Rhetorical Analysis Of The American Renown Orator

537 Words2 Pages

The American renown orator, Patrick Henry, uses emotions to evoke hope and strength into the helpless colonists. Henry makes the colonists think of why should they not be independent. Why should people kneel and hope to have freedom instead of going and taking it. To be able to inspire the American colonies to unite and fight for their freedom takes question leading questions and the audacity to stir the pot just enough to play on how the colonists acting cowardly can result in them not having the God given right to liberty. The point Henry is trying to convey to the colonists is it is worse for men to sit back and hope for hope instead of standing up for what they believe in. With God on their side, Henry understands they are “invincible by any force” that can be sent. The one direction Henry follows is guided by experience. Throughout the history of the tension between the colonists and the British ministry, they have rebelled in every way legal. He asks not to be deceived by the hope of Britain letting go of their tight hold on America. The goal for his …show more content…

The emotions evoke them to fight because of the questions he brings up. His biggest dilemma is how will he motivate his people. He knows the colonists want to be free and he hears men “cry peace, peace, but there is no peace”. With this being noted, he knows they want liberty but they're not motivated to fight and that is his job to inspire them. With Patrick Henry’s convincing speech, he encourages the colonists to fight the great power of Britain. All the dedication Henry put into this speech is worth the while. He believes if no one will motivate the people it is his responsibility. After all the thoughts and decisions to stand up or back down, the colonists decide to fight and eventually take down the world leading power. If it was not for Patrick Henry, there might not have been a United States of

Open Document