. Grendel hated human beings because they have a disgusting way of turning tragedy into triumph. Somehow, humans are always able to adapt their philosophies to suit the occasion and make them look good. He feels that no matter how much destruction he does he still will not be able to compare to humans disgusting way of living. Although the novel suggests that Grendel is born evil due to “an ancient feud between two brothers which split all the world between darkness and light”, Grendel’s isolation from society and knowledge led him to become monstrous. Grendel shows that he thinks of himself as God and that he has the power to kill and destroy whatever he wants because he doesn't have the same morals as them. This gives him a thinking that it is alright to kill people and animals because he is
He kills people because he enjoys it. Evidence of this can be found in an abundance throughout the novel. “An evil idea came over me-so evil they it made me shiver as I smiled-and I sidled across to the table.” (Gardner 83-84) This is the point in the story when Grendel is torturing Unferth. He's enjoying himself, smiling. The one time it would have been merciful for him to kill he refuses to do so. This scene can without a doubt prove that Grendel’s intentions are not for the best. He's not terrorizing the humans to “improve their lives”. He's doing it because it's fun to him. The reader can already see that Grendel doesn't care about the humans, so why would he ravage their town to improve their society? The only reasonable answer as to why Grendel does what he does is because he enjoys
The book Grendel, written by John Gardner, and the poem Beowulf, translated by Seamus Heaney, both have very distinct opinions on what role each character plays. The translator of Beowulf and the writer of Grendel follow the idea that everyone has a story. A story is the writer’s perspective on a character’s personality, the way people in the story see and treat the character, and the way it ties the ideas together. There are many examples in these two writings of this concept, but the main instances connect with the lives of Grendel, Beowulf, and Unferth.
He derives a satisfaction from his interactions with the Danes that he cannot get from interactions with any other creature. violent outbursts and antagonistic relationship with humans can be seen as the result of a lonely creature’s misunderstood attempts to reach out and communicate with someone else. Grendel was amused by the humans, observing of their violence that (ch 3) He was sickened by the waste of their wars, all the animals killed but not eaten. Ashamed of his monstrousness, what better that to be like the thing you envy the most.
The battle with Grendel’s mother differ from the battle with Grendel because when Beowulf fought with Grendel he used no weapon “my hands alone should fight for me” line 174. On the day of the battle, when Grendel saw Beowulf he was scared for the first time “ Grendel's one thought was to run from Beowulf, flee back to his marsh and hide there.” line 278 But when Beowulf fought with Grendel’s mother, at the beginning Beowulf was fighting for his live “ For the first time in years of being worn to war it would earn no glory” line 484 Beowulf was losing , she was to fast and “no sword could slice her evil skin.” He needed his weapons fight for him, and Grendel’s mother was not scared of his strength as Grendel
Soon afterwards however, Grendel meets man. While they first mistake him as being a part of the tree, they immediately give a violence to him when they assume that “the spirit’s angry” and that “it always has been… [and] that’s why it’s killing the tree” (Gardner 26). In his very first instance with man, they tell Grendel that he is inherently angry and murderous. This starts the evolution in Grendel to feed the violence within him. Before he interacts with man, he knew his place in the world and he would never kill without a justified purpose. Even after observing man for some time, Grendel “was sickened, if only by the waste of” (Gardner 36) the countless animals and men that they would kill and leave to rot. Grendel still has a sense of worth to the creature’s life around him, if only if it is to keep a sustainable food source. After however, he begins to become infatuated with man’s ways and their views. Scott Kenemore states, “Grendel's encounters with humans … present him with a colorful variety of worldviews and ideologies”.
He does not act like the blood hungry beast he is seen as in Beowulf. In
Even if, at first, Grendel seems almost kind, and the reader is pleased with his character, he soon becomes more and more evil, and his actions bring about a feeling of uneasiness, to say the least. Before, the killing of people for no apparent reason disgusted Grendel. However, when he brings Unferth home, he kills the two guards "so I wouldn't be misunderstood" (90). Later, in probably the most disturbing scene of the book, we see how meaningless killing has become to Grendel. He brutally attacks the queen and is determined to kill her.
Grendel is born a neutral being, perhaps even good, but nevertheless, without hate. The transition which he undergoes to become evil is due to misunderstandings between himself and humans and also meeting with a dragon who is questionably evil. As a young “monster”, Grendel knew nothing other than the cave he lived in and his mother who could not speak any distinguishable language. He was a playful creature who seemed to be like a “bla...
Two stories describe the same death. Which story got it right? When comparing Grendel by John Gardner against the ancient epic poem Beowulf, in my opinion, Grendel’s story made the better argument. In the story, Grendel is humanized, and consequently relatable. His story line fit well with the story of Beowulf, and in the book Grendel, it was expressed from Grendel’s perspective.
Grendel and Beowulf are both interesting books although Grendel may have done wrong by killing, the story he tells makes him seem very intelligent and that he is not just a killer. However, one of these stories is better than the other, sure Beowulf is a good story too, but Grendel is overall better .The author in Grendel uses more of a creative word choice. Grendel’s book portrays the story better because of the detail in the story, the specific, smart, and variety of word choice that Grendel uses and lastly, the huge fight at the end of the story has much more detail and it creates images in the reader's head, it has more action and it made the fight more understandable. With all these things being said
The epic poem “Beowulf” translated by Burton Raffel and the novel “Grendel” by John Gardner both share the character Grendel, however both the poem and the novel tell different characterizations of Grendel.
“The monster’s thoughts were as quick as his greed or his claws: He slipped through the door there in the silence snatched up thirty men, smashed them…” (Raffel Lines 34-37) In other words, Grendel is characterized as a monster whose only desire is to kill. However, the humans chose to forget their beginning encounters with Grendel and don’t realize that they are the true cause. When Grendel tries to communicate with the humans because they speak the same language, he is repelled by the Danes. “The harper broke off, the people screamed. Drunken men rushed me with battle-axes. I sank to my knees, crying, “Friend! Friend!” (Gardner 52) In other words, Grendel wants to be friends with the humans but they immediately judge him based on his appearance and reject him. This causes Grendel now have become isolated from both the humans and animals. This isolation leads to Grendel to start killing the humans as a form of interaction. Sadly like with animals, the only form of communication with the humans Grendel will receive is through killing them like the Grendel we see in Beowulf. Overall, due to Grendel being surrounded by humans who misjudge him, he is motivated by isolation in which the only attention he will get is from killing
In the poem Beowulf by Seamus Heaney and the novel Grendel by John Gardner both characters demonstrate characteristics of a monster, while also demonstrating human qualities. Such as their actions and thought processes, making them both guilty for having some inner monster with a hint of being like a human.
Grendel is the embodiment of all that is evil and dark. He is a descendant of Cain and like Cain is an outcast of society. He is doomed to roam in the shadows. He is always outside looking inside. He is an outside threat to the order of society and all that is good. His whole existence is grounded solely in the moral perversion to hate good simply because it is good.
Grendal, a descendant of Cain, is one of the main antagonist of the poem Beowulf. He lives under an inherited curse and is denied God’s presence. Throughout the story Grendal causes enormous grief and fear to the people of Herot. After so much pain and agony the king of Herot, Hrothgar, sends for the protagonist of the poem, Beowulf. He is a Geat and the epic hero of the poem. The wide variety of distinctions between Grendal and Beowulf is what develops the climax of the composition. Beowulf kills Grendal, so he is honored by the people of Herot for his heroic act. Since Grendal and Beowulf play opposite roles in the poem, Beowulf, they let the reader know how contrasting characters can develop the plot of the story.