Should People Be Allowed To Make Medical Decisions About Children

2323 Words5 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Bioethics Quizlet

Where should we draw the line when it comes to parental decisions regarding children? Is it acceptable to refuse medical treatment for a child because of religious reasons? This has been a bioethical dilemma in the health care field for many years. If you were a parent and your child was dying and needed medical treatment, would you have strong enough faith to believe that prayer alone could cure your child? Should anyone be willing to gamble ones life on faith when there are clear alternatives? Most people like to believe that when making medical decisions the one that results in the chance of survival is the one chosen. But as we look at a few cases we discover that others choose what they believe to be their faith over medical treatment, ultimately resulting in death. There is an old tale passed down regarding religion and the medical field. “There’s a man who’s stuck on a boat in the water when a vicious storm occurs. The lifeguard tries to save him, but the man says no, my God will save me! The man on the boat continues to pray and tell God how wonderful he is and how he has faith that he will save him from the storm. The lifeguard throws rafts out toward the man to save him, but the …show more content…

A practitioner from the church visited and “healed” by praying and singing to him. His symptoms persisted for days following. On April 8th he began to have spasms, his eyes rolled back, and he lost consciousness. Later that night Robyn died. After further evaluation doctors diagnosed him as having a correctable bowel obstruction (Common Wealth v. Twitchell). These children’s lives could have easily been saved; death could have been avoided. The parents are getting off easy for what is manslaughter in all reality. They have the option to save their child’s life but refuse to. As a parent it is their duty to protect their children, they are not fulfilling this

Show More
Related

  • A Medical Case Study on Charlotte Wyatt by the BBC

    1599 Words  | 4 Pages

    This case was taken into the British court system where, after a long trial, a judge upheld the doctor’s decision not to resuscitate. The reasoning was that the judge felt he could not order the doctors to perform actions that would cause increased suffering for the child. After considering the doctrines of the sanctity of life and the...

    Read More

  • Cruz Vs Missouri Department Of Health Case Summary

    1752 Words  | 4 Pages

    Who would you trust with your life? In the case of the Cruzan vs Missouri Department of Health the question comes into play, do parents have the ability to choose between life and death circumstances for their child? In Missouri on Jan. 11, 1983, as Nancy Beth drove home from her job at a cheese factory in Carthage, Mo. On that day she was in a really bad automobile accident. She had been in what doctors described as an beyond repair vegetative state. Her car tipped over and she had got ejected from the car, she was found in the ditch by paramedics and they tried to save her heart for fifteen minutes. Luckily people got there in time, but was it really in time to save her life. She was found face down in a ditch, and paramedics restarted her heart. But because she had stopped breathing for about 15 minutes, she suffered severe brain damage. The car accident was so bad it left her in a vegetative state and Missouri state hospital claimed she was brain dead. She was kept alive by machines, a feeding tube, and a respirator. The

    Read More

  • Medical Ethics Case Study Douglas Diekema

    697 Words  | 2 Pages

    When a patient’s/family’s religious beliefs go against recommended medical treatment, it brings up an ethical issue. If the patient is a minor, this makes the case even more complex. In such a case, the parents would need to be evaluated to see if they were properly representing their child’s best interest. Depending on the child’s age, the child would need to be consulted to see if he/she meets the criteria of having the capacity to make his/her own medical decisions. Finally, the physician needs to be consulted to determine what his/her beliefs are on the case and under what circumstances would he be willing to perform the surgery.

    Read More

  • Killings: A Father's Love for his Child

    289 Words  | 1 Pages

    The actions that a parent takes in order to protect or support their child cannot be judged in a courtroom, because parents cannot describe the way that they feel knowing that their offspring is gone forever. In a court of law, Matthew Fowler should be tried for justifiable homicide, and he should possibly plead temporary insanity. A parent cannot control their violent actions, because the feelings that one feels towards a child is much stronger than any other emotion could ever be. Frank Fowler's life was taken in a horrific and traumatic matter, and for this, a parent cannot undergo the normal mourning process. A parent like Matthew Fowler could not go through each day knowing that their child's murderer is walking the streets freely. A mother, like Ruth Strout, would go crazy seeing that heartless person do everyday things that her son/daughter can no longer do. This would drive a person to temporary insanity, causing them to lash out and kill the murderer. Matthew Fowler had reason to kill Richard Strout, even if it would result in hurting Matthew in the end.

    Read More

  • Euthanasia Essay - Lutheranism and Doctor-Assisted Suicide

    1504 Words  | 4 Pages

    Which decisions about dying are morally acceptable to concernd Christians, and which ones go beyond morally acceptable limits? Which medical practices and public policies allow for more humane treatment for those who are dying and which ones open the door to abuse and the violation of human dignity? Proposals in various states to legalize physician-assisted death [3] point to renewed interest in these old questions. ELCA members, congregations, and institutions need to address these questions through prayer and careful reflection.

    Read More

  • Decisions from Health Care Providers

    579 Words  | 2 Pages

    Patients are ultimately responsible for their own health and wellbeing and should be held responsible for the consequences of their decisions and actions. All people have the right to refuse treatment even where refusal may result in harm to themselves or in their own death and providers are legally bound to respect their decision. If patients cannot decide for themselves, but have previously decided to refuse treatment while still competent, their decision is legally binding. Where a patient's views are not known, the doctor has a responsibility to make a decision, but should consult other healthcare professionals and people close to the patient.

    Read More

  • Children Deaths from Faith-Healing

    728 Words  | 2 Pages

    It is estimated that around a dozen U.S. children will die in faith-healing cases each year. Typically associated with Christianity, Faith healing is founded on the belief that certain people or places have the ability to cure and heal sickness, disease, or injuries. Typically this “healing” is associated by a close connection to a higher power through prayer, divine intervention, or the ministration of an individual who claims himself as a healer. Faith has been scientifically proven in the field psychology to yield benefits to health. Although faith has promised a greater wellbeing for many individual’s lives, it has yet to be a significant replacement for medication many people but relaying on faith as a means for medication.

    Read More

  • Abortion: Why Doctors Should have the Right to Refuse

    1690 Words  | 4 Pages

    The First Amendment states, “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.” This amendment to our Constitution guarantees the citizens of the United States of America the right to live according to their belief system and values and not have the government interfering and dictating how they are to conduct themselves. This amendment grants us freedom to do as we please as long as it is in the confines of being legal. If the activity is illegal we, obviously, must face the consequences of our actions. Throughout the abortion debate there have been many differing opinions in regards to a woman’s right to chose to terminate her pregnancy. Abortion is one of those rights, which is protected according to the Supreme Court, in the United States Constitution. One aspect that I have not thought of until researching a topic for this paper is the rights of the physician to refuse performing an abortion. Upon researching this issue, I discovered some people that would like to limit doctors First Amendment rights. With the United States Constitution to back them up, doctors should have the right to refuse performing abortions because it may be against their moral beliefs and their Hippocratic Oath, even though people tend to think that a woman’s right to an abortion supersedes the physician’s right because of the physician’s social status.

    Read More

  • Summary Of The Man In The Water By Roger Rosenblatt

    937 Words  | 2 Pages

    Even being fully aware of the certain outcome, he still does absolutely everything he can to save everybody he can before himself. With every person he saved, he was slowly getting closer to dying, “he watched everything in the world move away from him, and he deliberately let it happen.” The man in the water did not get discouraged in the way that most would if they knew they were going to die. He took on the impossible challenge of saving those people, and although in some ways he lost, he also won in an even bigger way. He could have chosen to save himself, but instead he chose the other people. He chose selfless over selfish, he proved that human nature has the capacity to be completely and utterly selfless rather than caring for themselves more than everything

    Read More

  • Right to Die

    1172 Words  | 3 Pages

    “If you don't get what you want, you suffer; if you get what you don't want, you suffer; even when you get exactly what you want, you still suffer because you can't hold on to it forever. Your mind is your predicament. It wants to be free of change. Free of pain, free of the obligations of life and death. But change is law and no amount of pretending will alter that reality” (Socrates ). Death. The means to an end. Game over. Do we as humans have a choice in the matter of choosing life or death, or is that all left up to a higher power? Which is a highly debatable question that has no exact answer. Where should we draw the line in deciding who has that right, the patients, after all it is their life, the family or should it be up to the doctors, the ones who have to partake in ending one’s life? When searching for the solution a person must contemplate their beliefs and the many perspectives of people who could possibility sway his/her choice. In doing so, patients religion, values, and traditions come into play. The main reason behind the argument is , what is suicide? "suicide is death caused by self-directed injurious behavior with any intent to die as a result of the behavior"(CDC). Conversely the option of death should be granted to a patient who is suffering from severe injuries or a situation involving a predicted death, unless otherwise stated in their wishes beforehand.

    Read More

  • Reasons for Having Children: Savior Siblings

    1413 Words  | 3 Pages

    I believe that parents are not morally justified in having a child merely to provide life saving medical treatment to another child or family member, but that this does not mean that the creation of savior siblings is morally impermissible. By having a child solely to provide life saving medical treatment, you are treating this child merely as a means rather than an end to the individual child. By having the child solely as a means to save another, you are violating this savior sibling in that you are treating them as a source of spare parts that can be used by the sickly child in order to solely promote the prolonged life of the currently sick child. This view that having a child merely as a way to provide medical treatment does not consider the multitude of other avenues that this newborn child can take, and presupposes that the child will only be used for the single purpose of providing life saving medical treatment through use of stems cells or organ donation. What this view fails to consider is that these savior siblings are valued by families for so much more than just as a human bag of good cells and organs that can be used to save the life of the original child. Instead, these savior siblings can be valued as normal children themselves, in that they can be valued in the same way that any other child who is born is valued, yet at the same time they will also be able to provide life-saving treatment to their sibling. My view runs parallel to the view held by Claudia Mills who argues that it is acceptable to have a savior sibling, yet at the same time we can not have a child for purely instrumental motives, and instead should more so value the child for the intrinsic worth that they have. Mills presents her argument by puttin...

    Read More

  • Canadian Ethical Issues

    1024 Words  | 3 Pages

    Religion holds a strong grip concerning the ethical issues in healthcare. Through the Bible we have the ability to learn what God believes to be ethical as well as unethical in healthcare. The Church’s views have developed with society, however, they have also remained unchanged on certain decisions on this topic. For instance, the churches point of views on euthanasia and stem cell research have not been improved under the influence of society, remaining the same for decades and most likely decades to come. Scriptures written by the church state the belief “Thou shall not kill” (Exodus 20:13), contradicting the act of both euthanasia and stem cell research.

    Read More

  • Medical Ethics

    776 Words  | 2 Pages

    Physician-assisted suicide refers to the physician acting indirectly in the death of the patient -- providing the means for death. The ethics of PAS is a continually debated topic. The range of arguments in support and opposition of PAS are vast. Justice, compassion, the moral irrelevance of the difference between killing and letting die, individual liberty are many arguments for PAS. The distinction between killing and letting die, sanctity of life, "do no harm" principle of medicine, and the potential for abuse are some of the arguments in favor of making PAS illegal. However, self-determination, and ultimately respect for autonomy are relied on heavily as principle arguments in the PAS issue.

    Read More

  • Minors Should Not Make Medical Decisions

    1119 Words  | 3 Pages

    17 year old Cassandra, a minor from Connecticut who suffers from Hodgkin lymphoma, can legally be forced to undergo chemotherapy after she explicitly expressed that she does not want the treatment. The Connecticut Supreme Court ruled that she was to have no say in the decision. A minor’s right in a medical decision is a controversial issue in today’s society. Many states have laws that allow minors to make their own medical decisions, while others are strictly against it. Minor decision advocates argue that if the minor seems to have a full understanding of their decision, then it should be carried out.

    Read More

  • Healthcare and Religious Beliefs

    890 Words  | 2 Pages

    In healthcare organizations, medical staff must conform to their hospital and their country’s code of conduct. Not only do they have to meet set standards, they must also take their patient into consideration. When making a decision upon a patient, medical staff must recognize religious backgrounds and spiritual beliefs. By understanding a patients’ beliefs and their belief system, a medical worker can give the patient their deserved medical assistance without overstepping boundaries or coming off as offensive. The practices and beliefs of four religions will be articulated throughout this essay to fully understand how religion can either help or hinder the healing process.

    Read More

More about Should People Be Allowed To Make Medical Decisions About Children

Open Document