Reagan's Defense Budget

658 Words2 Pages

To protect US producers and workers, Reagan increased import barriers by practically doubling the items subject to trade restrictions. However, Reagan did not have much success in reducing government spending. Since defense was a top priority for the president, he ended up spending an enormous amount for defense. To accomplish the goal of reducing the threat of Communism and winning the Cold War, he ultimately increased the defense budget by 35%.

But, Reagan also expanded Medicare, and improved the possible longevity of Social Security by increasing the related payroll tax. Reagan ended up averaging more than 2% annually in increased government spending and doubling the national debt. Part of that responsibility, however, belongs to the Congress …show more content…

Volcker raised the Fed funds rate gradually to 20%, which broke the back of the double-digit inflation, but it also intensified the 1981 recession. Unemployment rose to more than 10%, while business spending fell. The Carter-Reagan recession lasted from July 1981 to November 1982.

While Reagan’s tax cuts helped to end the recession, Volcker’s monetary policy brought inflation down to less than 2% by 1986. The economy grew rapidly and pushed inflation back up to approximately 4% by 1988, but this was still far less than the 13+% in Carter’s time frame. Reagan moved, also, to make tax brackets indexed for inflation. While the tax cuts were partially offset by the increase in the Social Security payroll tax, excise taxes being raised, and numerous deductions being eliminated — the tax cuts were economically affective in stimulating consumer demand.

Prior to Reagan taking office, the misery index (inflation rate added to the unemployment rate) stood at more than 19%. The misery index was down to less than 10% by the time President Reagan left office. Both the inflation rate and the unemployment rate had declined while personal income had …show more content…

This turned out to be another major economic mistake.

Essentially, Congress was attempting to “punish” US oil companies for making money. With increased world production driving down the price of oil, the actual US tax revenue was considerably less than expected. The actual US tax revenue acquired was less than one-fourth of the original amount estimated by the Treasury Department.

Much of the tax revenue obtained by the US government represented profits badly needed by the US oil industry. These profits were needed to develop and install new technology. In the global race to enhance oil production, implementing improved technology was crucial. This tax burden greatly handicapped the US oil industry. For several years, the US oil industry was deprived of the revenue necessary to generate new technological advancements. In general, the tax applied mainly to US oil companies and not international companies. As a result, the tax burden basically hindered US’s domestic production and was

Open Document