Religious Toleration In The Colonies

1121 Words3 Pages

Religious toleration in the British colonies was more limits than it was expansion. When there was "religious toleration", it had to go based on some rules that were put by the main church or by the royal Supremacy. Elizabeth the first is an adequate example of this. The Quakers were also limited by the church of England. Puritans along with the Quakers were pushed out of the colony and very badly tortured if they were caught going against the word of the Book of Prayer. Every time that a colony was able to practice their own religion, they would have to go by the rules and guidelines set by those with higher authority and power. Massachusetts and Pennsylvania were two colonies that were known to be religiously free. They were thought to be havens for fleeing religious parties from England. Elizabeth the first took over after Edward the 6th. Elizabeth reasserted her fathers separation from Rome and her half brothers (Edward) demand for conformity. Many common people of the colony thought that she wouldn't be able to achieve what she was striving for. By doing what her dad …show more content…

This was a red flag towards England and its church. Puritans believed that God already had already planned if you were destined to go to heaven or hell by the time you were born. They thought that if they just lived a normal "moral life", that would be suitable and nothing one did would change Gods decision on where they were destine to go. They also challenged the that the England church would sell purgatory slips. With the purchase of these slips, or passes, one could buy their way into heaven and or clear themselves or another person of the sins they had committed during their lifetime. Puritans did not agree with the false se statement tat the church was making to the people about being able to clear their sins and get into heaven. They believed that if a person was chosen to go to heaven, then it would show in their character and in their way of

Open Document