Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Justification for the death penalty
Justification for the death penalty
Justification for the death penalty
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Justification for the death penalty
Should Physicians be allowed to participate in the Death Penalty?
The Death Penalty is starting to become natural in the United States. More and More states in the U.S are starting to use the death penalty, yet they don't understand that it is a cruel punishment. While some believe in the saying "Eye for an Eye" they believe the death penalty should be in affect because they believe that the pain will be over if the person that caused it is gone. One of the executions from the death penalty is Lethal Injection. That procedure requires a physician because the prison guards aren't trained in medicine to know how to properly inject someone. Physicians shouldn't be allowed to play a role in an execution. The Death penalty was influenced by Britain to America when European settlers came to the new world and brought capital punishment with them. The first ever execution was in 1608 and captain George Kendall was executed for being a spy for Spain. Back in those times people could be executed for striking a person mother or father or for denying god as the true god. Crimes that automatically put a person on death row were changed. Thomas Jefferson revised a bill to propose that Capital
…show more content…
“the doctors who were willing to discuss it say that they view it, in a way, as similar to terminal illness.” (Alper). The doctors take in the prisoner and consider them as their patient and they make sure that they are in the most comfort before starting the procedure. The doctors also think of helping in the executions as relief for the prisoner especially of all the stress from thinking about it. “And they can relieve suffering, and that they feel that it's their duty to relieve suffering.” (Alper). The doctors feel as if sometimes they don’t have a choice but to help especially after knowing what that person is about to
In the words of Jack Kevorkian “In quixotically trying to conquer death doctors all too frequently do no good for their patients’ “ease” but at the same time they do harm instead by prolonging and even magnifying patients’ dis-ease.”. His excellent quote shows one that mercy killing can help a person stop suffering with a prolonged death.In Stienbecks novella Of Mice And Men Lennie falls victim to his impulses and makes himself suffer and George suffer the concequences. George reveals how mercy killing is necessary in some cases because it stops suffering, prevents worse from happening, and may help society continue working.
Only the patient wouldn’t have to suffer as long. On the other hand, physical pain is not the only form of suffering. One must take into consideration the patient’s mental health. When the patient knows they are going to die and they understand more pain and suffering are to come, the more humane way would be to let the patient choose to die peacefully. Also, a patient that is psychologically suffering could decide to end their lives in a non-peaceful manner.
American colonies were introduced to the practice of capital punishment, through European colonization. The offenses punishable by the death penalty in each colony varied from stealing, to denying the existence of God. Ceasre Beccaria’s 1776 essay, titled On Crimes and Punishment acted as the chief catalyst behind the abolition movement against the death penalty. In his essay, Beccaria asserted that the death penalty deprives men of life, true deterrence resulted from imprisoning criminals and using this as an example to show the value of freedom and laws, and that the death penalty be used only in cases of treason. Beccaris’s rationalism induced Thomas Jefferson to attempt the first reform effort in the United States of America. Jefferson proposed a bill to Virginia under which capital punishment was only applicable to murder and treason. Although the bill was defeated by a single vote, Jefferson’s hope for reform still persists through modern day reformists. Currently, the debate over capital punishment rages on with fervor on both ends. Those in favor of capital punishment find it necessary in deterring future murders, the right way of punishing murders, bringing closure to victims, and for making society feel safer. Although their argument seems sound, after scrutiny it can be asserted that it is in fact irrational. The death penalty is an improper way of punishing criminal as it is barbaric, immoral in taking life, and flawed.
America adopted the use of the death penalty from Britain when the European settlers came to the new world. The first recorded execution in the new colonies was of Captain
Capital punishment barely made its way into American society. In Britain, public executions were festive and frequent in the 15th century. At the same time a movement to abolish the death penalty gained support throughout Europe. In 1753, Russia became the first important nation to ban the death penalty. The English instilled the death penalty upon America when it was just a colony. Ben Franklin opposed the death penalty as he helped write the Bill of Rights and the well alluded to 8th Amendment. In 1846 Michigan was the first to repeal capital punishment. By 1917, ten states had repealed capital punishment.
Over the years the ways executions are performed have changed significantly to be less gruesome, Though even with these changes capital punishment still remains as inhumane and unconstitutional as it was before and effecting the lives of several people. The eighth amendment holds a strong cases against capital punishment. According to the University of Minnesota Human Rights Library the eighth amendment states “excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted”. When our country allows these executions to continue it is allowing our rights to be trampled, no one deserves to be treated inhumanely. Beyond our constitutional rights being trampled, there has also been an extreme shortage in the three step drugs used in executions due to Pharmaceutical companies not wanting to be part of killing when there sole purpose is to provide to help people survive. That leaves one with the question, if there is a shortage in these drugs how are facilities still administering lethal injections? The answer is simple. “States are now buying drugs from illegal sources, ordering new ones from compounding ph...
The patient might just be waiting for the disease they have caught to kill them, but it does not always go so quickly . ¨Ending a patient's life by injection, with the added solace that it will be quick and painless, is much easier than this constant physical and emotional care¨ (Ezekiel Emanuel, 1997, p. 75). If a patient is terminally ill and will not get better, it allows them to end the suffering. If the physician has to keep a constant eye on the patient and they need constant care and the patient is not getting better, the option is there if they want to end all of it they can. Sometimes dealing with all of the physical care like medications and not being able to live completely normal with a disease is hard. It can get extremely hard and stressful that all the patients can think about doing is ending it, this alternative gives the patient a painless option. According to Somerville (2009), ¨… respect for people's rights to autonomy and self determination means everyone has a right to die at a time of their choosing¨ ( p.4). The patient deserves to choose whether they want to keep fighting or if they cannot go any farther. The patient should not have to push through a fight they have been fighting and know they cannot win. According to Kevorkian ¨the patient decides when it's best to go.¨ Nobody tells the patient when they have to end their lives, they understand their body and know
Narration: According to historians, the first person who tried to restrict the use of the death penalty in the United States was Thomas Jefferson of the Virginia Colony.
Terminally ill patients should have the legal option of physician-assisted suicide. Terminally ill patients deserve the right to control their own death. Legalizing assisted suicide would relive families of the burdens of caring for a terminally ill relative. Doctors should not be prosecuted for assisting in the suicide of a terminally ill patient. We as a society must protect life, but we must also recognize the right to a humane death. When a person is near death, in unbearable pain, they have the right to ask a physician to assist in ending their lives.
In the eighteenth century, King Hammurabi of Babylon was the first to introduce the death penalty, and others were quick to follow. The death penalty later became the only punishment for all crimes in Britain. Methods for punishment included crucifixion, drowning, beatings, burning alive and impalement. Although these methods did not last long, by the Tenth Century A.D., hanging became the more common method used. When Europeans first settled in America they brought along with them capital punishment. Captain George Kendall was the first to be executed in America in the Jamestown Colony of Virginia in 1608, for being a spy for Spain. His execution then led to the Divine, Moral and Martial laws enacted by Virginia Governor, Sir Thomas Dale.
The very first legal executions came in the United States was during the Revolutionary War against Great Britain. British soldiers hung the first person to die by the death penalty, Nathan Hale, for espionage (Farrell).
Physician Assisted Murder & nbsp ; Physician assisted suicide is illegal in all states except Oregon. Physician assisted suicide is defined by Religious Tolerance.org. A physician supplies information and/or the means of committing suicide to a person, so that they can easily terminate their own life. The decision of when and where the time of our death should occur is one that only God has the right to decide. Because no person or doctor has the right to end a life, physician assisted suicide should be illegal.
To start off, I will discuss the history of the death penalty. The first established death penalty laws date as far back as the Eighteenth Century B.C. in the code of King Hammaurabi of Babylon, which codified the death penalty for 25 different crimes. Death sentences were carried out by such means as crucifixion, boiling, beheading, drowning, beating to death, burning alive, and impalement.
Physicians that do choose to engage should at the very least oversee the operation and training. Having ill suited personnel perform the lethal injections could result in a situation such as the botched execution of Clayton Lockett. Let alone the fact that prisoners to be executed may have valid argument in claiming that if the procedure is not carried out or at least supervised by a physician it would be cruel and unusual punishment if administered by non-medically trained corrections officers. This does not guarantee that there will never be any troubled executions, but it does reduce this risk
The heaviest punishment towards convicts is death penalty in law. It means to atone for an offense is dead. Of course, it will not execute for every criminal. Death penalty is only for felons. For example, a people who murdered someone would not get the death penalty. The death penalty is for murders who related to the smuggling of aliens or committed during a drug-related drive-by shooting. Sometimes, however, the felons also can avoid the death because some countries (or actually states) don’t allow death penalty. Then, what decision would the convict get? It is a life sentence, which means the prisoner should be in a prison until he or she dies. However, it is not good idea to keep felons. Death penalty should be allowed and get more active because life sentence is costly, unsafe, and insincere for a victim and the family.