Provoking Fear in both the Victorian and Modern Reader of The Signalman

2252 Words5 Pages

How Does Charles Dickens Use The Ghost Story Genre To Provoke Fear In Both The Victorian And Modern Reader Of The Signalman? “Charles Dickens” is the author of "The Signalman"; this story is a pre 20th Century piece and is a horror story. People today may not find the story very frightening but when it was written, the Victorians would have taken to this horror much more understandably, due to the fact that technology like the train was all new and it changed the lifestyle of people. The train itself is quite a frightening figure; it is large, shoots out steam and makes quite a spine-chilling loud noise. Also, the train would have been the fastest means of transport at that time and it seemed very uncontrollable and dangerous to the Victorians. "The Signalman" is not a typical ghost story because it is set in the day. The railway is not exactly a typical ghost story setting either, which evokes the fear that it could happen to anyone. The first paragraph grabs the reader’s attention by using dialogue the Narrator is shouting "Helloa! Below there!" The reader is dragged into the middle of what seems an interesting story. The Narrator is calling to a man standing at the door to his box, holding a flag in his hand rolled up against its short pole. Even though the reader has started in the middle of a story, the Narrator has not given much information away at all; we can only guess that the man being called to is the Signalman and we know nothing about the Narrator. When the signalman hears the voice, he could not have doubted the direction the voice came from, but instead of looking at the Narrator on top of the steep cutting nearly over his head, he looked down the line. This creates an atmosphere of su... ... middle of paper ... ...alman was being warned to save himself! The other railway workers were saddened to lose such a good signalman. The engine 'cut' him down. Cut is a very powerful word and very intense. Tom called out and made the same actions as the spectre, the signalman and the Narrator. This is ironic and makes it clear that the three are linked. Both Victorian and modern readers would be overwhelmed by the outcome of the situation and would be scared (especially Victorians) by the fact it was daytime, making it believable that it could happen to anyone. On the whole, I think this story is first-class because of the way it is written. We learn things as the Narrator learns them (first hand). The reader may think that the story is all explained, but somewhere, in the back of their minds, they will be asking, "Why did the signalman not move out of the way of the train?"

Open Document