Psychodynamic Approach Trauma

1191 Words3 Pages

Freud Freud’s approach trauma is based in the treatment of hysteria. According to Ringel and Brandell, Freud and Breuer, considered an “external event” as responsible of determining hysterical symptoms. The common component between hysteria and trauma is the outcome of fright. Freud and Breuer emphasis the importance of cathartic experience as a way of decreasing or vanishing the effect. The “cathartic method” that was developed by Breuer, assisted to release of inhibited emotions. Freud believed that the libido, necessary to be relished for the symptoms to be improved (p. 43). In Freud’s view, the difference between traumatic loss and the mourning is that a loss will not be a permanent trauma, but be considered as normal bereavement. Individuals effected by trauma, experience major mood of pain and display loss of interest in their surrounding (p. 46). Separating between normal bereavement and permanent trauma is a great observation and appropriate when treating …show more content…

Ringel and Brandell state that, according to Fairbairn the biggest drive of people is not pleasure or tension release in relationships, but seeking connections with others is the purpose of libido (p. 53). Fairbairn claimed that the traumatic event in infancy could lead individuals to feel unloved and the love for their parents has negative value, or not value at all (p. 54). Fairbairn theory claimed that children defense mechanism demonstrated by ego splitting (p. 54). After early ego splitting, another one happened. First split between “the good parents” which function as exciting objects, and the disappointing ones that called the rejecting objects. According to Fairbairn this is part of the self, connected to exciting objects that the individual feels longing to, and the anti-libidinal ego, which is connected to the rejecting object that provoke negative emotions (p.

More about Psychodynamic Approach Trauma

Open Document