Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Summary of behaviorism
Summary of behaviorism
Summary of behaviorism
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Summary of behaviorism
Little Albert Experiment
Who were the experimenters?
The experimenters were John B. Watson and his student and wife Rosalie Rayner. John B Warner first studied at Furman University then with the help of his professor, Gordon Moore, moved to the University of Chicago. He started developing interest in the field of comparative psychology and studying animals. In 1903 he received his doctorate and later became an associate professor of psychology at Johns Hopkins University. In 1913 he came up with the idea of “behaviorism”. Behaviorism explains the ability to predict and control people’s actions (Watson, 1999). Rosalie Rayner graduated from Vassar College in 1919 and enrolled at Johns Hopkins University for graduate studies. At Johns Hopkins she became an assistant to John B. Watson and embarked on the now infamous “little Albert” experiments which resulted with an affair between Watson and Rayner. As a result of this Watson was forced to leave the University, Rayner also left, without completing her degree. They then moved to Connecticut and had two children who they raised using the behaviorist principles (Smirle, 2013).
What was the hypothesis?
The hypothesis was that little Albert could be taught to fear certain things, he would acquire a fear response to a white rat through classical conditioning after the white rat had been paired with a loud noise.
Who were the participants?
The participant was a little boy who they decided to name “little Albert”, or “Albert B”. However recent discoveries have said to find the real identity of the boy, who according to them was named Douglas Merritte. There was a preconditioning period, almost from birth up to the age of nine months when the real tests began. The last recorded observatio...
... middle of paper ...
...ert meaning it could be biased. There is also no informed consent on any data base. The study caused severe distress in the child. It is also known that the child known to be little Albert, Douglas Merritt, was diagnosed with hydrocephalus and it is thought that Watson knew about this. Regardless of whether or not Warner knew about it, Albert’s temperament and behavior were not within the normal range for his age. Retardation, and autism spectrum disorder might have been the reason why Albert responded in such ways during the experiment. However there is a different theory that his disorder was caused after the study due to the frigid temperatures and bright lights, however this is very unlikely (Fridlund, Hall, Williams, 2011)
What were the contributions to the science of psychology?
Classical conditioning was proven to work and behaviorism was a proven theory now.
The effects of this experience, although unethical in its approach to conduct experiment without knowledge to the parents it does not rise to the level of harm. It can, however, be argued that it has had an effect on them emotionally and perhaps they may experience further complications, but far greater atrocities have occurred in the name of science and in this particular case, no credible data ever developed from this experiment due to it being
This created an atmosphere where the teacher thought he was really inflicting pain on another individual, which was highly stressful for the volunteers. I definitely think that our current generation of 20 and 50 year old males are more inclined to question authority than the group from 1962. Ethics This experiment is relevant to an ethics course because putting individuals in this type of experiment is traumatic and can cause a high level of stress and unnecessary pain for the volunteer. The volunteers were deceived by the study, believing that they were actually harming another person, and there was potential to cause psychological harm, which is unethical (McLeod, 2007).
1. The Milgram Shock Experiment was made after the Holocaust. Milgram, the man who invented this experiment, wanted to see if the participant in this test would obey an authority figure. Much as the Nazis did in the holocaust, and listened to every order Hitler demanded, even after many Nazis knew it was morally wrong.
Watson did not debrief either Albert or his parents about the nature of the study. The study’s purpose was to induce an emotional response of fear into this young child. Watson both physically and mentally harmed the child, possibly leaving Albert emotionally traumatized by the experiment. To add,
He took an environmental approach to the study. His method was the use of the operant conditioning box also known as Skinner box helped understand different behaviors that occurred during different environments. He stimulated a system of rewards and punishments and reinforcements. When the pigeon or rat received a reward, the animal performed the behavior more often and when it received a punishment, it performed the behavior less. He first tested positive reinforcement which he made rats press a lever for food. It encouraged the rat to perform more of the behavior. He also used negative reinforcement which added an uncomfortable stimulus. He placed an electric current in the box. The rats learn to avoid it. They even learned to stop when he turned on the light indicating the circuit will soon turn on. This behavior was known as Avoidance or Escape Learning. Both positive and negative reinforcements encourage good behavior. He also used punishment. Unlike the reinforcements, punishments were used to discourage unwanted behaviors rather than promote good behavior. It was performed by adding an unfavorable stimuli or removing the rewarding stimuli. When the rat was punished, its unwanted behavior decreased. When Skinner, removed the punishment, the bad behavior returned. He placed a hungry rat. The rat would pull the lever for food, but no food would come out. The rat later stopped pulling it learning it had no purpose. He studied that the more the rat pulled the lever, the higher the probability that the rat will quit pulling it; he developed an equation known as response and extinction rate. Response rate, the domain, is that rate of how hard a person performed an action and extinction rate, the range, is the rate that the person performed the action less and less. As the response rate increase, so this extinction rate. He used a token economy, a type of positive reinforcement, which a person was given a “token” which can be
In observational learning, a child takes note of what his or her mother or father considers to be threatening. On the other hand, children can also be conditioned by their own life experiences through a process called operant conditioning (SOURCE). In some instances, children tend to generalize their fears, subsequently forming a phobia. For example, a young girl who became increasingly cautious of flying insects after an unpleasant encounter with a nest of agitated yellow jackets. After being assaulted by these creatures, she associated all flying bugs with the painful sting of a yellow jacket. Of course, children can also be classically conditioned to display a fearful response; that is, they learn to associate an unconditioned fear-relevant stimulus with a conditioned stimulus, provoking a conditioned, fearful response. One of the most well-known examples of this is an experiment involving a young boy, famously dubbed Little Albert. Little Albert learned to fear small furry animals in a laboratory setting when the presence of these creatures was paired with loud banging noises (SOURCE). From the aforementioned experiments and studies, it is undeniable that external circumstances and experiences assist in the configuration of fear in
One of the most famous example of fear conditioning is the Little Albert experiment conducted by Watson and Rayner in 1920. In this experiment, an infant, Albert, was presented with a white rat, and as expected, Albert initially displayed no signs of fear and began touching and playing with the rat. Soon, the experimenters began pairing the presentation of the rat with a loud noise (US) produced by banging a hammer on a steel bar. The noise caused Albert to startle and cry (UR). After several pairing, Albert learned to fear the rat (CS) and would crawl away or cry (CR) when the rat was subsequently presented (Watson and Rayner, 1920)
John B.Watson, R Rayner, (February, 1920), Journal of Experimental Psychology, Conditioned Emotional Reactions, Vol. lll, No. i.
Classical conditioning refers to a type of learning in which a previously neutral stimuli took on the ability to stimulate a conditioned response in an individual (Gormezano & Moore, 1966). To prove that environment was more impactful than genetics, Watson conducted an experiment on an infant, little Albert. Initially, Albert showed little fear towards rats. When Watson repeatedly exposed Albert to the rat accompanied by a loud noise, the latter began to develop fear towards not just the rat but also other furry animals. Watson successfully showed that the acquisition of a phobia can be explained by classical conditioning (Watson & Watson, 1921). Regardless of their genes, the associations of the right stimuli can result in the development of a new behaviour in any individual.
...experiment, felt that the experiment made such a deep impression on him that he became convinced that “social sciences and psychology, are much more important in today’s world.'; One can only imagine the inner conflicts that were running through his head. After the experiment, he described the mood, “I did want to stop at that time. I turned around and looked at [the experimenter]. I guess it’s a matter of…authority.';
John Broadus Watson (1878-1958) has become well known for being the founder of behaviorism as a school of thought throughout American psychology. His view on psychology consisted of seeing it as a science of observation on behaviors. He believed that one must first observe a behavior in a certain environment or situation, then predict and determine the connection between the two. Much of his theory was based on the work of Ivan Pavlov’s observations through classical conditioning. Watson claimed that the process of classical conditioning could be used to explain any behavioral factor in human psychology. Classical conditioning involves the pairing of two different stimuli in producing a learning response from the participant. His belief on the topic was that single differences in behavior were caused by different experiences of learning.
In chapter one, we discussed about John B. Watson’s theory that all behaviors were to be learned like what he did towards “little Albert” and the white mouse. There are several connections that I can make from my own experience of how John B. Watson conditioned “little Albert” mind. This can relate to myself but in case it is about seeing the dark. Ever since I was a kid my parents would always tell me that to not walk away from them especially at night. They would always scare me and say “there’s a monster there!!” or there’s a ghost and as a kid I
The Little Albert experiment has become a widely known case study that is continuously discussed by a large number of psychology professionals. In 1920, behaviorist John Watson and his assistant Rosalie Rayner began to conduct one of the first experiments done with a child. Stability played a major factor in choosing Albert for this case study, as Watson wanted to ensure that they would do as little harm as possible during the experiment. Watson’s method of choice for this experiment was to use principles of classic conditioning to create a stimulus in children that would result in fear. Since Watson wanted to condition Albert, a variety of objects were used that would otherwise not scare him. These objects included a white rat, blocks, a rabbit, a dog, a fur coat, wool, and a Santa Claus mask. Albert’s conditioning began with a series of emotional tests that became part of a routine in which Watson and Rayner were determining whether other stimuli’s could cause fear.
After a number of repeated this procedures, Pavlov tried to ring his bell by its own... ... middle of paper ... ... classical conditioning, and conditioned emotional responses, 2014. http://www.sonoma.edu/users/d/daniels/pavlov.html 8. Strengths and weakness, 2014.
Jhon B Watson, a behaviorist, conducted an experiment inspired by the Russian psychologist Ivan Pavlov to determinate the classical condition in humans. Little Albert experiment was conducted in a 9 month old baby whom a rat is showed to see his r...