Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Importance of learning science
Importance of learning science
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Importance of learning science
After being in class for just two weeks, I have already seen so many great ideas and have been given new insights on how science should be taught and why it is important. Science is different in its own way, and many students end up not liking it. This is not simply because of the material, but because they way it is being taught in schools. Science is seen as almost an afterthought, whenever it can be fitted in will suffice. The problem with this is that teachers then don’t spend time on their science lesson, it gets taken out if they need more time for something else, or it ends up just reading from a book or powerpoint and students taking notes. There are key concepts that teachers and administrators are overlooking that can make students …show more content…
I believe that science needs to be taught in the same way we had our station during class. This means that students will be going through an inquiry, challenged, and guided section of the lesson. While students do this I believe that teachers should be going through the 5 E’s. Inquiry as talked about in Foundations is “an approach to learning that involves a process of exploring the natural or material world, and that leads to asking questions, making discoveries, and rigorously testing those discoveries in the search for new understanding.” (Kluger-Bel, 2). When a lesson is started with exploration, students immediately become interested. They have questions, they talk about ideas, they want to know the answer. It is then the time where the teacher allows to student to explore and discover. The teacher can set up guiding points, but for the most part the students end up teaching themselves. Once the inquiry step is over, the students move onto the challenge. This is the place where they take everything they just learned in the inquiry and apply it. They are challenging themselves to now show they know the solution. Finally, the students end with the guided practice. The students get to explore already created materials or experiments. They are not required to make or do anything, but to look and explore. Their discussion is deeper because they know what they are talking about and what they have been thinking
Evolution and Creationism are both fact and theory but the question is which one should be taught in schools? Only a few school distracts have approved the teaching of evolution because it has more senitific evidence than creationism to prove that it is true. According to a new Gallup poll, just 39% of Americans believe in evolution. The Gallup polls also show that those Americans with higher education believe in the theory of evolution as opposed to those with only high school diplomas. The polls found that 74% Americans with post-graduate degrees believe in evolution theory compared to 21% of Americans with only high school diplomas. The Gallup polls suggest that the belief in the theory of evolution is associated with education. Evolution should be taught in schools because it has more scientific evidence to support it than creationism does. Also, public schools should not teach things that have to do with God, such as creationism, because the Constitution requires the separation of church and state. Finally, if we do not allow schools to teach evolution it would be a form censo...
Giving this opportunity, I can say when it comes to being a scientist my small teacher focuses more on the bigger picture than the actual findings of assignments. For example, during the Owl Pellet observation he focused more on the overall owl pellet like how it looked, smelled, etc. but instead of wanting to analyze what was inside of it. Realizing how much his focus normally is on the bigger pictures shows how much teachers should stress how important other things such as predictions, hypothesis, etc. are when it comes to analyzing science experiments.
This curriculum utilizes a form of learning called “guided discovery,” which allows students to learn by doing. Students are presented with a variety of situations and must make decisions on what to do in each case; these choices in turn affect future scenarios, similar to a choose-your-own-adventure book.
Throughout kindergarten to fifth grade I really do not have many memories of science in class. This may be from me simply not remembering, but I believe it is due to the incredible integration of my elementary school. There were no certain blocks of time dedicated to certain subject, all the subjects fed off each other and were more a cohesive gaining of knowledge of all subjects rather than focusing on one. In my current schooling I have learned how hard it can be to integrate all the subjects together, but my elementary school did it seamlessly which is a goal I will constantly be striving for.
Because of the constant changing, it is hard for students to grasp the meaning behind a certain topic. But, if you use your own experiences and trials by creating and testing models to learn about a topic, you understand how it works better. Ellen Granger the head of the Office of Science Teaching at Florida State University, published a study in 2012 that compared teacher- based teaching versus student-based teaching(learning by doing projects or hands-on activities). She ran this study on fourth and fifth grade students understanding space-science concepts. The text states in paragraph 27 that the researchers found that learning outcomes were higher for students who enrolled in science classes that were student-centered. Granger also ran a test later on and found out that hands-on learning also helps throughout all grades not just elementary or middle schools. Because of Edison's famous quote our schools have changed the way that students are being taught and help the students to learn new subjects more
.... In an exploratory play, children engage in observations, raising questions from their observations which can be explored further or which may involve more systematic investigation. Educators need to have confidence in exploration as an important part of the learning process of young children and to plan exploratory experiences. Children’s thinking skills in science can be enhanced through quality interaction. Through exploration, children will develop knowledge and understanding in different areas of knowledge in a holistic way. For young children the most effective roles involve the educators as a facilitator of learning rather than a presenter of knowledge. An exploratory approach can be looked upon as a form of discovery learning in which the educators and child negotiate an experience for the child, which is later evaluated by both of them (Rowland, 1984).
At the particular school that I was at they had a special teacher and room for science. I remember how excited the kids were each week for science and it made me want to make sure that I made science fun for the students as they learned and had hands-on experiences. This article reminds me of some the requirements that I also had as a pre-service teacher. All teachers need to have experience in the classroom to become better qualified and prepared to teach when graduating from school.
I wanted to find out what others thought about science classes, so talked to a few students taking high school science classes as well as some taking college classes, and received all positive things about the importance and significance of taking science classes. One high schooler said, "Science is on a spiritual level, without science there is no life, and without life, then what is there" while another added, "Science makes you think about the important stuff because it's in everything. I think it's really good to know even if you don't think so at the
For students to be involved in inquiry based learning science teachers have to help them obtain the information from different sources during the process so students stay on track. Gathering information is an important learning aspect of inquiry, as students need to read about a topic and apply this knowledge to their investigation. (Chiappetta, 1997).
Science teachers have placed a high value on “scientific” thinking in their classes for quite some time. Unfortunately in the not to recent past that meant cook book labs, scripted lessons and taught students a prescribed way to do the scientific method. This left little room for free thought, questions and independence on the part of the student. The American Association for the Advancement of Science reports that, science educators have worked to infuse scientific inquiry into the K–12 curriculum (1990). This may be true but the definition that science teachers’ use for inquiry has been evolving and developing since then. Today teachers struggle with gaining the interest of their students who are surrounded by a multimedia deluge of information and distractions. One way for teachers to implement inquiry in this environment is by the use of high interest socioscientific inquiry (SSI). Socioscientific inquiry uses serious ecological concerns and critical citizenship to develop the students’ scientific inquiry and social responsibilities. There are many roadblocks that get in the way of using inquiry in the science classroom the teachers must contend with such as pressure to perform on standardized tests, time, teacher preparation and in-service training and financial constraints. In the long run using (SSI), socioscientific inquiry will pay dividends for the students, teachers and our environment both at the local and global levels.
Enhancing the scientific literacy of students has been a goal of science educator for more than a century. Discussion of the aims of science education often begin with ‘scientific literacy’. Scientific literacy is a term that has been used since the late 1950s to describe a desired familiarity with science on the part of the general public (Deboer, G.E., 2000). Scientific literacy plays an important role in human daily life. Many definition have been put forward for scientific literacy. To define the scientific literacy many science educator as well as organization such as National Research Council (NRC) and American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) draw frameworks and tried to describe the characteristics
...o listen carefully to ensure that kids are discussing scientific ideas, not socializing. The teacher's role is to ensure that students achieve their primary goal: meaningful understanding of scientific concepts. The practices described in this article help bring this about in several ways. When instruction centers on students and focuses on hands-on experience with scientific phenomena, science class becomes an exciting place. When instruction concentrates on the investigation of current problems and issues through scientific inquiry, science class becomes a relevant and meaningful place. When instruction emphasizes the development of communication skills, science class becomes an invaluable place for preparing children to tackle the challenges of adulthood. And the education community owes it to its students to assess their academic progress fairly and accurately.
After finishing the teaching part of the lesson, I realized that not everything goes according to plan. For example, in our lesson plan, we had the explain portion detailed and outlined to teach students the technical terms of what they were seeing in the stations and other activities and make it a collaborative effort within groups to work with the vocabulary words. However, the teaching of the plan was not well executed. Also, I learned that teaching a topic does not have to be boring or just full of worksheets. Fun, engaging lab stations and interactive activities can fulfill the standards and requirements just as well, if not better, than basic worksheets and PowerPoint lectures. Lastly, I realized that lesson planning and teaching require a great deal of effort and work, but it is all worth it when a light bulb goes off in a students’ head and they learn something new and are excited to be learning and extend their science
In my autobiography, I explained that one of my motivations in becoming a science teacher is getting science to connect to students; having them realize that science can be interesting, important and worth learning. While re-reading my autobiography, I realized that I neglected the social aspects that come along with learning science and this course allowed me to become more aware of how social constructs can possibly interfere with students ' learning and attitude towards learning.
In Science, teachers serve as the facilitator of learning, guiding them through the inquiry process. Teachers must ask open-ended questions, allow time for the students to answer, avoid telling students what to do, avoid discouraging students’ ideas or behaviors, encourage to find solutions on their own, encourage collaboration, maintain high standards and order, develop inquiry-based assessments to monitor students’ progress, and know that inquiry may be challenging for some students so be prepared to provide more guidance. There are three types of Science inquiry: structured, guided, and open. Structured is the most teacher-centered form of inquiry. This type of inquiry is mainly seen in laboratory exercises where the teacher needs to provide structure, however the students are the ones who conduct the experiment and find conclusions. Guided inquiry is where the students are given tools to develop a process and find the results. As an example, the teacher would instruct the students to build a rocket, but not tell them how to design it. This leaves creativity and uniqueness for the students to be able to apply their knowledge and skills. Open inquiry is when students determine the problem, i...