Sacrifice Of Abraham Test

1404 Words3 Pages

The Sacrifice of Isaac

The biblical narrative, Abraham Tested, illustrates God’s test of Abraham to sacrifice his son, Isaac, as a burnt offering at the apex of the mountain Moriah. Isaac is given the sacrificial wood to carry and, after the pyre is built, is laid bound upon it with Abraham’s knife angled towards his throat to obey God’s command and complete the sacrifice. However, before Abraham’s knife can slaughter Isaac, an angel of God calls down from heaven in order to halt Abraham’s hand and instead sacrifice a ram which is provided by God. Within this essay the analysis of the socio-historical context, the theological liberationist interpretation of the text and the artist’s juxtaposing interpretations were explored in order to determine …show more content…

The most common exegesis which is accepted by many Christian scholars, such as Page (2002), John Wesley (2005) and Graul (2003), is one which suggests that the biblical story is a foreshadowing of God’s sacrifice of Jesus to save mankind. Another interpretation, as described by Kathryn Schifferdecker (2014), is an elaborate etiological narrative explaining the shift from human sacrifice to animal sacrifice. This provides a theological liberationist perspective upon the scripture, effectively showing the time of the axial age where religion turned from its primal ancestry of fear of external gods and towards discovering internal transcendence. This change is evident within the scripture, as just prior to Abraham performing the sacrifice he is stilled by the voice of “the angel of the LORD” (Genesis 22:11) commanding him to free Isaac. By taking a liberationist interpretation, the voice of the angel symbolises Abraham’s conscience and his transitioning of being liberated from the fear of external gods to obeying what is morally correct. And so, the text conveys an interpretation which has been affected by the socio-historical context of child sacrifice and also the theological liberationist interpretations at the time the scripture was being …show more content…

Caravaggio, 1571-1610, was a self-made artist whose pieces were categorised within the Baroque school of artwork due to their dramatic nature (Caravaggio Foundation, 2016). Caravaggio himself, however, was notorious for his aggressive behaviour which resulted in his arrest on multiple occasions while in Rome (The National Gallery, 2016). In 1606, these bouts of aggression allowed an argument between Caravaggio and another man to quickly evolve into a swordfight which ultimately ended with Caravaggio stabbing the man, therefore making a murderer of himself. This led to Caravaggio fleeing from Rome to Malta in order to escape judgement for his crimes, only to be later infected with a disease which resulted in his untimely death while within Malta (The National Gallery, 2016). However, Caravaggio’s The Sacrifice of Isaac falls directly into the Baroque style of artwork which, during the years surrounding 1603, was the dominant style of religious artwork within Rome. This was a result of the Council of Trent’s recommendation that the Catholic Church use art as a medium in which to counteract the effects of the Protestant Reformation occurring throughout Eastern Europe (Khan Academy, 2016). Michelangelo’s piece is intentionally created to be dramatic in order to appeal to both the senses and to emotions

Open Document