Prior to the arrival of David Homer, General Mills Canada had been a successful subsidiary of the General Mills brand. Although employees at General Mills Canada have generated positive sales growth every year before his tenure, Homer notices a lack of initiative, drive, and desire to embrace fundamental changes by his employees, a sign of progress hindered by risk aversion. He notices that data is pouring into the company and employees are using this data to analyze potential opportunities for growth, yet they are reluctant to take any actions. Thus, his ultimate challenge is to integrate innovative thinking into the General Mills Canada culture, and determine what “processes and tools” to use to achieve this goal, since employees are generally risk averse as a consequence of the company’s collectivist culture.
General Mills Canada is declining in sales due to a lack of innovation. For instance, Homer notices that risk aversion within the company is causing it to not perform at its fullest potential. Therefore, one can assume that “employees offer few new ideas or few ideas that are well outside of what is considered safe or ordinary” out of fear that such ideas will hinder General Mills’ success. The employees’ risk aversion causes the company to continue offering mature products such as Cheerios, Nature Valley granola bars, Green Giant vegetables, and Old El Paso taco and seasoning products, which can only change in limited ways. Another issue is that employees in the Marketing, Finance, Sales, Consumer Insights, and other departments, stick with their own department, are collaborate only within their department, and do not embrace individualism. Homer posits, “we found …that our collaborative culture made it so that ever...
... middle of paper ...
...quipment or at least renovations to an existing building. There will also be a demand for more labor to operate in the larger space, as well as the costs of insurance. Utility costs will also increase as a result of the increased R&D. Benefits to the solution do very well against the costs. First, more lab space ultimately means more room for innovation and growth. The new space with better equipment will allow more advanced work to be completed accurately. Eventually, employees will be more eager to perform with the existence of an incubation space. ,
Ultimately, the best solution for Homer and General Mills Canada is to find existing employees who are ambitious, inspiring, and charismatic, and want to innovate. They can serve as innovation ambassadors and mentors to help and inspire risk averse employees to express their ideas and revolutionize the company.
Don’t feel like cooking tonight or going for carry out, no problem have a Marie Callender’s Turkey Pop Pie or maybe something exotic like P. F. Chang’s Mongolian Style Chicken. No matter what may satisfy your taste buds if it can be found in your freezer or pantry chances are it’s one of ConAgra’s various brands. ConAgra’s Foods brands can be found in most American’s households. With their commitment to provide products that deliver outstanding taste, nutrition and value ConAgra have created ways to improve sustainable business practices and create innovative programs that deliver on their promise of being a leading corporation. By developing organizational structures ConAgra Foods has influenced employee’s to maximize their full potential, develop group cohesiveness, and embrace the inclusion of diversity in the workplace ConAgra is able to provide
There is also no form of standardized training throughout the organization. Employee morale and employee relations are lower than should be expected, due to miscommunication and lack of an established strategy. There is an absence of consistency in various ways regarding branding and identity as well. No two stores appear to be alike, names vary and locations are unpredictable. Customers also complain that the menus are inconsistent. It is also evident that reliable communication is lacking. For example, GC3 has customer comment cards, but, as the case study explained, GC3 management is not sure if they are being reviewed or taken into consideration. More so, GC3 remains unclear if they are considered one company, or three separate companies. GC3’s product portfolio is becoming stagnant, and there is an apparent need to refresh the menu and align it with their competitors. Profits are falling behind, and there is nothing in place to enable GC3 to understand what products and what stores need to be evaluated. Lastly, GC3 management is becoming disgruntled. This aggravation is evident within the Pittsburgh locations. Due to this insubordinate behavior, corporate culture in the Columbus locations has started to
First, addressing perceived authenticity of social mission in a changing marketplace. In a book called The Omnivore’s Dilemma, Michael Pollan, criticized Whole Foods and business like it to task for contributing the rise of industrial organic farms. As Whole Foods purchased from natural foods farming giants and he accused the company of ignoring the local focused, sustainable values that it supposedly acclaimed. Second, focus on suitable acquisition candidates to continue upwards growth trend. As it was said earlier that its strategy to increase its competitive market by acquiring Wild Oats, it faced a challenge from FTC (Federal Trade Commission) who was trying to stop the acquisition, fearful of the organic supermarket industry being monopolized by Whole Foods. Despite its challenges, I think it is possible in scale and profits and stay true to a social mission. According to Mackey, he saw a synergy from this tension and he called it “conscious capitalism” where this system as based on the pursuit of a deeper purpose beyond making profits. The best way to maximize profits is to not make them a primary goal of a business and I believe that the most successful businesses is to put customer
The purpose of this case study is to explore the implications for expanding the products offered by Mountain Man Brewing Company (MMBC) from one product, Mountain Man Lager, to adding a Light version of the beer. This paper will evaluate the following:
Case study number two is a four-page article written by Marian L. Houser and Astrid Sheil, and it’s titled “How Do You Get Anything Done Around Here?” The article focuses on the concept of real organizational experiences, but primarily Kate Elliot’s experience and dissatisfaction with her job at Donaldson Family Foods, Inc. Kate’s a hard-working, educated woman who is initially impressed with the Donaldson Food, Inc., especially at the opportunity that she has to become the national brand manager. As time goes on, and her first project’s assigned, Kate notices countless negatives within the organization, including how the company remains a low-growth business, its employees’ lack of competitiveness and hurry, and the SMART group’s “Black Hole,” a term referring to the grinding halt that’s applied to all initiatives, ideas, and proposals. In this case, Kate’s cooking bag project faces the dueling black hole. Throughout my paper, I will relate and apply Kate’s experience to organizational culture and socialization, how the conflict is handled, both verbal and nonverbal communication, and possible suggestions for Kate.
To most consumers Whole Foods is known as a chain grocery store specializing in organic and natural foods. Some may go as far as say the name is synonymous with quality. This comparison is the result of Whole Foods’ marketing their brand successfully to consumers demanding their specialized foods. As with any organization, Whole Foods may consider evaluating their strategic objectives and decide if necessary course corrections are needed to reach their objectives and goals. Through a fundamental and technical analysis, I will discuss Whole Foods’ mission, vision, and goals, their competitive environment, and some factors within their strength, weakness, opportunity, and threat analysis. With such data and information I will recommend, if needed, and strategic changes in order to sustain a competitive advantage.
...oo dominant to change their way of production but if the consumer who pays the money demands a change, change will come. All of these problems evident in the nation’s food and diet present the same question to each person “Are you willing to make an effort for change, or will you remain oblivious and blind to the ever present issues?”.
The film highlights the potential thoughts of previous food company CEO’s now being the political figures that decide their laws and regulations. There is no one governing their decisions that continue to allow the companies to function in unethical standards. The film also highlights the topics of patenting of seeds and how the financial benefits for the companies has destroyed America’s corn farmers. Our nation has become so dependent on cheap and fast food that we have allowed the government to turn a blind eye to the mistreatment of workers in the industry to keep our dollar menus. The film urges us to make smarter decisions about our food consumption which in turn will help bring down the cost of the smart foods we should be
...world has become extremely fast and full of change. If the leader can’t adapt to changing conditions, it is very possible for his firm to be kicked out of the game. How can the firm change, though? The most effective way is to go through new ideas. Here, it reminders me Welch’s famous saying: "Change before you have to."
The company’s approach to motivate employees has been working in a positive way. The employees are satisfied with the family style community, and the productivity has increased as well. The company’s style of treating employees as important partners has been successful in other manufacturing companies too. For example, when Honda opened its first factory in the U.S., the CEO and employees shared the same cafeteria, just like Lincoln.
This case examines issues of asset control for Ben & Jerry’s Homemade, Inc., in light of the outstanding takeover offers by Chartwell Investments, Dreyer‘s Grand, Unilever, and Meadowbrook Lane Capital in January 2000.
The challenge was to overcome the overall resistance to change and find a way to get the organization behind ArcTech Flooring, the new specialty product. A culture of customer disengagement and communication problems among divisions along with past norms held by key senior managers made initiating radical innovation difficult. These norms made up the division's mechanistic organizational structure, incentives that are based on overall sector performance, operational competencies, and low risk culture, all of which hindered innovation. This paper explores the leadership challenges involved in managing strategic change in a highly mature Arctic Timber Engineered Woods Division.
Implementing change in the workplace is a dynamic process. Although change itself can be controlled and limited to some degree, innovation is substantially even more dynamic. This dynamic, unpredictable process introduces vulnerability, which can lead to employee frustration. Just as the scenario addresses, many individuals become motivated at the thought of change and innovation; however, the change does not occur due to resistance or other obstacles. Much of this resistance arises from the unpredictability and vulnerability of the process. Managers must be able to prevent or manage resistance by using tools and strategies to smooth the process.
During the year 2005, Ford Motor Company brought in Alan Mulally, once a leader at the company Boeing. Mulally decided to implement a strategy called ‘One Ford’; this plan would ultimately lead to the employees becoming one team, using one plan, and looking towards one goal. Because this plan was going to execute a complete overhaul on the company, an aggressive training program needed to be put into place for the company to implement the plan correctly. By following this plan, the company would eventually meet their “One Goal”, which was profitable growth for all. By creating a strong product and producing customer loyalty, Alan Mulally knew the company would begin to see positive results and profitable growth. According to Alex Ta...
The fast food restaurant Burger King uses Scientific Management by following a ‘one best way’ method of doing tasks, implemented by Taylor as an advanced form of standardised production. This includes scientifically hiring, training and developing each employee, encouraging a ‘work-for-reward’ based mind-set, and dividing workload between managers and workers fairly with regards to specific roles. This provides a stable working environment where workers work harder under better working conditions. Burger King shows evidence of a modern organisations that can reflect the scientific management principles; as Burger King consists of a system that offers rewards to employees for meeting the objective goals. Taylor stated that if workers are given no incentives despite putting in more effort, workers will be discouraged to work. Burger King uses a competitive wage and promotion programme where hard work is recognised and rewarded. Regular monitoring of performance and pushing for improvement avoids ‘under working’. Therefore, creating supervisors and leaders ensure discipline and makes a business perform well. The challenges that encouraged Taylor’s time and motion studies is still present within organisations today. However, management has developed new ways of encouraging output. In today’s business organisations employers are more concerned with ‘performance’ rather than