Pros And Cons Of The Death Penalty
opinionated Essay
781 words
Throughout the world, all nations either have the death penalty or had used it before. The death penalty is the most severe form of punishment a judge or jury can enforce on someone. The death penalty is a cruel and unfair system. It should be abolished because it favors racism. Also, it is financially too expensive for taxpayers. It violates the Bill of Rights and prisoner’s family suffer seeing their loved one’s put to death. The idea of life in prison is enough of a punishment for anyone. The Death penalty should be abolished because it favors racism. Over the past decade Prison Policy Initiative, claim “42.9% Percent of death row that is African-American while the population of African Americans is 12.8% in the U.S. Eleven and two percent of death row that is Hispanic while the …show more content…
In this essay, the author
- Opines that the death penalty should be abolished because it favors racism and violates the bill of rights.
- Argues that the death penalty should be abolished because it favors racism.
- Opines that the death penalty favors racism and is financially too expensive for taxpayers. the government could save money by sending prisoners to life in prison without parole and to offer more public transportation.
- Opines that the death penalty violates a citizen's rights. we can't ignore the principles and fundamental rules which our nation was built to protect.
- Opines that life in prison is enough of a punishment for anyone. inmates are aware they would be behind bars for the rest of their life and there's nothing they can do about it.
- Concludes that the death penalty is an idea which people should defer from. society should not decide who gets to live and who doesn't. everyone deserves a second chance in life.
According to the Death Penalty Center “cases without the death penalty cost $740,000, while cases where the death penalty is sought cost $1.26 million”. This is a lot of money to execute someone. Our government could use that money to fund different projects and help better our communities by building research centers or more libraries. Also, as the Law Dictionary states, “the average cost of housing an inmate in the U.S is $31,286 in 2012”. This is not a lot of money considering that it cost “$1.26 million” just to execute someone. Our government could save a lot of money by sentencing prisoners to life in prison without parole. The government can use this money to offer more public transportation. According to Prison Policy Initiative, “the amount that California could save $90 million per year by abolishing capital punishment”. California could use this money to fund their criminal enforcement task force to protect citizens and keep the state safer. Taxpayers shouldn’t pay an increasing amount of tax to execute someone when they should be lawfully punished in a cheaper and moral
Related
- analytical
- opinionated
- Death Penaltyanalytical essayThe use of the death penalty in the United States has been a great debate for many years. One of the major aspects of this debate is whether or not we should continue to use this form of punishment for criminals. In my opinion, the death penalty should be abolished because it costs taxpayers much more than sending an inmate to prison and there is no factual evidence that it has any greater deterrent effect than life imprisonment.
In this essay, the author
- Opines that the death penalty should be abolished because it costs taxpayers more than sending an inmate to prison and there is no factual evidence that it has any greater deterrent effect than life imprisonment.
- Argues that the death penalty should be abolished because the expenses of capital punishment exceed those of life imprisonment.
- Explains that in texas, life imprisonment costs three times less than the $2.3 million average spent on each capital case. costanzo states that eliminating the death penalty in california would save taxpayers $90 million dollars every year.
- Analyzes how a group of students at the university of texas state that it is more beneficial to our economy to use the death penalty.
- Opines that the death penalty should be abolished because there is no conclusive evidence that portrays it as a deterrent to crime.
667 wordsRead More - Capital Punishment Persuasive Essayopinionated essay“Our position… is that there is no place for capital punishment… We believe that justice for all is better served by a sentence of life imprisonment.”(Szumski 170) The administration of Capital punishment in the United States has been a failed experiment. Capital punishment or “The death penalty” is the legally authorized killing of a human being as punishment for a crime. The entire process of Capital punishment is fraught with error, since 1973, over 87 inmates have been released from death row due to their innocence being proven. (Blecker, 12) Capital punishment attacks the poor, as well as the black community. For the worst crimes, life without parole is better. Not only is the death penalty discriminatory and unethical, it violates the
In this essay, the author
- Opines that the administration of capital punishment in the united states has been a failed experiment.
- Opines that by allowing the death penalty to stand in our judicial system, our government is putting itself above the law.
- Analyzes how greg wilhoit spent five years on death row after he was falsely accused of murdering his wife. he was not fortunate to hire an expensive lawyer, but his parents hired a top defense attorney.
- Explains that the death penalty has a long history of wrongful convictions, especially those based on racial bias and discrimination.
- Opines that america has taken tremendous pride in the legitimacy of its justice system since its creation. having an excellent lawyer is not a privilege that most people defending the death penalty have.
- Argues that people who oppose the death penalty are mentally inhumane and do not fear death. they believe that the process will cost taxpayers less than life imprisonment without release.
1873 wordsRead More - capital punishmentanalytical essayThe death penalty dates back to the eighteenth century. Criminals received many punishments throughout the centuries such as hangings, quartering, and burning at the stake. The death penalty consists of lethal injections today. The death penalty is a controversial topic because some people are for the death penalty and some people are against the death penalty. There is no one consensus for or against the death penalty. Although there have been many studies on the immorality of the death penalty and whether or not to limit the death penalty in some ways or just completely abolish it all together. It appears that more people are leading towards getting rid of the death penalty, but the courts want to keep it because the courts argue that that it is a successful fear tactic and may prevent future crimes. The death penalty is inhumane, biased, arbitrary, and an unsuccessful fear tactic so it should be abolished.
In this essay, the author
- Opines that the death penalty is a controversial topic because there is no consensus for or against it.
- Argues that the death penalty is inhumane because it takes a person’s life away in the form of revenge.
- Analyzes how thom brooks' view supports the claim that the death penalty is inhumane because people are wrongly convicted.
- Explains that the death penalty is biased because an african american is more likely to be sentenced to death than a white person.
- Opines that the death penalty is gender biased because a man is more likely to receive t death imposed on them because women seem innocent and society portrays them as fragile. butler's view supports the fact that gender bias is an issue when it comes to the
- Argues that the death penalty is arbitrary because it's a random selection process on who lives and who dies, and violates the eighth amendment.
- Argues that the death penalty is an unsuccessful fear tactic because it does not stop criminals from committing crime.
- Concludes that the death penalty is inhumane because it violates the eight amendment by showing cruel and unusual punishment towards people who have been put on death row.
1281 wordsRead More - The Death Penalty is Cruel and Unusual Punishmentopinionated essayThe death penalty is racist, it punishes the poor, it causes the innocent to die, it is not a deterrent against violent crime, and it is cruel and unusual punishment. More than half of the countries in the world have already abolished the death penalty and the U.S should abolish it too. It is wrong and cruel. Some states in the U.S still hold the death penalty because they think it will keep U.S citizens safe, but we can just keep the murders in a separate patrolled jail. Abolish it and we may save the lives of the people that may have been executed innocent.
In this essay, the author
- Argues that the death penalty should be abolished because it is racist, punishes the poor, causes the innocent to die, and is cruel and unusual punishment.
- Opines that the death penalty is a cruel and unusual punishment, but the constitution should abolish it.
- Opines that if the u.s wants to abolish the death penalty all together, it would be easy because studies show that 68% of the sentences actually don?t happen!
- Explains that the 5th and 8th amendments have to do with the death penalty.
- Explains that the commission of human rights is a group of people putting guidelines for the death penalty so it really isn't cruel and unusual punishment.
- Explains that there are five ways to execute a person. the most common are lethal injection and electrocution.
- Explains that the electric chair gives off 2300 volts for about ten seconds, followed by a low voltage of 1000, and the murderer is usually dead. lethal gas is now only used in california and arizona.
- Explains that race has become a big issue concerning the death penalty since 1930. black people kill whites 2.6 times more frequently than white men.
- Opines that executing juvenile offenders and the mentally ill, ignoring international norms against the death penalty in the u.s. is showing disrespect for international human rights.
- Opines that a million dollars spent today is more costly to the state than one spent over forty years. millions spent on the death penalty can be used for better reasons to keep the cities safe.
- Explains that everything that is necessary for an ordinary trial is needed for a death penalty case. there will be more pre-trial motions filed and answered.
- Opines that the death row should be abolished all together.
- Opines that the death penalty is racist, punishes the poor, causes the innocent to die, and is cruel and unusual punishment.
1325 wordsRead More - Pros And Cons Of The Death Penaltyopinionated essayAccording to oxforddictionaries.com capital punishment is defined as the legally authorized killing of someone as punishment for a crime. As of May 2, 2013 Maryland joined the 17 states that have abolished the death penalty,this means as of now 32 states still allow capital punishment. Death Penalty Facts stats that over two thirds of the world’s countries have rid themselves of this unconstitutional law in all practices. Death Penalty Facts goes on to say that 14 states without the death penalty had homicide rates at or near national rates (http://www.amnestyusa.org/pdfs/DeathPenaltyFactsMay2012.pdf). According to Natalie Leppard, PhD that in 2010, 46 people was sentenced the death penalty.Since the death penalty was reinstated in 1976 this
In this essay, the author
- Opines that capital punishment should be abolished because it's unconstitutional, costs more than just imprisoning inmates, and the rulings are final.
- Explains that even the united states supreme court ruled capital punishment against the constitution. the 8th amendment prohibits cruel and unusual punishments.
- Opines that capital punishment is more cost effective than just keeping the prisoner locked up.
- Compares the cost difference in maryland of a case where no death penalty is sought versus an actual death sentence. capital punishment is not worth 2 million more.
- Opines that capital punishment isn't always accurate with its rulings but the decision is final.
- Opines that the death penalty is a permanent solution and if someone is falsely accused they lose their life.
- Argues that capital punishment works to decrease crime rates with the fear of death. however, there have been no successful studies to support this argument.
- Argues that the cost difference alone should be enough to abolish the death penalty. capital punishment isn't the only option for serious crimes like murder. life without parole is the better alternative.
1013 wordsRead More - What Are The Pros And Cons Of The Death Penaltyanalytical essayAbstract This paper will examine the pros and cons of the death penalty. Is it a deterrent or is that a myth. Does it give the family of the victim peace or does it cause them to suffer waiting for appeal after appeal. What are the forms of execution and any evidence of them being cruel and usual punishment.
In this essay, the author
- Analyzes the pros and cons of the death penalty. does it give the victim's family peace or cause them to suffer waiting for appeal after appeal?
- Explains that capital punishment has been a subject of debate among policymakers, government officials, and citizens alike. the fifth amendment clearly states that someone cannot be deprived of life without due process of law.
- Argues that lethal injection, the gas chamber, and electrocution are unconstitutional and that citizens need to understand that blood is on their hands.
- Explains that electrocution was supposed to be more humane than hanging. it starts with a cruel and agonizing preparation where the offender has all the hair on their body shaved.
- Explains that the average time it takes someone to be put to death in the gas chamber is between ten to eighteen minutes.
- Explains that lethal injection is unreliable and can cause prolonged delays with the inmate strapped to the gurney because a good vein cannot be found.
- Argues that the pros and cons arguments over the use of the death penalty were a fair match until studies of cost, deterrence, closure for victims' families, human rights, pain and suffering and finally wrongful conviction.
- Explains why proponents of the death penalty always say that it is cheaper to put offenders to death when study after study has shown that life without parole.
- Concludes that the death penalty should be ruled unconstitutional because it violates the sixth and eighth amendments of the united states constitution.
- Cites aclu's scattered justice: geographic disparities of the death penalty.
- Cites associated press and death penalty information center's definitions of execution methods and facts about the death penalty.
2104 wordsRead More - Argumentative Essay: The Fight For The Death Penaltyanalytical essayThe death penalty honors human dignity by treating the defendant as a moral able to control his/her own destiny for good or bad behavior. I believe it is an asset to society. The death penalty should not be abolished because it will reduce crime rate, it will save us and the government money, and It helps our society.
In this essay, the author
- Argues that the death penalty honors human dignity by treating the defendant as a moral able to control his/her destiny for good or bad behavior.
- Argues that the death penalty should not be abolished because it will save us and the government money.
- Argues that the death penalty should not be abolished because it helps keep our society safer. opponents argue that it makes the crime go up and the streets more dangerous.
- Opines that the death penalty should not be abolished because it will reduce crime rates, save the us and the government money, and it helps our society.
737 wordsRead More - Persuasive Essay On The Death Penaltyopinionated essayThe death penalty is an outdated, costly, discriminating, form of punishment that should be abolished in all states throughout the U.S. Currently, the death penalty is legal in 34 U.S. states. Among those besides the common and heavily expensive lethal injection for killing, states Arizona, Missouri and Wyoming allow gas-chamber executions. Delaware, New Hampshire and Washington state still allow inmates to choose hanging as well as lethal injection. This just shows the barbaric practice of the death penalty and how outdated it is. Besides the discrimination made towards people in cases because of their class or color. Mental health patients are also greatly at risk here in the U.S.
In this essay, the author
- Opines that the death penalty should be abolished in all states throughout the u.s.
- Explains that 150 people punished with the death penalty were later exonerated by the u.s. and others that have been executed despite serious doubts about their guilt.
- Explains that the death penalty was reinstated by the u.s. supreme court in 1976, since december 2014 1,394 people have been executed. capital punishment does not seem to change every criminal’s mind about killing innocent people.
- Explains that the u.s. condemns the practice of murder by committing murder in order to teach the killer a lesson, but what do they learn?
- Recounts how a 14-year-old african-american boy, george stinney, was executed in the u.s. in 1944 for killing two young white girls. he was interrogated and confessed to the crime.
- Opines that the courts don't see anything wrong with stinney's execution in the electric chair.
- Narrates a horrible case in 1989 when an innocent man was punished with the death penalty in texas because the witness in the end said "latinos all look alike, how was i supposed to know they were different men?"
- Explains that mental health and the death penalty are an even more pressing topic because these accused are unfit to be held for their actions and if declared mentally ill are not aware of what they are doing.
- Explains that steven staley was paranoid schizophrenic and killed a hostage in an attempted robbery in 1989. in 2006, prosecutors forced him to take medication to establish his competence.
- Analyzes pope francis' letter to the president of the international commission against the death penalty, about the catholic church's disagreement with the method.
- Explains that bill cosby and his wife didn't want the death penalty because they believed it would not bring anything from it.
- Opines that the lethal lottery should be abolished in all u.s. states, not just to fight murder with murder.
1148 wordsRead More - The Pros And Cons Of The Death Penaltyanalytical essayThe United States criminal justice system is one of the most controversial of all industrialized countries due to criticism over its overpopulated prisons and the increasing expenses necessary to maintain them. Among these prevalent issues is whether the U.S. should continue to use the death penalty as the ultimate punishment for the most dangerous criminals currently incarcerated. The argument in favor of preserving the death penalty claim its use will aid in permanently eliminating the threat of killers and sociopaths from society while also bringing justice for the victims. The argument against the death penalty however, states that society should have a moral obligation to protect human life rather than take it and be superior to psychotic killers. Although the idea of permanently removing the vilest human beings from society may seem easier and less expensive than having them locked up in prison for life, the reality is inmates on death row require extensive amount of time, money, and resources before they can be put to death. The American justice system is too overpopulated and ineffective in executing murderers and should therefore remove the
In this essay, the author
- Opines that killing another human is an acceptable form of acquiring retribution and peace of mind. however, many families of victims who initially wanted the murderer to be executed often change their perspectives over time.
- Argues that edward koch's argument for the death penalty was based on a sentimental desire for justice, but he failed to acknowledge the detrimental economic impact of maintaining capital punishment.
- Argues that the american justice system is too overpopulated and ineffective in executing murderers.
- Argues that the number of criminals on death row continues to grow due to the country's criminal justice systems ineffectiveness.
1467 wordsRead More - The Pros And Cons Of The Death Penaltyopinionated essay“1,436 people were executed in the United States from 1977 through May 2016” (Should the death 1) The death penalty is the punishment of execution, administered to someone legally convicted of a capital crime. “The first execution in what is now the United States took place in Virginia. Captain George Kendall was executed in the Jamestown colony in 1608 for spying for Spain” (Virginia 1). The death penalty can result in cases such as the murder of a government official, kidnapping resulting in death, running a large-scale drug enterprise, and treason. An example, the “DC Snipers” shooting several civilians such as Premkumar Walekar and Sarah Ramos in the year 2002. The “DC Snipers” were John Allen Muhammad and Lee Boyd Malvo (Virginia 1). Many citizens of today’s society oppose the acts of the death penalty because it goes against the eighth amendment.
In this essay, the author
- Explains that the death penalty is the punishment of execution, administered to someone legally convicted of a capital crime.
- Explains that the death penalty is equivalent to the acts and that it became reinstated in virginia by the supreme court on october 1, 1975.
- Argues that the death penalty should continue to be legal because it does not act under any cruel or unusual punishment.
- Opines that the death penalty is a final act, not first. the 5th amendment guarantees that no one shall be deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process of law.
- Argues that the death penalty should stay legal because it will lower future crime rates.
- Explains that virginia has one of the highest executions in the country, but many death sentences have dramatically dropped from the year 2003 to 2015.
- Opines that the death penalty should stay legal because it will give peace to the victims and their families.
- Opines that people should not think of death penalty because a person killed someone else, but support it because it gives relief to their surroundings.
- Opines that the death penalty should remain legal because it does not violate the constitution, it lowers future crime rates, and it allows peace for the victims.
- Opines that the death penalty is important for everyone to understand so we can keep our families safe and aware.
1489 wordsRead More