Raynor Manalad Case

457 Words1 Page

have chosen the case of Hugh Bacalla Garth, as it is a relevant example of how the change of a law is being applied, the consequences and some implications on people's life. The topic is the new punch legislation and the case of Hugh Bacalla Garth allegedly hit 21-year-old Raynor Manalad at a birthday party at Minchinbur, they 7th of May 2014. Raynor Manalad hit his head on the footpath and was quickly sent to Westmead Hospital but unfortunately died the next day. Mr Manalad allegedly ¬intervened in an argument between Garth and his girlfriend when he was hit about 1am. Before Hugh Garth punched Raynor Manalad he also harmed a women at the party. This contributes to have a longer sentence, which yet has not been decided. This case is relevant because it is the first case applying the new "one punch legislation", after NSW Attorney-General Greg Smith decided to change the law an ensure that offence and charge will be considerable higher if the assault, causes death. The revised law has included as well …show more content…

Both young 18-year-old teenagers were killed by a fatal punch in King Cross in 2012. Both perpetrators suffered a minimum of 6 years. The content and impact of the new law The new laws include the following areas: New sentences for ‘one punch’ assaults A 20 year maximum sentence for anyone who unlawfully assaults another who dies as a direct or indirect result of the assault. If the offender was intoxicated by alcohol or drugs, a minimum of eight years and a maximum 25 year sentence applies. Existing maximum sentences increased by two years For serious assaults where drugs and alcohol are involved, existing maximum sentences will increase by two years, and mandatory minimum sentences have been introduced. Voluntary intoxication removed as a mitigating factor in sentencing Voluntary intoxication by drugs or alcohol will be removed as a mitigating factor when courts determine

Open Document