Quintilian's Humor

912 Words2 Pages

Why do we laugh? The question has perplexed philosophers for centuries—prompting countless essays, discourses, and speeches. Quintilian, a first century Roman rhetoric instructor, theorized in his Institutio Oratorio that humor is “independent of art [and] depends on nature and opportunity,” which explains the witty and subtleties of humor in Shakespeare’s Twelfth Night (358). Humor in Shakespeare’s Twelfth Night, in accordance with Quintilian's philosophy, results from a delicate balance of personality, or nature, and circumstance but not craft, or a change in personality. The cause of the humor can be attributed to nature and circumstance because in most cases the character does not change their personality; if the character in question does …show more content…

Oliva witness Viola, who she perceives to be her husband, Sebastian, declare her love for Duke Orsino, another man. Olivia thinking that her husband “detests” her, “[calls] forth the holy father,” to verify their marriage (5.1.128, 131). The humor in this altercation stems from the incongruity theory. Olivia does not expect Viola (or Cesario) to act the way she does and her subsequent “freak-out” causes the audience to laugh. Olivia does not change her personality at all in this scene, nor does she use change the way she talks. Earlier in the play, when Olivia sees Malvolio acting strange, she responds in a similar way; in act three, Olivia responds to Malvolio’s behavior by saying “this is very midsummer madness,” and subsequently allowing Maria “look to Malvolio.” (3.4.48-49) Olivia in Act three shows that she is confused easily and reacts aggressively to the confusion. Olivia acts the same way in act five—she both questions the person and pulls an outside source to investigate. Due to the similarities between Olivia’s response to Malvolio and Olivia’s response to Viola, Olivia did not change her personality to make the scene funny for the audience, and thus, her natural temperament made the scene funny. Olivia, however, would not have reacted this way had the situation been different; thus, the humor stems from …show more content…

Andrew’s humor centres around the superiority which attributes humor to the mocking of the “lower class,” or in this case those of lower intelligence. Andrew is portrayed as simple, stupid drunkards who is unaware of his blatant manipulations. For example, in act one, Andrew is identified as “a foolish knight,” whose only purpose to Toby is “[his] three thousand ducats a year.” Andrew does not further his intelligence when “INSERT SOME EXAMPLE.” This blatant manipulation of Andrew both confirms that Andrew is not intelligent, but also serves as an example of superiority humor. Because Andrew lacks intellect, the fellow characters poke fun of him which prompts the audience to laugh at his expense (in German, schadenfreude). For example, in act four scenes one and two, when Toby convinces Andrew to challenge Cesario to a duel in an effort to improve his relations with Oliva. Toby understands that Andrew will probably not act—Toby says “I dare lay any money ‘twill be nothing yet”—but the spectacle of Andrew fighting coupled with the prospect of losing his source of money, Andrew, push Toby to convince Andrew (3.4.334) This is an example of superiority humor because Andrew is unaware that he is being manipulated, and is certain that Toby has his best interests at heart. Thus, Andrew’s lack of intelligence, a key part of his personality and role in the play,

Open Document