Rhetorical Analysis Of Marx Letter To Casablanca

649 Words2 Pages

Marx, King of Rhetoric Appeals Groucho Marx begins his letter to the Warner Brothers with hits and jabs on their illogical point of view on their use of the word “Casablanca” in their new movie title. Both the Warner and Marx brothers address the issue with two separate tones that clearly support their arguments. As the two go back and forth, the letter written by a Marx brother reveal not only a clear picture of their point of view but as well as an extremely persuasive one through his use of rhetorical appeals. With a comical tone, Marx uses his humor and wittiness to shame the Warner Bros. In his letter he starts off saying, “I had no idea that the city of Casablanca belonged to Warner Brothers.” Here he uses tone to create humor which shows that he is …show more content…

He says, “Now Jack, how about you?.... I can think of two other Jacks-- there was Jack of “Jack and the beanstalk” and Jack the Ripper”. Marx addresses the Warner Brothers on a first name basis to show that he is directly talking to them and to also show that they can calm the word “Casablanca” like property because even their first names are names that others have used as a title before them. Marx then targets another brother, “As for you Harry, you probably sign your checks sure in the belief that you are the first Harry of all time and that all other Harrys are impostors. Offhand i can think of two Harrys that preceded you.. Lighthorse Harry of Revolutionary fame and a Harry Appelbaum”. This only emphasizes Marx's point, by using a repetition of many others who have come before them and had their names first. It gives the audience a clear picture of this situation from the Marx brothers point of view. The audience then sees the hypocrisy though the reappearance of their names being used by others, tying it back to supporting their claim on the Warner Brothers having a ridiculous and irrational

Open Document