Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: What is justice
John Williams Cat Weiner Proper Allocation for College Scholarships Fairness is a principle that western society ingrains in its people. But what is fair when everyone cannot get the same treatment. Whether it is vaccinations, welfare, or in this case college scholarships, allocation must be used when there are not enough resources to go around. There are many ways to allocate resources, some working better than others. We must analyze all of the methods of allocation to determine what the most fair course of action is. One of the methods that could be used to determine who gets a college scholarship could be the lottery approach. Everyone who wants to get a scholarship could apply to the lottery program and then the winners would be picked. …show more content…
This could be done by giving the scholarships to those who request them first. In this scenario, it is not the fairest system because again, it does not account for merit or help any extra people get into this program. It could leave people in poorer areas at a disadvantage if they did not have the resources to call, or go claim the scholarship. This is another system of allocation that should not be used in an instance like this. A more appropriate method that could be utilized is the sickest first method. In this scenario it will be interpreted as the poorest first approach. It would work by giving those who are economically disadvantaged the scholarships. Again, merit is not considered, but it is different from the latter because in the long run it could give people the resources they need to rise out of poverty. Therefore this method would be more appropriate and would be considered just. Many people have argued that a younger first system of allocation is the fairest. In this case, it will be called the freshman first system. The scholarships could go to those who are going into their first year. If this were done, merit could be used to determine who gets the scholarship among the uprising freshman. This system is appropriate for scholarships, but some may criticize that it leaves out the …show more content…
Those who have more school left ahead of them (in terms of credits) would have a better chance of getting a scholarship. This would mean prioritizing students who are entering college for the first time with no transferrable credits (high school AP course credits for example). This would make getting a scholarship harder for second year students, and students that may have taken time off of school. This principle is not necessarily the most sensible or just in this application because students who are very close to finishing but don’t have the last bit of funds to, and students that may have taken time off for medical or other critical reasons and are looking to return to their studies are at a serious
In one particular article, the main character has $150,000 that she wanted to give as a scholarship to someone who was in need. Although she grew up poor as was not able to go to college, she wanted to make sure that someone who was like her when she was younger had the chance to get an education. All that she had besides the money she was gonna use for the scholarship was just enough to get
The idea of freedom and equal opportunity that America was built on has sadly been lost and replaced with a system of quality education only being accessible by the wealthy. In-state college tuition should be free for all students meeting admission requirements, allowing students from the full spectrum of economic backgrounds to have the same opportunity to receive the same education. The incidence of poverty in the U.S. is directly linked to educational level. When a college degree is earned, income levels rise (College Board). The best use of federal government anti-poverty funds is not another welfare or assistance program; it is to make college education affordable for everyone.
Frank, S., & Education Resource, S. (2012). Fair Student Funding and Other Reforms: Baltimore's Plan for Equity, Empowerment, Accountability and Improvement. Education Resource Strategies.
I believe a selection committee should choose the scholarship recipients. I believe that the committee should be comprised five members from various departments around campus. I believe the five members should be but not limited to the Multicultural Liaison (Josh Harvey), Director of Admission (Amy Hayes), Director of Rise^3 (Jessica Pincham-King), a professor and board Member.
I see this as a way to give anyone a chance for an education if they want it. That way instead of worrying how to pay for college you can worry about getting the grades that a college needs to beat this crazy admissions process.
Students who are able to afford college take advantage of the free education, and in the end low- and middle class income individuals still struggle with the other impending costs, because college has costs beyond tuition. Continually, Catherine Hill argued in her article that colleges should ask students what they are willing to pay instead of “making it free for everyone.” She argues that only about ⅓ of full-time students actually pay for full college tuition, and “free college would disproportionately favor wealthy students without addressing underlying issues that prevent low- and middle-income students from graduating or excelling in higher education.” The inevitable attention to debt, but there are issues within the higher education system that go beyond
The issue of scholarship selection criteria is mainly one of morality. It is not fair for students to be judged only the number of dollars in their pockets when applying for scholarships. Students who obtain scholarships receive them because they are special in some way. Special students should be rewarded in the form of a scholarship. Should talents be taken out of the equation, the students may not try as hard to excel at their talents. There is less motivation for students to achieve because they learn that hard work is not rewarded with scholarships. This is a horrible lesson to teach the students of this country. It is immoral and unfair.
After declaring Obama's proposal, Gerard moves on to explaining how this would affect equality and make universities more affordable. Moreover, from the quotes "the department will look at outcomes including graduation rates, employment rates and salaries" and "Obama would like to reward colleges that earn good grades", the reader is presented with compelling evidence that this reform would not only subsidise cost-effective universities, but will also generally decrease tuition fees. By "grading" universities, the US government is able to efficiently allocate its limited resources to universities that spend their money effectively instead of squandering it on "dubious expenditure". Therefore, Gerard strikingly proclaims that cost-effective universities will not only make tuition affordable for the populace, but will, in addition, provide society with vital specialists that will aid economic growth and
For this reason it is essential to eliminate funding inequalities all students deserve a high quality education especially in the low-income areas. Providing more money to these areas can reduce crime and gang activity, lower the teen birth rate, restore self-confidence, provide these students and opportunity to attend college, also break the cycle of poverty. The President “Race to the Top Program” is a start but more need to be done from the local and state level.
It was shocking to see how financial aid system works for others. In her study, one of her students who is over 18 and under 24 still considered to be a dependent under parents income, even if they do not live in same household. I think if the student no longer lives with their parents then that should not apply to that individual. Some standard rules are not equal or fair because it doesn’t take into account
Johnstone, Bruce. "Investing more equitably and efficiently in higher education, creating value for America." National Dialogue on Student Financial Aid (2003): 6-10. Print.
Hence, in the future, a student 's focus can be directed towards other aspects instead of earning enough income to satisfy fines. The weakness presented by this solution is the time required. Scholarships often call for essays, and there is no guarantee that a student will get the scholarship. Due to this lack of assurance, scholarships can appear as a risk that is not worth the effort.
As colleges’ funds dry up, colleges must turn to the public to further support higher education. By raising state taxes, colleges can collect funds to help improve the school’s budgets. The state provides funds from the taxes for colleges to receive a certain amount for each student currently enrolled. All community and traditional four year colleges collect these funds in order to maintain the school’s budget. As reporter, Eric Kelderman states, “less than a third of colleges’ budget is based from state taxes”. The school’s budget is how colleges are able to provide academic support programs, an affordable intuition, and hire more counselors. Colleges must now depend on state taxes more than ever for public colleges. Without collecting more funds from state taxes, as author, Scott Carlson explains how Mr. Poshard explains to senators “our public universities are moving quickly toward becoming private universities…affordable only to those who have the economic wherewithal to them” (qtd. in.) Public colleges must be affordable to anyone who wishes to attend. If colleges lack to provide this to students, it can affect dropouts, a student’s ability focus, and cause stress. The problem of lack of funding is that colleges have insufficient funds. Therefore, the best possible solution for the problem of lack of funding would be increasing and collecting more funds from state taxes.
In order for this system to work the best students with A’s will need to receive sixty percent of the total money spent by students bad grades an...
There are two different types of financial aid for college students, merit-based aid and need-based aid. Merit-based aid is given to students with good grades and allows them to not have to pay the full price of college tuition. This allows students who work hard in school to reap some form of reward for their efforts. Need-based aid gives students the ability to continue their education, when they would not have the money for college otherwise. The problem that is faced with the two kinds of aid is which party should receive the money, the hard working students or the lower class students?