Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Challenges of restorative justice
Challenges of restorative justice
Restorative Justice In Criminal Justice
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Thousand-Year-Old Approach to Justice Curbs Violence Restorative Justice is not a new concept. It requires the offender to accept responsibility, make amends, and provide restitution to the victim. The offender, victim, and community work at problem solving and healing relationships. Our criminal justice system has been re-invented, but it is still failing to reduce crime and recidivism or otherwise known as repeat offenders. Taking responsibility for our actions is scary at times; no one wants to admit they have made a mistake. In our personal lives, it is not as hard to admit we have made a mistake, because we do not have a third party who will hear the offense from others not directly involved. Schools, prisons, juvenile justice systems, …show more content…
Prison is not always the answer. When returning to society with a felony record, it follows them for the rest of their life. Rehabilitation of education and job skills will not get them hired with a felony record. They will face obstacles in finding housing. Underlining addiction or mental health issues go untreated. Our recidivism rate is a disgrace compared to other countries. Prisons are seeing a large drop in recidivism rates that are practicing this approach before releasing criminals back into society. Using restorative justice in our criminal justice system will allow other options than prison. It comes to mind of a person who was under the influence, otherwise would have never made a poor choice, caused an accident and the passenger was killed. The focus would remain on the true victim, his wife and four …show more content…
We will see offenders with addiction or mental health issues get treatment, thus lowering recidivism. I have a relative that was been missing since January of this year, his daughter was born during this time. Our justice system is in the process of bringing charges against his friend for homicide. We could get our questions answered, based on our families faith he would get forgiveness, His daughter could get restitution that she deserves. Some of the harm to the remaining victims could be undone. Canada is using restorative justice in their criminal cases. In turn their recidivism rates are dropping. However, this would be a voluntary process with both the offender and victim. True evil will surface and that will prevent an offender or victim from volunteering. Those with high-income jobs will be lost. Health care facilities will need more
A growing number of probation officers, judges, prosecutors as well as other juvenile professionals are advocating for a juvenile justice system which is greatly based on restorative justice. These groups of people have been frustrated by the policy uncertainty between retribution and treatment as well as unrealistic and unclear public expectations. As a primary mission, the balanced approach or policy allows juvenile justice systems together with its agencies to improve in their capacity of protecting the community and ensuring accountability of the system and the offenders . It enables the youths to become productive and competent citizens. This guiding philosophical framework for this policy is restorative justice as it promotes the maximum involvement of the community, victim, and the offender in the justice process. Restorative justice also presents a viable alternative to sanctions as well as interventions that are based on traditional or retributive treatment assumptions. In the policy proposal for restorative justice, the balanced approach mission assists juvenile justice system in becoming more responsive to the needs of the community, victims, and the offenders . Therefore, this paper considers how restorative justice reduces referrals of juveniles to criminal and juvenile justice systems and gives a proposal on the implementation of restorative justice in the community together with a number of recommendations. For instance, preliminary research reveals that application of restorative justice in schools significantly reduces school expulsions, suspensions, and referrals to the criminal justice systems. Restorative justice programs are an alternative for zero-tolerance policies for juveniles or youths .
By helping unsteady criminals regain their health, society would see an exceptional reduction in the amount of crimes committed. Although some believe that incarceration is the most efficient solution to crime, nonviolent criminals should be treated through diversion programs in order to improve their mental health and the safety of society. Diversion programs have demonstrated rewarding results, while incarceration seems to temporarily punish the problem rather than fixing the deep-rooted issue. In the New York Times article, “Safety and Justice Complement Each Other,” by Glenn
Incarceration may be best for those who treatment has little hope. There are some who would be better treated by other means. Many crimes have underlying issues. Those issues include things like mental illness, substance abuse, and poverty. Issues like those mentioned will receive help from incarceration alone. Many people with substance abuse issues have underlying issues which would need to be treated if the offender is to break the cycle of addiction. If those issues are not addressed, the cycle will start again when the offender is released. In this case the offender would revolve in and out of the correction system until the underlying issue was addressed. However, once the underlying issues is addressed, whether in or out of the prison environment, the cycle is potentially
... the past several decades as a tough on crime approach has been adopted in the United States. According to Barkan and Bryjak, this approach has not served as a deterrent to crime. What has occurred are over-populated prisons and prisoners that are released back into society with little or no rehabilitation, causing a vicious cycle of re-offenders. The focus of the criminal justice system needs to shift from punishment to prevention. Prevention can be manifested in many programs: focusing on urban at-risk populations, targeting younger children to provide mentors to help them avoid falling into criminal behavior patterns, creation of jobs to help low-income families, and better rehabilitation programs for those that do end up in the prison system. Shift the billions of dollars spent on incarceration to a structure that will succeed: prevention.
There are better ways to punish criminals and protect society than mass incarceration. The state and local governments should be tough on crime, but “in ways that emphasize personal responsibility, promote rehabilitation and treatment, and allow for the provision of victim restitution where applicable” (Alec, 2014). The government also succeeds in overseeing punishment but fails to “…take into account the needs of offenders, victims, and their communities.” (Morris, 2002: Pg. 1 and 2). Alternatives to incarceration, such as sentencing circles, victim offender mediation, and family conferences, can successfully hold criminals responsible while allowing them a chance to get “back on their feet”. Research has proven that rehabilitation has lowered the rate of re-offenders, reducing the crime rate, protecting communities and also saves a lot of
Not only has there been debates about what approach should be used when punishing juvenile offenders, but there has also been debates about the need for two separate justice systems. Some individuals believe that juveniles need to be punished for their delinquency by being sentenced to jail just as an adult offender would be. According to Urban, Cyr, and Decker (2003), The Violent Crime Control Act of 1995 allows juveniles who are 13 years old and up to be sentenced as an adult if they have committed a violent crime with a fire arm on federal property. Advocates of such acts believe the juvenile justice system has failed at “rehabilitating” offenders by placing more focus on rehabilitation and treatment practices. Because of this these advocates
“Restorative justice is an approach to crime and other wrongdoings that focuses on repairing harm and encouraging responsibility and involvement of the parties impacted by the wrong.” This quote comes from a leading restorative justice scholar named Howard Zehr. The process of restorative justice necessitates a shift in responsibility for addressing crime. In a restorative justice process, the citizens who have been affected by a crime must take an active role in addressing that crime. Although law professionals may have secondary roles in facilitating the restorative justice process, it is the citizens who must take up the majority of the responsibility in healing the pains caused by crime. Restorative justice is a very broad subject and has many other topics inside of it. The main goal of the restorative justice system is to focus on the needs of the victims, the offenders, and the community, and focus
In today's society, we are facing many changes. Our own family, neighbors, and countrymen are afraid of many dangers which influence their lives. Although many people have fear which resonates in their consciousness and unconsciousness, the United States has a comparatively low crime rate. Despite this low crime rate, America incarcerates it's citizens five times the rate of Canada and seven times that of most European democracies.(Slambrouck, Paul. 24) Our society needs to be changed. We cannot blame the individuals involved in wrongdoing but we can blame our society who raised these criminals. Of course someone who kills another human being needs to be put away in some form; but we need to make changes. We need to help as many maladjusted people as we can. There are some steps which really seem to work. There are many prison inmates who come from broken homes and have low self-esteem. What needs to be done to help these insecure people, who are at war with themselves and society, is to rehabilitate them. The problem is the prison officials do not try to teach the prisoners how to learn from their mistakes.(McGovern, Celeste. 42) What actually happens is that criminals tend to be better thefts, and have the ability to out smart the police. Our politicians need to stress how important vocational, educational, drug-treatment, and religious programs are, in order to improve the attitude and demeanor of these convicted felons. This is the only way to keep ex-con's from jail.(DeLuca, H.R. 38) Another problem with America's prison system is overcrowding. There is a huge amount of young conscienceless offenders who are entering today's prisons. Imagine trying to compact eight gallons of water in a five gallon con...
The program is modeled after similar programs that begun in the 1970s and 1980s in New Zealand and Australia (Lawson 2004). It is used in schools, juvenile courts, and youth centers. However, for this discussion I will use the facts from Catherine Lawson’s restorative justice study in Missouri. In Lawson’s writings she references Derek R. Brookes, who came up with the conclusion that restorative justice attempts to produce these three outcomes: reconciliation, reparation, and transformation. Reconciliation is stage where all the apologies happen. Reparation is the stage at which the offender takes responsibility for his or actions, by providing fair restitution to the victim and lastly transformation is the stage where the offender is re-guided back into society as a productive member and is out of the cycle of
...hrough a long and complicated process of development. The goal of community service has not always been clear. However, due to increasing in the prison population, community-based corrections is now seen as a good alternative to incarceration due to its rehabilitative nature and cost savings. Communities also support non-incarceration measures for offenders who commit minor offenses. Community-based sanctions are more humane and even more effective in reducing the problem of recidivism. The biggest problem to reforming the system is the perception that offenders are inherently bad, and they cannot be reformed. Evidence from research suggests that rehabilitative programs aimed at restorative justice as opposed to retributive justice are good for all the parties. Importantly, it addresses the criminal tendencies that led to the commission of crime in the first place.
Most people have the common view that the criminal justice system’s increasing arrests and imprisonment is an effective strategy for reducing crime. If the judicial system makes greater distinction among violent and nonviolent crimes, the prisons will have the vacancies to incarcerate the Jeffery Dahmers of the world in prison for life. By providing alternatives to imprisonment for nonviolent offenders will reduce the burden of taxpayer’s dollars for added funding for construction of new prisons. I know as a College Student I would like to see increased State funding for education system rather than the millions allocated to the prison system of Pennsylvania.
In conclusion, “Is restorative justice effective?” The answer again, is multifaceted and complex. The implementation of restorative justice on a large-scale is not likely (Cullen & Jonson, 2017). Additionally, restorative justice does not address those offenders who are sent to prison. Lastly, the fact that it places faith in non-experts and community corrections impedes is effectiveness in reducing recidivism. Therefore, on the whole, evidence suggests that it is not effective. However, there is a silver lining. Restorative justice has illuminated the problem of a purely “punitive” system of corrections.
They still committed the crime and need to pay the time. If that were to happen the convicts who did not know what they were doing would be sent to prison and have to fend for themselves. There would be no way to help correct their biological obstacle that made them this way. If they are not treated as soon as they are released, they will just repeat the cycle because they were never taught what is right and what is wrong. When they do not know the difference between right or wrong it is like they need to be reprogrammed to understand what is right or wrong. Without professional help that only a certain place could provide and not a prison won’t we be repeating the cycle all over again instead of helping to solve the
All over America, crime is on the rise. Every day, every minute, and even every second someone will commit a crime. Now, I invite you to consider that a crime is taking place as you read this paper. "The fraction of the population in the State and Federal prison has increased in every single year for the last 34 years and the rate for imprisonment today is now five times higher than in 1972"(Russell, 2009). Considering that rate along crime is a serious act. These crimes range from robbery, rape, kidnapping, identity theft, abuse, trafficking, assault, and murder. Crime is a major social problem in the United States. While the correctional system was designed to protect society from offenders it also serves two specific functions. First it can serve as a tool for punishing the offender. This involves making the offender pay for his/her crime while serving time in a correctional facility. On the other hand it can serve as a place to rehabilitate the offender as preparation to be successful as they renter society. The U.S correctional system is a quite controversial subject that leads to questions such as how does our correctional system punish offenders? How does our correctional system rehabilitate offenders? Which method is more effective in reducing crime punishment or rehabilitation? Our correctional system has several ways to punish and rehabilitate offenders.
If you were to take a look at our prisons today, you would see that they are severely overcrowded. If there was a way that we could reduce the number of people that return to jail would you support this idea? Or would you say that it is a waste of time and money? One way of doing this would be start rehabilitating prisons so when they get out of jail, they can start contributing to society in a positive way. Currently there is more than 2.2 million people that are in prison in United States. Also the United States was one of the highest prison rates in the world. Most of the people that get arrested are brought to jail and are only there for a few years. What if we could do something about that and teach them as they come into the prison system and try to help them become a better person. If this happens, we may be able to break the cycle of repeat offenders that are coming back to jail once they get out. First people have to accept the idea that we have to put the time and effort into this in order to see a positive result. There are many different programs that are taking place in jails around the United States that are working well in reducing the number of inmates that come back to jail.