Role Of Suffering In John Steinbeck's 'Of Mice And Men'

606 Words2 Pages

If a friend’s life was on the line, would it be better to let them suffer or do whatever it takes to end that suffering? These are some of the questions faced in John Steinbeck’s novella, Of Mice and Men. It was acceptable for what George Milton did to Lennie Small at the end of the book. George should be able to kill Lennie because he was suffering because of him. George killed Lennie because that was in the best interest to protect himself. In addition, it was Justified that George could kill Lennie without an uproar because George’s future was in danger. In addition Lennie would never be able to survive without George, and Lennie would have suffered if Curley had killed him instead.

Lennie always was getting into trouble, therefore it was affecting George’s source of work and income. The text said, “ God a ’mighty, if I was alone I could live so easy. I could get a job an’ work, an’ no trouble” (Steinbeck 11). This quote shows that George loved Lennie, but he always got on George’s nerves. George lost every job he had with Lennie right on his back. George could be a free man and not have to take care of another person, except himself. …show more content…

Although, Lennie could not control his actions and he forgot a lot of things, which tied into his strength made him a threat to other people. George knew Lennie was not stable to live on his own in any circumstances, which made George probably think back to how did his Aunt Clara take care of him. George had to take Lennie when his Aunt Clara died, which made George slow down since he did take care of a baby while he was a migrant worker. In the end of Steinbeck's novella, it reminds us that we might be responsible for another person's life someday, even if they make poor choices. When the time comes for that day, hopefully you will have a question for yourself and that is, “ Am I doing the right

Open Document