Raskolnikov's Nihilism

1766 Words4 Pages

Raskolnikov’s theory of the superior man states that:
All men are divided into ‘ordinary’ and ‘extraordinary’. Ordinary men have to live in submission, have no right to transgress the law, because … they are ordinary. But extraordinary men have a right to commit any crime and to transgress the law in any way just because they are extraordinary … An extraordinary man has the right … an inner right to decide in his own conscience to overstep … certain obstacles … only in the case it is essential for the practical fulfilment of his idea … sometimes to benefit to the whole of humanity (205 - 206).
This ideology is represented in many historic figures such as Napoleon, Newton, Mahomet, Solon and other legislators and leaders of men. In his desire to become an extraordinary man, Rodion Romanovich Raskolnikov attempts to pursue this ideology. Yet, throughout Fyodor Dostoyevsky's Crime and Punishment, Raskolnikov contradicts his selfset nihilistic …show more content…

Nonetheless, she is still subject to the effects of his indecisiveness. Her meek and redemptive demeanor makes her the perfect victim. For instance, Sonya does little to actively change Raskolnikov’s ways when she becomes aware of his crimes. Instead, she is drawn into his atrocities. She says to him, “‘what have you done — what have you done to yourself?’” and that “‘there is no one — no one in the whole world now so unhappy as you!’” (323). Despite her close relationship to one of Raskolnikov’s murder victims, she finds it within herself to share the pain together, “to suffer together, and … bear [their crosses together]” (332) even though Sonya already suffers because of her extreme poverty and her occupation as a prostitute. In consequence, Raskolnikov’s actions affect not only himself but also the one whom he depends on the most. Indeed, his dependence on Sonya isolates himself from the rest of society also results in both of their

Open Document