Roger Ebert's 'Love, Rosie' Movie Review

1154 Words3 Pages

Analyses on Roger Ebert’s ‘Love, Rosie’ movie review

From the opening paragraph it is clear that Roger Ebert is not a fan of the film - Stating that the movie not existing at all would not be a bad thing. This is effective as it lets the reader gain a sense of what direction this review is going in, letting them make a pre-judgment of the review and the film before going ahead and reading the main parts.

Moving on more into the review itself Roger Ebert states the tragedy of the love that continually misses each other “over a dozen years (Roger Ebert)”. The way he first mentions these implies that the story line of the film gets lost in the repetitive cycle creating an uncomfortable watch. But also creating a theme of the film helps the …show more content…

He also outlines a mishap in the story plot of Rosie naming two Boston study areas on separate occasions,one of which is in a separate location to what she was first trying to refer to. Roger Ebert then vaguely points out another issue in the story; the struggle and impossible manor of Rosie trying to keep her baby hidden from Alex - her best friend. But then quickly dismissing it stating that the film has “many other problems (Roger Ebert)”. This and other little language details such as “whatever (Roger Ebert)” in these situations shows the motion that Ebert is very dismissive and will not let any minor details or character attempts slide. Moreover, this point is backed up later on when Roger Ebert showcasing the factor of not actually seeing Alex “forge a medical career (Roger Ebert)” and that “we never actually see him studying or caring for patients (Roger Ebert)”. Which I see as an unnecessary factor to the story plot anyway, so whats the importance of it being included? As long as the viewers know what he’s studying and the location he is placed to not be with Rosie. So by outlining this point it is in my opinion that Ebert is mildly dramatic and hungry for all the - unnecessary - details, despite the factors that the producers are also having to stick to the running time of the film, therefore being limited to the scenes …show more content…

However Roger Ebert once again does this in a very dismissive tone.
He applauds Lily Collins and Sam Claflin on their acting - calling it “honest and effortless (Roger Ebert)”. Except then moving onto delivering his last comment on the poor and painful story with “you wish for them to end that streak, but not nearly enough. (Roger

Open Document