Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
role of fate in macbeth
role of fate in macbeth
how does fate guide the actions in macbeth
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: role of fate in macbeth
A tragedy imitates the emotional events of life by showing instead of telling. It does not have to be an exact replication of life, but instead have some realistic aspects to it. This type of play is special because an event in the plot is caused by a preceding choice or action performed by the character. Therefore, unlike a story where occurrences are caused by coincidences, a tragedy must have events that inescapably connect to one another as a result of the characters’ choices. Consequently, this idea of cause and effect must direct the plot of the play until the protagonists have an unfortunate end. Thus, the audience watching the tragedy will experience fear and pity for the characters since their actions will lead to their dramatic downfall. Similarily, William Shakespeare’s, Romeo and Juliet, conveys these fundamental ideas, but it mainly emphasizes on certain tragic concepts. These components, explained by Aristotle, certainly make this play a quintessence of tragedy. They support the chain of events in Romeo and Juliet by using character traits and majors events to connect the plot and illustrate how the characters create their own ending. For this reason, Romeo and Juliet is a genuine tragedy because of its use of significant, tragic elements; tragically-flawed protagonists; and inevitable fate.
Throughout the play there are many, highlighted tragic elements used to show how Romeo and Juliet’s lives are dramatically shaped into a tragedy. One important element is the anagnorisis: the point of time when a main character finally realizes that one of his decisions went too far, yet he is unable to fix it. For instance, when Romeo kills Tybalt out of pure abhorrence he responds regretfully, “O, I am fortune’s fool!” (III, ...
... middle of paper ...
...s that could be present in daily life. Hence, Romeo and Juliet may have some fictional components, but it still has the ability to mimic life, as explained by Aristotle.
Works Cited
Kerschen, Lois. “Critical Essay on Romeo and Juliet.” Drama for Students. Vol. 21. Ed. Anne Hacht. Detroit: Gale, 2005. 258-261.
McManus, Barbara. “Outline of Aristotle’s Theory of Tragedy in the POETICS.” CLS267: Greek Tragedy. November 1999. College of New Rochelle. 20 May 2010. < http://www. cnr.edu/home/bmcmanus/poetics.html>.
Moulton, Richard. "Innocence and Pathos: The Tragedy of Romeo and Juliet." Drama for Students. Vol. 21. Ed. Anne Hacht. Detroit: Gale, 2005. 271-273.
Shakespeare, William. The Tragedy of Romeo and Juliet. Prentice Hall Literature: Timeless Voices, Timeless Themes. Ed. Kate Kinsella, et al. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall, 2002. 770-874.
The play is written for all types of audiences and is imagined to be set in Verona where religious, social and political context were strong. These aspects attracted the Elizabethan audiences. However, the setting used would only be relatable to the Elizabethan audiences. Baz Luhrmann acknowledges this and he created the adaptations, based on the same religious, social and political context as the play but changes the setting of the play. Leonardo DiCaprio, who played Romeo said, “The world created by Baz Luhrmann heightened everything and made it more dangerous, liberating and interesting.” The created world is appealing to modern audiences as it is more exciting and relatable to them. The context of the created world is the same as the context presented in Verona. The accessibility and the excitement that the modern audience experienced from Baz Luhrmann’s adaptation maintained the popularity of Romeo and Juliet.
Kerschen, Lios. “Critical Essay on ‘Romeo and Juliet’.” Drama for Students. Ed. Anne Marie Hacht. Vol. 21. Detriot: Gale, 2005. Literature Resource Center. Web. 4 Dec 2013.
In Shakespeare’s Tragedy of Romeo and Juliet, the lovers meet their doom, by scene iii of Act V. With their fatal flaw of impulsivity, Romeo and Juliet are ultimately to blame for their death. Contrarily, if it was not for the unintentional influence of the pugnacious Tybalt, the star-crossed lovers may have remained together, perpetually. To the audience, the deaths of Romeo and Juliet are already understood, for it is a Shakespearean tragedy. However, the causes, predominantly Romeo’s and Juliet’s fatal flaw of impulsivity and rashness, are as simple as Shakespearean writing. Though Romeo and Juliet are wholly to blame for their tragic suicides, in Act V scene iii, Tybalt is, in turn, responsible, as his combative spirit forced Romeo to murder him and Juliet to marry Paris.
As the leading characters, Romeo and Juliet both portray the flaw that ultimately leads to the resolution: impulsiveness. Portrayed as emotional throughout the play, Romeo’s hamartia came to play in his vengeful state: “And fire-eyed fury be my conduct now...Either thou or I, or both, must go with him.” (3.1.117-122). Shakespeare’s characterization of Romeo as
...d Juliet's suicide is the result of Act III, Scene I's shift in genres. The death of Mercutio provokes a change from comedy to tragedy but it is Romeo's actions that sustain the tragedy. Although Tybalt's murder reinforces the tragedy, it results in another change in the play. His death changes the course of the play as the family feud becomes increasingly serious. This further complicates the situation for Romeo and Juliet since now their love is forbidden even more than it was before. They cannot reveal their marriage, thus, their attempt to reconcile the families fail. All of this stems from the events in Act III, Scene I. Therefore, it can be concluded that this scene is the most critical scene in Romeo and Juliet.
The final tragic moment in the story serves as an inevitable consequence of character flaws. One of Shakespeare’s most palpable tragic elements in this play is harmatia. Both Romeo and Juliet contain an overriding, single flaw that causes the downfall of the play. The intensity of Juliet’s love for Romeo is the only blemish of the young girl. Nevertheless, a single blemish leads to devastation in a tragedy. This extreme love causes her to go against her family and make decisions that come to harm her: “I’ll to the Friar to know his remedy./ If all else fail, myself have power to die” (III, v, 243-244). Juliet goes against her family solely for one reason; she is averse to marry Paris because of her extreme love and loyalty to Romeo. Her opposition to Paris causes her to make the decision to die which brings about the tragic ending. Furthermore, Romeo also contributes to bringing about the tragic end...
Romeo and Juliet are madly in love with each other and will go to any lengths to be together.
...Romeo and Juliet’s “intention” was to live a happy life of love, but things take a dramatic turn when Romeo kills a prominent member of his lover’s family and is banished. The lovers ultimately both die. This change of tides in the play make the drama an Aristotelian tragedy.
Romeo and Juliet is a true Aristotelian tragedy because the characters have tragic flaws, an anagnorisis, and the affects of minor characters. To start of Romeo and Juliet’s tragic flaw is that their love is too good for our world. As it says in an article by Thrasher, Romeo and Juliet’s love is “too perfect and passionate for their world” (79). Romeo and Juliet love each other so much that this causes their downfall and eventually their deaths. Love is passionate and Romeo and Juliet’s love is pure and far to good for our world. Romeo and Juliet each also have an anagnorisis. An anagnorisis is recognizing of a reversal of fortune. This happens for Romeo when he cries out “O, I am fortune’s fool!” (III, I, 130). He realizes his mistake that changed his life. Romeo realizes his bad fortune and the fact that “fortune” is playing games with him. JULIETS AGNORISIS. The affect of minor characters also makes Romeo and Juliet a true Aristotelian tragedy. Friar Lawrence and the Prince play very important roles in the play. Friar Lawrence marries Romeo and ...
Romeo and Juliet is regarded as one of William Shakespeare’s most tragic love stories, which has its influence on many aspects of the entertainment industry. In the context of this play, there are uncertainties surrounding whether the fatalities occur as a result of free will or under the uncontrollable force of fate. Through Romeo and Juliet’s premeditated encounter, Shakespeare indicates that fate is primarily responsible for love at first sight. Simultaneously, Romeo and Juliet are also portrayed as victims of their own destiny which induces their misfortunes and deaths. Apart from being one of the major themes, fate is also a main contributor to the outcome of the play.
One might think of a tragedy being a terrible and destructible event in one’s life that causes great pain and may contain great loss. One particular play written by William Shakespeare – one of the most well known poets in history, happens to be a tragedy-filled story. Othello, the Moor of Venice, set during the captivating renaissance era portrays a character named Othello who reveals characteristics of a tragic hero. The brilliant philosopher Aristotle from the fourth century B.C. developed his own definition and idea of what a tragic hero is. Eric Engle, author of “Aristotle, Law and Justice: The Tragic Hero,” said, Due to Aristotle’s influence, his tragic flaw has distorted western thought ever since its conception” (Engle). “The enquiry of whether Othello is a true tragic hero is debatable. Aristotle’s definition of a tragic hero was a protagonist who is socially superior to others, but then has a downfall due to a “tragic flaw,” typically caused by the character’s solitary weakness. Due to Aristotle’s definition of a tragic hero, Othello possesses the qualities from his definition that fulfill the role of being a tragic hero.
bliss. I will do this by examining and comparing William Shakespeare's plays; Romeo and Juliet
When one hears the word tragedy, one can assume that the human emotions are responsible for the collapse of an individual. To the Greek philosopher Aristotle, however, a tragedy is “an imitation of an action of high importance…in language enhanced by distinct and varying beauties…[or] by means of pity and fear effecting its purgation of these emotions” (Kennedy & Gioia, 945). He defined a tragic hero as having three common characteristics: hamartia, or the tragic flaw in the character which coupled with hubris (pride which results in overconfidence) causes his downfall and demise; katharsis, the purgation of the audience’s emotions, which causes the audience to feel “not depressed, but somehow elated”; and anagnorisis, or the recognition of some fact not previously realized by the true identity of the main character (Kennedy & Gioia, 946). Therefore, as defined by Aristotle’s concept of tragedy, William Shakespeare’s Othello could be classified as a tragic hero. Shakespeare’s play includes jealousy and intrigue, which intertwined with pride and suspense create the finest of Aristotelian tragedies. Othello complies with the requirements for a tragic hero as Aristotle began with the premise that the hero must be of “high estate,” as if he were the member of a royal family; however, he yet falls from a hierarchy of power to one of abashment. He has married the daughter of a Venetian nobleman. He starts out well, but his end is one of drama. Moreover, Shakespeare’s plot develops as Othello’s katharsis is revealed through the climax and conclusion of the play, while the anagnorisis with the recognition that Iago was a traitor and Desdemona his innocent victim.
An Aristotelian tragedy includes many different characteristics. It is a cause-and-effect chain and it contains the elements of catharsis, which is pity and fear, and hamartia, which is the tragic flaw embedded in the main characters. The famous play Romeo and Juliet, written by William Shakespeare, is about two lovers of two different families who hate each other and the misdemeanors they have to surpass. Many debate on whether it is an Aristotelian tragedy or simply tragic. Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juliet should be regarded as an Aristotelian tragedy because catharsis is exhibited in the play, Juliet’s blindness of love is shown, and Romeo’s impetuousness is the tragic flaw that leads to his demise.
by her father and his choice of husband for her - she could run away