Pros And Cons Of Utilitarianism

1597 Words4 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Pros and cons of utilitarianism

A student needs an A in Introduction to Ethics in order to gain admission into law school. In order to assure this, he decides to offer his professor $500 in order to raise his grade from a C to an A, allowing him to be admitted According to utilitarian Stuart Mill, the idea of higher-level pleasures are those that give more long-term pleasure, while requiring a significant amount of pain in order to affirm the true value of the pleasure. These, in turn, are most likely to give us long term happiness. Since humans are more complex beings, part of what separates them from an animalistic existence is having these higher-level pleasures because it takes more to make us truly happy.

The student desires the acceptance to law school and aspires …show more content…

Utilitarians believe that actions that are good are those that maximize pleasure and minimize pain, en route to achieving true happiness by having that distinct action serve as a means to achieving true happiness. Additionally, just because someone would describe an action or an idea as “good” does not mean that it morally good or correct. To add morality in the equation, one must consider both the pleasure principle and the consideration of higher-level qualities together. Since the student’s act of cheating would only consider the pleasure principle and disregard the sense of higher-level goods, utilitarianism would argue that his cheating is not morally …show more content…

Part of being the complexity of human nature and, therefore, the complexity of the needs of humans in order to attain happiness, is that some pain or sacrifice is involved to attain true happiness. It would not be proper to say that the action of both the student and the teacher were wrong because cheating is wrong, but rather their actions are morally wrong because they are denying their humanity. Living in a world with simple solutions to complex situations drifts both the teacher and the student into an animalistic existence of sorts, and prevents the student from ever being able to achieve true

Show More
Related

  • Ethics of Suicide: A Comparative Analysis

    901 Words  | 2 Pages

    One constant between all cultures is the understanding that all lives will come to an end. Throughout one’s lifetime, virtue, character, and morality are sought, through different ideals and methods, with the overall endgame being the most ethical and desirable outcome possible. There are times, however, when an individual may feel like there is no hope of reaching a successful existence; therefore the act of suicide becomes a viable option. The decision to voluntarily take one’s life has always been a topic of discussion on ethical grounds. Whether or not the decision to die is an ethical one can be argued depending on from which ethical theory the act is being evaluated.

    Read More

  • John Stuart Mill: Exploring 19th Century Utilitarianism

    1388 Words  | 3 Pages

    The second classic criticism of Utilitarian Principle is that Mill’s dichotomy of higher and lower pleasures create the need to calculate the happiness derived from each category of pleasures. This has left critics asking “Is a dissatisfied Socrates better off than a satisfied fool?” In response, Mill says that people learn to distinguish physical (or lower) pleasures from mental (or higher) pleasures with training. We possess the tendency to favor the higher pleasures, as we are human beings rather than mere

    Read More

  • Critical Analysis Of Christian Miller's Essay On Cheating

    806 Words  | 2 Pages

    The thing that confuses me are the reasons why people cheat. I know that in college life, it is clear that grades are important. Since grades are so important, people want to do better and want to succeed in their classes that they are taking. By cheating, it makes it easier for them to get a better grade. I agree that it is not an honest thing to do, but it is clear that they are doing it for a reason, to benefit themselves. Also, people want to help their friends succeed so that is another part of it. I think if schools wanted to get rid of cheating, they should not focus on the grades as much. Grading people is important, but is it that important if everyone cheats? I also see how people want to be viewed as honest. I do not think people want to cheat because they think they will be viewed as immoral. Also, they could be punished which would hurt them as well. If everyone cheats in schools, why not just allow it? That is the way that the world is running currently and everyone is cheating their way through

    Read More

  • Ethical Issues Of Utilitarianism

    327 Words  | 1 Pages

    Utilitarianism is an ethical study often associated with “politics of interest” because the ideas of utilitarianism are set on maximizing utility and efficiency. This idea focuses on individualism and aggregating what is best for society as a whole, specifically the economic aspect of society. Deontology is an ethical study that is almost the complete opposite of utilitarian beliefs. Deontology is an ethical study often associated with “politics of conscious” because it approaches issues with the idea of right vs. wrong on mind. This ethical viewpoint is rooted in fulfilling God’s laws and focuses on equal rights. An ethical dilemma case that revolves around the utilitarianism view is The Yellowstone National Park case. The controversy in

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of Act-Utilitarianism

    726 Words  | 2 Pages

    On page 82 of MP, Barcalow describes Act-Utilitarianism as “only the act that will, under the circumstances, produce the greatest increase in total well-being (or the smallest decrease in total well-being) is morally right.” Meaning that an Act-Utilitarian operates under one principle: one should only ever do, that is, through action, what either ends with maximum increase or minimum decrease in well-being. Another faction of Utilitarianism discerns itself as Rule-Utilitarianism. On page 90 of MP, Barcalow describes Rule-Utilitarianism as collection of moral rules that are correct moral rules because they “produce more total well-being if followed than if they’re not followed.” Meaning that for a Rule-Utilitarian theft is immoral because it produces less total well-being. However, thievery would be permitted, as a rule, if somehow it produced more total well-being. On page 85 of MP, Barcalow says Act-Utilitarianism cannot be applied to “determine the moral rightness or wrongness of kinds of actions.” The Act-Utilitarian

    Read More

  • Understanding Utilitarianism: Ethics in Practice

    700 Words  | 2 Pages

    In general, the term utilitarianism can be defined as the ethical or right action is the one that results in the greatest good for the greatest number. Therefore, some people suggest that rightness or wrongness is determine by numbers that are total the positives and the negatives outcome of an action or the one that produces the highest score of positives or negatives that is the most ethical, or right, thing to do (Neher, W. W. Sandin, P.J., 2007, p. 61).

    Read More

  • Exploring Utilitarianism: A Comparative Analysis

    1013 Words  | 3 Pages

    What is utilitarianism? Through philosophy, John Stuart Mill aims to answer this question. He asserts that one’s actions must be right if the greatest number of individuals are pleased with the greatest good. The theory of utilitarianism is straightforward. One must always chose the action that will contribute to the greatest good. In any instance, one must chose the action that will promote the greatest good for the greatest number. This principle allows one to decipher any action that may be considered right or wrong. On the contrary, Immanuel Kant and Kwame Appiah challenge the method of utilitarianism as a means to determine which rights countries should enforce. Kant asserts that human rights are individual and universal, whereas Appiah focuses on cosmopolitanism.

    Read More

  • Utilitarianism In John Stuart Mill

    1161 Words  | 3 Pages

    Mill says “Of two pleasures, if there be one to which all or almost all who have experience of both give a decided preference, irrespective of any feeling of moral obligation to prefer it, that is the more desirable pleasure.” (541) The pleasure that people choose over a different pleasure, event though they may undergo more discomfort to get it is the pleasure deemed higher. Moreover, Mill states that people will always prefer the pleasure with the highest appeal, “few human creatures would consent to be changed into any of the lower animals, for promise of the fullest allowance of the beast’s pleasures” (541). Since the human already has a higher level of pleasure than that of the animal, the human will never choose to go down a level even if they were promised endless amounts of pleasure

    Read More

  • Negative Effects Of Utilitarianism

    1142 Words  | 3 Pages

    The NSA or {The National Security Agency} has been under scrutiny by the media for engaging in

    Read More

  • Qualitative Hedonism and Happiness

    1199 Words  | 3 Pages

    Mill begins his essay on Utilitarianism by explaining his Greatest Happiness Principle, stating actions are right in that they promote happiness and actions are wrong if they take happiness away (Mill, “What Utilitarianism Is,” para 2). Following from this idea, happiness is pleasure, and unhappiness is pain and the privation of pleasure (Mill, “What Utilitarianism Is,” para 2). In defending the equivalence between happiness and pleasure from his critics, Mill makes the claim that there is “the superiority of mental over bodily pleasures chiefly in the greater permanency, safety, uncostliness, etc., of the former” (Mill, “What Utilitarianism Is,” para 4). He claims that pleasures can differ both in quality and qua...

    Read More

  • Advantages And Disadvantages Of Act Utilitarianism

    896 Words  | 2 Pages

    Utilitarianism is defined as a theory asserting that the morally right action is the one that produces the most favorable balance of good over evil. There are two major types of utilitarianism: act-utilitarianism and rule-utilitarianism. Act-utilitarianism asserts that the morally right action is the one that directly produces the most favorable balance of good or evil. A rule-utilitarianism asserts that the morally right action is the one covered by a rule that if generally followed would produce the most favorable balance of good over evil. The difference between act-utilitarianism and rule-utilitarianism is that act-utilitarianism is the belief that it is fine to break a rule as long as it brings a greater good, while rule-utilitarianism

    Read More

  • Kant On Cheating

    986 Words  | 2 Pages

    Cheating is wrong, under no circumstances even with good intention, would this be acceptable. If we challenge that could cheating only certain circumstances be wrong? Applying principles of prima facie, defined as not being absolute (Rowan). The potential consequences of the teacher losing his job, the student getting expelled, other students relationships being impacted, how each would deal with the moral consequences in the future are all to be considered.

    Read More

  • Arguments Against Utilitarianism

    1464 Words  | 3 Pages

    As a philosophical approach, utilitarianism generally focuses on the principle of “greatest happiness”. According to the greatest happiness principle, actions that promote overall happiness and pleasure are considered as right practices. Moreover, to Mill, actions which enhance happiness are morally right, on the other hand, actions that produce undesirable and unhappy outcomes are considered as morally wrong. From this point of view we can deduct that utilitarianism assign us moral duties and variety of ways for maximizing pleasure and minimizing pain to ensure “greatest happiness principle”. Despite all of moral duties and obligations, utilitarian perspective have many specific challenges that pose several serious threats which constitute variety of arguments in this essay to utilitarianism and specifically Mill answers these challenges in his work. These arguments can be determinated and analyzed as three crucial points that seriously challenges utilitarianism. The first issue can be entitled like that utilitarian idea sets too demanding conditions as to act by motive which always serves maximizing overall happiness. It creates single criterion about “being motived to maximize overall happiness” but moral rightness which are unattainable to pursue in case of the maximizing benefit principle challenges utilitarianism. Secondly, the idea which may related with the first argument but differs from the first idea about single criterion issue, utilitarianism demands people to consider and measuring everything which taking place around before people practice their actions. It leads criticism to utilitarianism since the approach sees human-beings as calculators to attain greatest happiness principle without considering cultural differ...

    Read More

  • Persuasive Essay On Academic Cheating

    1206 Words  | 3 Pages

    From a young age we are taught the differences between right and wrong, but as we get older the line between moral and immoral is often blurred. Things that were once thought of as unacceptable are now perfectly fine in our minds. Have you ever seen anyone cheat on an assignment or exam? Do you know anyone that’s been expelled from school for cheating? What if it was discovered that a U.S. senator plagiarized his college thesis paper? Imagine if it got out that one of the most respected universities in the U.S. was involved in a huge fraud scandal that involved thousands of students. Academic cheating is a terrible offense because it is unethical, self-degrading, and can be detrimental to the learning environment.

    Read More

  • Importance of Utilitarianism

    556 Words  | 2 Pages

    When it comes to utilitarianism, the definition or what it actually is differs from one person to another depending on their situation. It all boils down to one question: “What will make the most people the most happy?” Even though it seems like an easy question to answer, the decisions you must face in answering it are not. Should you make yourself happy or should you make others happy? Is it okay to sacrifice the happiness of a couple of people if it makes everyone else happy? What happens to the few who get sacrificed for the happiness of the many others? Philosophically speaking, utilitarianism is the belief that a morally good action is one that helps the greatest number of people. John Stuart Mill starts off by stating very little progress has been made when it comes to setting standards to judge what is morally right or wrong. Mill’s thoughts and reasoning on what he believes utilitarianism counts for, especially in the specific categories he has mentioned, are correct in many eyes.

    Read More

More about Pros And Cons Of Utilitarianism

Open Document