Pros And Cons Of The Day-Age Theory Of Creationism

599 Words2 Pages

The Day-Age theory of creationism is the theory that the six “days”, in the Genesis creation story, are ages. These time periods, in which creation gradually took place, last up to millions or billions of years. One of the first proponents of the Day-Age theory was Charles Lyell, author of Principles of Geology. Charles Lyell believed in a gradual formation of Earth, especially when considering geology. Also in the 19th century, his pupil, John Dawson, and Arnold Guyot supported the Day-Age theory of creationism. Hugh Ross, founder of the ministry Reasons to Believe, is a modern day supporter of the Day-Age theory. This theory is a combination of both Biblical views and scientific reasoning and knowledge.
The language of the Bible, ancient Hebrew, has limited vocabulary. The Hebrew word “yom” can be defined as both a literal 24 hour day or an age, up to millions or even billions of years. The word “yom” is used both ways in the Bible, so it is reasonable to believe that the days of creation could have been ages. Understanding this principle, the Day-Age theory of creationism …show more content…

Although this theory clearly supports God’s creation of the universe, the Day-Age theory remains open minded to microevolution and gradual forms of macroevolution guided by the hand of God. The ages of creation allow for a sufficient amount of microevolution to occur. The Day-Age theory of creationism, requires and supports the creation of different and unique kinds of plants and animals. Each plant, animal, and human created by was incredibly and remains incredibly unique and complex. This fact is not contradicted by the Day-Age theory of creationism. The instantaneous creation of organisms, the complexity of humans, a sufficient amount of time for microevolution to occur, and the diversity of organisms are all coherent with and are accepted by the Day-Age theory of

Open Document