Rattlesnakes have long been an iconic part of Texas history. A quote that really hit home
for me was, “Texas belongs to all of us, and it’s our job to protect it” (The Dallas Morning News,
2016). Creating policies against “gassing” of rattlesnakes could create a more humane
prospective of the rattlesnake roundups, however it could have a negative impact on the
communities’ economy (Shlachter, 2014). The economy in Sweetwater, TX depends on the
roundup income every year (Shlachter, 2014). The conflicts, opponents, and proponents for
proposed policy changes regarding the “gassing” of rattlesnakes for these roundups are
controversial, but agencies responsible for our wildlife resources need to keep in mind the
preservation of the rattlesnake
…show more content…
The impact could be either positive or
negative. The “gassing” process possesses a negative impact on the contamination of
groundwater (Center of Biological Diversity, 2016). The banning of “gassing” creates positive
externalities. There are 130 karst invertebrates that occupy the same habitat with the rattlesnakes,
26 of the listed species are federally threatened or endangered (Davis, 2016). Banning of
“gassing” would also allow the species to thrive.
Public Goods
Public goods are goods that anyone can benefit from, individuals cannot be excluded
from it and can’t take it away (Weimer & Vining, 2011). The public good associated with
rattlesnake roundups is the educational factor. Roundups do teach the community/spectators the
dangers of rattlesnakes, but they do not necessarily educate them on the effects of “gassing” on
other species and environment (Mushinsky, Savitzky, Brodie, Brown, Campbell, Enge,
Fitzgerald, Greene, Gregory, Jensen, Painter, Price, & Timmerman, n.d.).
Common-pool Goods
Common-pool goods are resources that are natural or constructed and are hard
…show more content…
The rattlesnake hunters may capture as many
snakes as they want and the only regulation is they must acquire a hunting license to capture the
snakes (Fitzgerald & Painter, 2000).
Distributive Justice
The conflict with “gassing” environmentally is the effects on habitats of non-targeted
wildlife, contamination of groundwater, human-health risks if the meat is eaten, and the
inhumane treatment of the snakes after they are captured (Center for Biological Diversity, 2016).
The roundup communities argue that if Texas Parks and Wildlife Department create a ban policy
on the “gassing” of rattlesnakes, it will definitely impact the events negatively. Opponents of the
ban also argue that the population of snakes will go up and pose a threat to people being bit
(Shlachter, 2014).
Actor’s Views
The environmentalists, Texas Parks and Wildlife, and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service are
proponents to manage and create a healthy, wildlife habitat for all animals and prevent harm to
them and the environment’s resources in the process of rattlesnake extraction (Snake Harvest
Working Group Final Report, 2016). Hunters view the ban of “gassing” a threat to
Did you know that thousands of burmese pythons are thriving in the florida everglades. Burmese pythons should NOT be kept as pets. One, The snakes are destroying the environment. Two, the burmese pythons is not the ideal pet. And Three, The python challenge is a stupid idea.
Burmese pythons (Python molurus) are popular pets in the United States because of their attractive color pattern, reputed docility, and the allure, for some, of owning a giant snake. According to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, approximately 99,000 Burmese pythons were imported to the United States between 1996 and 2006, compared to only 17,000 between 1970 and 1995. The species is classified by the World Conservation Union as “near threatened” in its native range in Southeast Asia due to exportation for the pet trade and hunting for skins. Thousands of pythons are also captive bred each year in the U.S. for sale as pets. An inexperienced snake keeper who takes home a 20-inch hatchling is, within a year, responsible for a brawny eight-foot predator.
And subsequently, new policies and laws are created to give people equal access to wildlife. The question regard conservation is very much alive today. And United State needs conservation of wildlife. And the Federal department responsible for conservation, department of the interior are under attack with President Trump new budget plan. So it’s important to keep pushing for better laws and policies to protect
“The Rattler” explores the conflicts between man and nature that seem inescapable. The narrator is taking a walk through the desert when he comes across a rattlesnake. After some thought, he decides to kill it and proceeds to violently slaughter it with a hoe. The snake fights back when provoked, but fails. The author makes the reader feel sympathy towards the snake and empathy towards the man through the personality of the snake, the point of view of the man, and the language and details regarding the setting.
The author¡¯s techniques in Rattler convey not only a feeling of sadness and remorse but also a sense of the man¡¯s acceptance of the snake¡¯s impending death. The reader can sense the purpose of the author¡¯s effective message through the usage of diction, imagery, and organization.
The invasive reptiles are eating almost everything in sight like raccoons, opossums, bobcats, alligators and many federally protected animals like the Key Largo wood rat and Wood stork. There have been cases of children and pets being eaten or even squeezed to death by the large snakes in their own yards.
The snake was not aware of the man’s intentions was cautious but not yet preparing for an attack. The rattlesnake “lay ridged” through its mistrust of the man did not feel threatened so his “body was undulant” not preparing for an attack. Because of its natural instincts the snake was wary of the man’s presence but did not feel provoked enough to set up a defense. The usual instincts would have been to give a strong attack but choose not to do so. Still attentive to the man’s possible actions, the snake presents him with a warning for both their sake. Therefore as the man raised his weapon the snake set up its rattling and “shook his fair but furious signal” warning the man he “made an unprovoked attack”. The snake had not planned on attacking the man so instead of reacting swiftly the snake had given the man a warning. By doing so the snake shows its value of life because he left the man chance in avoiding an outcome with death for either side. Consequently having misjudged the man’s intent it is left with little time to protect itself from an unexpected attack. With the man suddenly attacking the snake with a hoe it “struck passionately” until it “was soon dead”. As a result of not being able to assemble an attack the snake is left with it’s only chance of winning by striking hard but with ineffective moves. Thus readers feel sympathy for the snake because it had not called for an attack that would have taken either
...ress it causes for the animal not only the captivity, but also in the capture process. There are many health risks for the animal and it rips them away from their family. These animals are so amazing, but as you can see, it is better for them to stay in their environment with family and not be put on display.
When the three of us decided to use Texas as our micro-culture, I thought it was a great idea. I am not a Texan, since by definition to be a Texan, you must have been born in Texas, no exceptions (http://www.texas-best.com), but do consider myself an honorary Texan.
“The Rattler” is a story that is written by Donald Beattie that expresses a survival and protective tone to persuade readers to side with the man that killed the snake in order to protect a larger community of animals and humans. Beattie is presenting the story to a large group of people in attempt to persuade them. Beattie uses imagery, simile, and pathos to develop a root of persuasion and convince the audience to reanalyze the man’s actions.
The comparison of the rattlesnake to a bigger, more frightening, and yet less deadly creature makes the former seem dangerous. While a blacksnake would “flee at the sight of a man”, the rattler proved its fearlessness with the way he “held his ground”. The rattler is cocky, and for good reason, because his poison could kill the man much easier than the theoretical blacksnake could. The man is in a life-threatening situation and the reader is likely to sympathize with his fear and worry. The author uses violent diction when describing the snake to make us see him as a vicious creature, in need of killing to keep others safe. Even dead, the rattler “may still bite”. He needs to be kept as far as possible from people - especially vulnerable people, such as young children - in order to protect them. The author includes this hostile wording to bring awareness to the fact that the snake is remorseless, even in death, and that taking its life is noble and just. Finally, the snake’s “little song of death” is personified negatively by the man to show that the snake is the villain in the story. Life is, according to the rattlesnake, “dear and would be dearly sold”. It comes to light in this phrase that the snake is looking for revenge from the man’s actions. The rattler is not as innocent as he may have initially seemed. As he attempts at the man’s life to bring
"Texas Politics - Texas Political Culture." Welcome to Texas Politics. University of Texas at Austin, 2011. Web. 15 Mar. 2011. .
Estimates are that at the turn of the twentieth century, over two million wild horses roamed free in the western United States. However, having no protection from their primary predator, man, by the 1970’s their numbers had dwindled to less than thirty thousand. In 1971, after a massive public uproar, Congress by a unanimous vote enacted the “Wild Free-Roaming Horse and Burro Act” (Act) that characterizes wild horses and burros as national treasures and provides for their protection. “Congress finds and declares that wild free-roaming horses and burros are living symbols of the historic and pioneer spirit of the West; that they contribute to the diversity of life forms within the Nation and enrich the lives of the American people; and that these horses and burros are fast disappearing from the American scene. It is the policy of Congress that wild free-roaming horses and burros shall be protected from capture, branding, harassment, or death; and to accomplish this they are to be considered in the area where presently found, as an integral part of the natural system of the public lands.”
the government has spent millions on building electric fences in hopes of containing the fish so as
“Virtually 96 percent of their lives are spent in chains or cages,” and “11 months a year they travel over long distances in box cars with no climate control; sleeping, eating, and defecating in the same cage,” as stated by PAWS, Protective Animal Welfare Society, is one of the many organizations that strives to protect animals right and sheds light on this horrific situation that should be stopped at once. This is an insight of what the animals have to endure just for our entertainment. PAWS also discuses when these animals are eventually allowed out of their cages they undergo “extreme ‘discipline’ such as whipping, hitting, poking, and shocking with electrical prods,” for training purposes to ensure that the performance goes without any complications. The transportation of theses animals is cruel and unusual no matter how it is looked at.