Seed Patents Are Unethical

490 Words1 Page

Seed Patents Are Unethical

Within the past 5 years seed companies like Monsanto, Syngenta, and Bayer have been dictating the seed industry. These companies have been trying to patent their seed so that farmers cannot save regrow the seed the following year. Many farmers have been fighting these companies’ patents because they think they are unethical. Seed patents are unethical because there would be no seed monopolies, there would be no argument between companies and farmers on who owns the seed, there would be no use of genetically modified seed preventing farmers from reusing their seed.

One of the biggest seed monopolies in the United States is Monsanto. Control of the seed industry is passing into fewer and fewer hands and Monsanto’s are the biggest. More than 80% of US corn and more than 90% of soybeans planted each year are attributable to Monsanto and monopoly comes to mind (gmeducation.org). Monopolization of the seed supply has led to major problems for farmers. One being that farmers have fewer choices between companies and varieties. Second farmers have to pay a lot more because that one company is dictating the seed industry. …show more content…

The seed is owned by the farmers. Farmers are the ones that raise the seed, and spend all that money on the seed to get it to produce at its highest level. Companies should not be able to patent the seed they sell. A seed is not an invention. That is why patents on seeds are illegitimate. Even in a genetically engineered crop, the original seed comes from farmers (seedfreedom.info). Companies that think they own the farmer’s seed have been sueing the farmers because they don't want them reusing it, but the farmer is the one who own the

More about Seed Patents Are Unethical

Open Document