Robert Louis Stevenson Ethos Analysis

793 Words2 Pages

Stevenson also used ethos in his writing to appeal to his reader’s view. The author uses ethos to build his credibility with his audiences and show them that he is trustworthy, respectful, and authorized to talk about this subject. A great example of this is when the Stevenson gives his background story and reveals why he became a lawyer. Stevenson discloses that “[d]eveloping the skills to quantify and deconstruct the discrimination and inequality I saw became urgent and meaningful” (13). This explains that the author was motivated to learn about the discrimination and inequality that is going in the American court systems. Stevenson being a lawyer already give him the right to talk about this issue. Furthermore, Stevenson reveals, “I’ve represented …show more content…

court system, and wrongful incarceration and extreme punishment are only adding onto this already out of hand problem. Much of this has to blame on how we treat people based on their current economic status. After years of work Stevenson concludes, “Finally, I’ve come to believe that the true commitment to justice.. fairness, and equality cannot be measured by how we treat the rich... The true measure of our character is how we treat the poor, the disfavored, the accused, the incarcerated, and the condemned” (Stevenson 18). Nowadays, a very wealthy person who can afford a top-notch lawyer can get with away with never seeing inside walls of the prison while the poor who committed the same crime can end up living his entire life inside the prison walls. Stevenson wants his fellow lawyer, his intended audiences, to help the poor get the same treatment as a multi-millionaire would get in the court system. Stevenson also addresses other intended audiences which are the U.S. taxpayers by telling them how their money comes into the play regarding this problem. Stevenson informs the taxpayers that we spend $80 billion today from $6.9 billion in 1980 and with private prison builder demanding more people to be in prison, harsher punishment, and created now crime so they can make a more profit. The government is forced to spend more money on incarcerated people instead of improving public services, education, health, and welfare (Stevenson

Open Document