Archetypes In Sherlock Holme

1584 Words4 Pages

Sherlock Holmes first appeared in A Study in Scarlet, which was published in November 1887 in Beeton’s Christmas Annual. This short story was the first of what would eventually comprise of sixty mysterious adventures featuring the famous detective and his faithful sidekick, Doctor John Watson. Between 1887 and 1927, Sir Arthur Conan Doyle produced fifty-six short stories and four novels describing their escapades together. Despite attempting several times to kill off Sherlock Holmes, Sir Arthur Conan Doyle was constantly obliged to revive him in order to satisfy an unquenchable public appetite for detective mysteries; The Final Problem is an example of an endeavor to execute Holmes. The detective held an enduring fascination for his late-Victorian …show more content…

His incredible popularity is both historically specific and in a contradictory sense, broadly generic. He, Mr. Sherlock Holmes, is inseparable from a particular historical moment at the end of the Victorian era, and has undergone a process of circulating through a wide range of pop cultural contexts, which functions as both a detective archetype and a kind of popular metaphor for ideas and qualities associated with detection and detectives, such as perceptiveness, deductive reasoning and, of course, a kind of eccentric genius.
From the very first passage of A Study in Scarlet, Sherlock Holmes is an object of intense curiosity as Doctor John Watson tries to understand the quirks and habits of his recently developed relationship. Watson is discharged from the Army during the second Afghanistan War, and finds himself without employment or a home. “Under such circumstances I naturally gravitated to London, that great cesspool into which all the loungers and idlers of the Empire are irresistibly drained” (15). A mutual friend introduces Watson to Sherlock Holmes, who, coincidentally, is looking for a roommate. Watson moves in at 221B Baker Street soon: “As the weeks went by, my interest in him and my …show more content…

In A Study in Scarlet, Watson reads an academic paper on the subject, unaware that Holmes is the author: “The writer claimed by a momentary expression, a twitch of a muscle or a glance of an eye, to fathom a man’s inmost thoughts. Deceit, according to him, was an impossibility in the case of one trained to observation and analysis” (23). Watson later gets an opportunity to observe this theory in practice, when Holmes studies the scene of a murder and deduces at once that the suspect “was more than six feet tall, was in the prime of life, has small feet for his height, wore coarse, square-toed boots and smoked a Trichinopoly cigar” (32). Holmes’s deduction combines the methodologies of criminal detection with those of medical diagnosis and forensic analysis, which profile an individual body by reading its symptoms or reconstructing its physical details based on material clues and signs (Ruitenbeek). Holmes’s technique is indebted to a number of nineteenth-century discourses, including the ideas of Cesare Lombroso (1835-1909), whose theory of anthropological criminology held that criminality was an inherited condition and that the criminal type could be identified by various physical traits (Yang). Lombrosian theories of reoccurring traits were soon replaced in academic circles, but the theoretical

Open Document