Professor Mccloud Analysis

632 Words2 Pages

When Professor McCloud handed out small pieces of chocolate out a few weeks ago, many thoughts crossed my mind. The chocolate was a small, gold-foil wrapped treasure. It was self-described as “extra creamy milk chocolate with toffee & almonds”. This narrative perked the interest of my Id. I bet this candy tastes as good as it sounds, let’s eat it. As I contemplated if I should consume this chocolate immediately or at least wait until I get in the car, Professor McCloud announced that this exact piece of chocolate must be returned on the last day of class. Well, now my ego is intrigued. Perhaps we could eat it on the sly, and just replace it with an identical one. Then professor says, “If you eat it and replace it with another, I won’t know, but I can promise you’ll feel guilty about it …show more content…

She speaks how the child detainees were “privileged”. They were permitted to bring a small item or two with them from France. Christophe’s mother brought two small pieces of chocolate. She told her daughter she would save them for when “you’ve collapsed completely, and really need help. I’ll give you this chocolate and you’ll feel better”. Christophe then tells of a particular day when a pregnant detainee, a woman named Hélène, was giving birth. Her mother explained that Hélène was weak and may not survive the delivery, so she asked Christophe’s permission to give the chocolate to the woman so she and the baby would survive. Christophe agreed; the mother and child survived the delivery. Six months later, the camp was liberated. This personal history depicts chocolate as a source of life. My view of chocolate has now changed. Before learning about Francine and her experience, I saw it as an insignificant piece of candy. Now, knowing how much a single piece of chocolate changed the life of Holocaust prisoners of war, chocolate is weighted with hope and

Open Document