Pros And Cons Of Tyranny Essay

Many years ago, leaders were chosen to lead states. Although, some leaders become power hungry, driving themselves into tyrants. Tyranny can’t only be forced by one person, even a group. There are many forms of tyranny, however is most commonly done by one person. The constitution was to protect a state and people without tyranny overriding them. What did the constitution do to defend themselves and their people from the accumulation of all powers in the same hands. The constitution guarded against tyranny using rules called Federalism, Separation of Powers, and Checks & Balances.
A procedure the constitution defended themselves from the accumulation of powers in the same hands was using an arrangement called Federalism. The central governments’ and states’ capability were all confined, all valued

As James Madison had once stated, only one person is to be elected to serve in the house of representatives, he/she cannot for any reason be able to serve in the supreme court. Stated in doc. B was “ The accumulation of all powers, Legislative, Executive, and Judiciary, the same hands, whether hereditary, self appointed , or even elective, may be justly pronounced the very definition of tyranny…” this statement in other words explains there can be many forms of tyranny. (Doc. B) Another potential way the constitution restrained tyranny was by obtaining a procedure called Checks & Balances. All branches held constitutional managment over each other, in the document the Legislative branch could impeach the president and remove him.her from office. While the Executive branch could nominate judges, and the Judicial branch could declare laws unconstitutional. Thanks to the there was a reduced risk of tyranny becoming an issue. Each branch was given a special duty, which included correcting the others when needed, they were to fix illegal and unconstitutional