Rhetorical Analysis Of The Perils Of Indifference

1315 Words3 Pages

On April 12th, 1999, Elie Wiesel, Nobel Peace Prize winner and Holocaust survivor, delivered his “The Perils of Indifference” speech that contributed to the “Millennium Lecture series” hosted by leaders of the White House in Washington D.C. Going into detail about how “indifference” had left severe impact on the world, especially during critical times such as the two world wars and several civil wars, the dedicate activist attempted to inform his officials audience about the heavy cost of turning away as well as to persuade the political crews out of such “inhuman” actions.
Throughout the speech, Weisel employed pathos to the fullest extent by means of subjective experiences, relational scenarios, powerful diction, irony, and rhetorical questions.
At the beginning of his speech, the peace devotee took himself as the specific instance by telling a short narrative about how his young Jewish self went through the war with mental scars that remained to never heal. Since it was rooted from Weisel’s own experience, the story appeared more credible to the higher-up audience as he described his emotions vividly without fearing to leave disingenuous impression. Words that …show more content…

By giving examples of what negative impact “indifference”, specifically in the war, had left on human, the Holocaust survivor slowly directed leaders of the “free country” to a palpable self-conclusion of how to adjust their behavior so that looking away is not an option. Not only the big picture remained at logos’ control, however, small points were firmly advocated as well. For instance, when Weisel claimed that “indifference” was “more dangerous than anger and hatred”, appropriate reasons were given as to why he made such an assertion, which hence reduced critical audience’s

Open Document