Responds To Krakauer Rhetorical Analysis

241 Words1 Page

In the article “Responds to Krakauer”, by Anatoli Boukreev he argues against the topic of Krakauer's accusations, Krakauer argues that Boukreev wasn’t well prepared to climb Mt. Everest. He mentions that boukreev wasn’t making his best decisions on May 10, 1996. Boukreev argues that his experience has been for over twenty years and that climbing in a high altitude. Boukreev explains how he’s been on top of Mt. Everest and most of his time up there he requires no oxygen. He mentions how it’s not as necessary to him when climbing. Krakauer not only only mentions the oxygen but he also mentions how he wasn’t well dressed for climbing the top of Everest. That if he would’ve been well prepared the tragedy wouldn’t of had happened. Boukreev also

Open Document