Should Steroids Be Allowed In Sports

1821 Words4 Pages

Today the sports world is being overtaken by performance enhancing drugs. Steroids have been around for many years, and yet people are still using these drugs to be the best they can be, when they know that it is unfair to the athletes that are not using these drugs. Steroids have many effects such as androgenic effects, but can also create easy muscle building due to the testosterone put into the drug. “Brown-Sequard injected himself with an extract from the testes of guinea pigs and dogs. In 1889, he reported to the scientific community in Paris that these extracts increased his strength and alertness” (“Freedman, 8”). “Synthetic anabolic steroids, the same anabolic steroids we have available today have been used in competitive sports since the 1950's, …show more content…

Some athletes that are not the best in their league, decide the use performance enhancing drugs to up their game. For the other players in the league it is unfair to them, because the player using steroids, now has the spot light. “...Athletes do not take these drugs to level the playing field, they do it to get an advantage” (“Should Performance Enhancing Drugs (such as steroids) be accepted in sports?”). How is this fair when that athlete is using a drug? When Alex Rodriguez or Lance Armstrong were using performance enhancing drugs, they were some of the best players in their sports. Alex was hitting home runs every game during the time he used performance enhancing drugs. Lance Armstrong won seven Tour de France championships in his prime, also during the time he used performance enhancing drugs. It was not fair to the competitors of these athletes; however, they both got a very large punishment due to their stupid acts of using drugs. In many interviews when they got asked, “Was using performance enhancing drugs worth it?”, they both said no. Athletes who have once used these drugs in their professional careers, have all been

Open Document