Euthanasia in Greek literally means a “good death”, however, it is still considered to be one of the most controversial issues all around the world. Euthanasia is defined as the practice of intentionally ending a life in order to relieve that person’s pain and suffering. Euthanasia is a fundamental right; everyone has the right to control their body and the right to a good death. Active euthanasia is not much different from assisted-suicide and is more practical in certain situations. One should not have to endure pain and suffering for the rest of their lives when there is a way to end it. Illegalised euthanasia leads to patients seeking other ways to obtain release from their pain. Dying through euthanasia gives patients a sense of dignity …show more content…
In this essay, the author
- Defines euthanasia as the practice of intentionally ending a life in order to relieve that person's pain and suffering.
- Argues that there is no difference between active euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide. the hippocratic oath states that doctors should "do no harm".
- Opines that the legalization of euthanasia does not only relieve the patient from a pain, but also their family members.
- Explains that it is human nature to pursue what we want and ignore consequences that come with it. if suicide is legal in canada but not in many parts of the world, it leads to the increase of crime.
- Explains that patients seek for active euthanasia or physician-assisted suicide when it is illegal. patients, family members, and even physicians are forced to commit crimes to fulfill the patient's wishes.
- Explains that people with serious illness go through pain that is not understandable by others, and they should be allowed to end it because it is their fundamental right.
- Explains that legalizing euthanasia benefits the economy, hospitals, and families everywhere. it can save billions of dollars without affecting health care quality.
- Illustrates the virtue of honour in asking for euthanasia and administering it.
- Explains that euthanasia patients' families have less traumatic grief symptom, less current feeling of grief, and less post-traumatic stress reaction. with a sense of preparedness, families are more supportive and come to one with the decision.
- Opines that legalizing euthanasia is a slippery slope, stating that it should not be seen as immoral because there are more benefits and disputes against it do not hold.
Many argue that active euthanasia is considered to be murder because a patient is given a lethal drug end their life, even though it is voluntary. So, is there any difference between active euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide? Firstly, they key point that makes physician-assisted suicide legal is that the patient takes the drug on their own, whereas in active euthanasia the physician usually injects the drug themselves. Considering this, giving and prescribing are not much different from one another when it is voluntary. Also, some patients lose all bodily functions and are unable to participate in physician-assisted suicide and so their only option is active euthanasia. As a consequence, I see no difference between them because the patient and the doctor act together to end the life of the patient; they both play a major role. Secondly, others will argue that active euthanasia goes against the Hippocratic oath. However, the Hippocratic oath has been changed numerous times in the past. It used to state that women were not allowed to study medicine and that doctors could not break/cut the skin, evidently those were changed. The controversial part is that the oath states that doctors should “do no harm”. In …show more content…
When a physician denies a patient of their right to die when they are in immeasurable pain, it is forcing them to live a life without their dignity. When one is terminally ill and has to spend the rest of their days in bed or hospital room their quality of life deteriorates. Being forced to go through pain and suffering, they lose the a sense of self; when they were able to do things that now their illness holds them back from doing. An example of this would be Tony Nicklinson, who suffered from an incurable disease called ‘Locked-in’ syndrome for seven years. Patients with this illness lose all motor functions but are aware of surrounding and have cognitive abilities. He decided to take the matters into his hands and asked the British court, using a computer since he is unable to speak, to a let physician administer a lethal drug because he himself is unable to do it, without the fear of anyone being prosecuted in the process. His request was denied so he decided to starve himself until he died which took a week. Thus, without the option of active euthanasia, some patients quality of life continues to worsen and are forced to die without dignity. Moreover, there is a virtue of honour in asking for euthanasia and administering it. Honour is respecting one another as human beings. To illustrate, when one asks for euthanasia, the patient and the physician feel honour for each other, because the patient is asking
Related
- analytical
- explanatory
- opinionated
- Euthanasiaanalytical essayThe applied ethical issue of euthanasia, or mercy killing, concerns whether it is morally permissible for a third party, such as a physician, to end the life of a terminally ill patient who is in intense pain. The word euthanasia comes from the Greek words eu (‘well’) and thanatos (‘death’). It means a painless and gentle death. But in modern usage, it has come to imply that someone’s life is ended for compassionate reasons by some passive or active steps taken by another person. The euthanasia controversy is part of a larger issue concerning the right to die. Staunch defenders of personal liberty argue that all of us are morally entitled to end our lives when we see fit. Thus, according to these people, euthanasia is in principle morally permissible. Two additional concepts are relevant to the discussion of euthanasia. First, voluntary euthanasia refers to mercy killing that takes place with the explicit and voluntary consent of the patient, either verbally or in a written document such as a living will. Second, non-voluntary euthanasia refers to the mercy killing of a patient who is unconscious, comatose, or otherwise unable to explicitly make his intentions known. (Downing 1969) In these cases it is often family members who make the request. It is important not to confuse non-voluntary mercy killing with involuntary mercy killing. The latter would be done against the wishes of the patient and would clearly count as murder.
In this essay, the author
- Explains that the euthanasia controversy is part of a larger issue concerning the right to die.
- Explains that there are several arguments in favor of the moral permissibility of euthanasia, including mercy, respect for autonomy, and kant's categorical imperative.
- Explains that many doctors believe that euthanasia is wrong, and that palliative care should be given when people have an incurable illness.
- Analyzes how euthanasia has a long history of philosophical discussion. ancient greek thinkers favored it, even though they opposed suicide.
- Argues that euthanasia is not a question of ending someone's life but the important question is how their life ends. pro-lifers, people who are against it, place the emphasis on killing.
- Opines that euthanasia is a controversial subject and that it should be left to the sufferer's conscience to decide whether they want to end their lives.
1577 wordsRead More - Euthanasia Proexplanatory essayEuthanasia is the intentional killing of someone, by action or neglect, who is defenseless or reliant upon others for their supposed benefit. The word, in its oldest form, meant gentle or good death, but now it is used in the same context as terms like mercy killing, assisted suicide, and physician- assisted death. However, euthanasia is not a recent concern; it has been practiced as early as the 1700’s, but it did not become widely known until the 1900’s when Adolf Hitler euthanized countless of mentally, physically, and terminally ill people in the first attempts to “cleanse” the German population. Euthanasia is only a broad term: there are many subjects that fall under it such as voluntary, involuntary, active, and passive. Voluntary is
In this essay, the author
- Explains that euthanasia is the intentional killing of someone, by action or neglect, who is defenseless or reliant upon others for their supposed benefit.
- Opines that euthanasia eliminates the needless pain and long suffering of those who are dying.
- Opines that euthanasia has its pros and cons. some people fear that it puts the sick or disabled at risk and downgrades their status as human beings.
- Explains that morality plays a large factor on whether euthanasia will be considered something that is used to end suffering, or an armed weapon. as moral dilemmas about ending life become increasingly common, physicians will face questions from patients and their families.
- Opines that euthanasia should not be a crime, as suicide is not morally and legally accepted, and that religious opponents of it believe that killing oneself is to deny god and his rights over our lives.
- Explains that euthanasia comes in several different forms, each of which brings a different set of rights and wrongs.
- Explains that in places where euthanasia is legal, death rates climb proportionately every year. only a small fraction of dutch patients are actually referred for psychiatric evaluation.
- Explains that euthanasia is a negative connotation in modern society. it is strictly regulated and not widely practiced.
- Explains that involuntary active euthanasia is the killing of a person who has not explicitly requested aid in dying.
2300 wordsRead More - Argumentative Essay: The Euthanasia Debateexplanatory essayThroughout history, there has been an ongoing and crucial debate as to whether or not people have the right to end their lives, and under what conditions they may do so. The euthanasia debate has been quite intense, as it touches upon people’s most fundamental values, and provokes the most passionate of emotions. The mere act of euthanasia represents the gentlest way of terminating a person's life in order to relieve them from their suffering. The phrase itself is derived from the Greek word “euthanatos”, which means good or easy death Allowing terminally ill patients the right to decide where, how, & when their life will end is simply proper end-of-life care. It is literally adding insult to injury when we attach a stigmatizing word such as
In this essay, the author
- Explains that euthanasia is the gentlest way of terminating a person's life in order to relieve them from their suffering.
165 wordsRead More - Euthanasiaopinionated essayThe word euthanasia is derived from the Greek words eu, meaning "good", and thanatos, meaning "death." In today's contexts, the word came to describe an intentional termination of patient's life to end his or her suffering. This topic has sparked a great controversy. The basic question posed by euthanasia is should a person who is terminally ill, who feels that his or her life is not worth living because of the unbearable pain, loss of dignity and capability to maintain his or her normal way of life, be given assistance in dying by his or her doctors. The issue today is should this "mercy killings" be legalized or should euthanasia be banned.
In this essay, the author
- Explains that they will focus on the legal aspect of this issue in contemporary america and discuss two different types of euthanasia.
- Explains that euthanasia refers to an intentional termination of a patient's life to end his or her suffering. the question is whether the "mercy killings" should be legalized or banned.
- Explains that there are two different types of euthanasia: active and passive.
- Explains that active euthanasia involves more direct and controversial actions by the doctors, such as administering lethal injection, in response to a request from the patient to end his life.
- Explains that active euthanasia is still illegal in oregon, the only state that permits doctor assistant suicide for terminally ill patients.
- Narrates how their grandfather was diagnosed with cancer less than a year ago. he was healthy and had never had any health problems before.
- Opines that euthanasia should be legalized for terminally ill people who want to live a pain-filled life or have an easy death.
- Opines that religious groups are the biggest opponents of euthanasia. they believe that nobody has a right to take away life from another human being.
- Argues that the idea that doctors are going to abuse euthanasia is called slippery slope. hitler used "mercy killing" to get rid of the sick, disabled, and mentally retarded people in his society.
- Explains that anti-euthanasia groups claim that the driving force behind the first 15 legalized assisted suicides wasn't uncontrollable pain, but rather a desire for personal control over life's end.
- Explains that advocates of the anti-euthanasia movement claim that since oregon state health commission added assisted suicide to its list of services under oregon health plan, low-income families will now be paid by tax payers.
- Opines that health care plans are willing to pay for active euthanasia because it is cheaper than prolonged care services. this crisis existed before the passage of the "death with dignity act."
- Opines that euthanasia is incomplete without mentioning a parallel between it and abortion, since both revolve around personal choice.
- Predicts that euthanasia will be legalized in the united states. the first step, which is usually the hardest one, already took place in oregon.
1326 wordsRead More - The Pros And Cons Of Euthanasia In Health Careexplanatory essayEuthanasia is a word whose roots can be traced back to Greece where it meant good death. It encompasses various dimensions, from active where something is introduced to cause death, to passive where treatment or supportive actions are withheld. It also varies from voluntary euthanasia where one consents to it, to involuntary where a guardian can give consent and doctor assisted in which the doctors prescribes the medication and a third party or patient administers the prescription to cause death. Wishes for premature death have significantly contributed to the long debate regarding the role of this practice in the current health care. The debate however cuts across dynamic and complex aspects like ethical, legal, health, human rights, economic, religious, social, spiritual and cultural aspects of the enlightened society (Math & Chaturvedi, p. 889). Here, this intricate issue is argued from both sides of the ongoing debate and also the plight of the caregivers and the victims.
In this essay, the author
- Explains that euthanasia is a word whose roots can be traced back to greece where it meant good death. wishes for premature death have contributed to the long debate regarding the role of this practice in the current health care.
- Explains that euthanasia has always been defined as easy and gentle death especially in cases of painful and incurable illness. it is a matter of life and death.
- Opines that legalizing euthanasia would eliminate the pain by giving one a peaceful and venerable death.
- Explains visnja strinic's view that legalized euthanasia provides protection for the vulnerable from unfair death and provides the victims an occasion for peaceful and dignified death.
- Explains that the most critical health care arguments in support of euthanasia include the ending of pain and suffering, freedom to choose when and how they die, and the opportunity to have a dignified death.
- Explains that medical ethics do not favor the practice of euthanasia, since traditional medical objectives remain intact. opponents would question the core morality of medicine if the fundamental objective was altered in ways that are not compatible with the protection of human dignity.
- Opines that a doctor's decision to end the life of another person is acting god. legalization of euthanasia translates to more killing and the destruction of life.
- Opines that great medical practices can alleviate pain and suffering as alternative ways compared to euthanasia.
821 wordsRead More - The Pros Of Euthanasiaexplanatory essayDeath is something almost everyone fears, but the people that aren’t afraid are the ones suffering from terminal disease and other life-threatening illness. Euthanasia and physician assisted suicide are very serious topics in the medical community, as supporters to legalization argue that it’s the right of the person to live or die, while on the other side opponents argue legalizing it me1ans that doctors will have the ability to kill patients and that the government approves it. Euthanasia is legal in multiple countries including Netherlands, Switzerland, and Canada. Physician assisted suicide is legal in a lot of countries including; Germany, Japan, and Switzerland. Euthanasia is widely conversed in the world and has been since it was first
In this essay, the author
- Explains that euthanasia and physician assisted suicide are very serious topics in the medical community, as supporters argue that it’s the right of the person to live or die, while opponents argue legalizing it means that doctors will have the ability to kill patients.
- Explains that physician assisted suicide is the giving of lethal injections to a patient to let them use at their own choosing, while euthanasia is direct killing of another person by physician or anybody to ease suffering.
- Explains that euthanasia is categorized into 4 types: passive, active, voluntary, and involuntary.
- Explains that euthanasia derives from the greek words eu meaning good and thanatosis, which means death. people can make their own decisions when they choose to die earlier.
- Opines that euthanasia is a last resort for people who want to die. the laws in place today protect people from corrupt doctors and prevent abuse.
- Explains that euthanasia saves time for people, who could ultimately be saved. hospitals try to keep their rooms filled to maximize profits and the people's families that must deal with the bills are not able to pay it off.
- Explains that medicare uses more than 50 billion dollars in doctor fees and bills since the department of health and human services runs it. insurance rates would decrease if euthanasia was legal.
- Opines that the hippocratic oath of a doctor/physician is to do no harm to your patients, but some forms of suffering are not even able to be suppressed or stopped along with the fact that death is still inevitable.
- Opines that the legalization of euthanasia and physician assisted suicide is an abomination to the government’s duty to protect its citizens.
- Opines that death should not be taken lightly, even though euthanasia sends a message that life is not worth living.
- Explains that doctors become powerful when they can perform euthanasia on patients. in the netherlands, there are 4,000 cases of involuntary
- Opines that terminally ill people should not be making such decisions in such a high stress environment.
- Explains that euthanasia can lead to slowing in medical advancements and fluctuating over healthcare costs. it would mean a massive cut on healthcare spending.
- Explains that euthanasia was used in the 40s by the nazis to get rid of any one they found undesirable: children and adults that were disabled. the lash back on the healthcare system is unmeasurable.
1334 wordsRead More - Euthanasia Persuasive Essayexplanatory essayEuthanasia is the act of ending a person’s life through lethal injection or through the removement of treatment. Euthanasia comes from the Greek word meaning “good death.” When a death ends peacefully, it is recognized as a good death. In modern society, euthanasia has come to mean a death free of any pain and anxiety brought on through the use of medication; this can also be called mercy killing, deliberately ending someone’s life in order to end an individual’s suffering. Anything that would ease human suffering is good. Euthanasia eases human suffering. Therefore, euthanasia is good. Because active euthanasia is considered as suicide or murder, it is a very controversial issue and therefore, illegal in most places. Although there are always
In this essay, the author
- Explains that euthanasia is the act of ending a person’s life through lethal injection or through the removal of treatment.
- Explains the different types of euthanasia: passive, active, physician assisted, voluntary, and involuntary.
- Explains that the euthanasia debate has a long history, and states tried to create laws to allow physician assisted suicide, but each time it was defeated.
- States that the netherlands legalized euthanasia in 2001 for terminally ill patients ages 12 and up, and luxembourg legallyized both in 2008.
- Explains that the quality of palliative care is determined by the doctor, not the legalization of euthanasia.
- Opines that improving palliative care will not get rid of euthanasia requests, but instead, prolong the requests.
- Explains that the slippery slope argument has been ongoing in the euthanasia debate.
- Explains that patients request euthanasia because they are terminally ill, and if there is no cure to stop their suffering, a patient might request it.
- Explains that euthanasia has many benefits, but it is being abused; many people who don't want to live anymore or have psychological disorders are requesting for it.
1380 wordsRead More - Right to Dieanalytical essayThe word “Euthanasia” originates from the Greek language and translated it means good “death”. Today, it is the act of ending another person’s life at their request, to minimize their suffering. There is much debate on whether this practice should be legal and the moral implications behind this choice. If you have the right to live, should you also have the right to choose how you die? Support for euthanasia has been dated back to the Ancient Greek and Roman cultures in 16th century. Today, only 42 percent of Americans support euthanasia and 22 percent are unsure (Ertelt, 2010). Back in the 1970’s, a movement known as the “Right to Die” Movement began to move towards legalizing euthanasia (Yount, 12). Currently legal assisted suicide is only allowed in four states across the United States and is against the law otherwise. Legal physician-assisted suicide, or euthanasia, should be a right for terminally ill patients as it provides the freedom of choice, is a humane way to allow the terminally ill to die without immense pain and suffering, and will lessen the financial burden for families and the healthcare system.
In this essay, the author
- Explains that legal assisted suicide is against the law in the state of new york. legalized euthanasia would lower the cost of end-of-life care.
- Argues that euthanasia is a right for terminally ill patients as it provides the freedom of choice to decide their course of treatment and the ability to choose when to end their life.
- Argues that legalizing assisted suicide would lead to legalized murder and abuse of the system.
- Cites ertelt, s., hartocollis, a. and pasternak. the third rail of u.s. health care policy.
1265 wordsRead More - Assisted Suicideanalytical essayIn the dictionary definition of euthanasia it describes it as an act of causing death painlessly, so as to end suffering. The actual word comes from two Greek words whose literal meaning is “well death”. Euthanasia has come a long way from its history, to the Sacred Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, to the present day Vatican City in February 2000 and to the many different reflections on it from all different people. Euthanasia is a very controversial topic that has been addressed many different times.
In this essay, the author
- Explains that euthanasia is an act of causing death painlessly, so as to end suffering. it has come a long way from its history, to the sacred congregation for the doctrine of the faith, and the vatican city in february 2000.
- Explains that euthanasia has been practiced throughout history and in many different cultures.
- States that pope john paul ii approved the declaration on may 5, 1980 at the vatican.
- Analyzes the declaration on euthanasia, which states that human life is a gift of god's love and that suicide, abortion, and euthanasy is as wrong as murder.
- Quotes fr. frank pavone, the national director of the priests for life organization, who firmly stands against euthanasia. he argues that life is not only valuable when it is healthy, but valuable all the time.
- Opines that euthanasia is not a topic to be taken lightly. everyone always wishes that they will die peacefully but no one knows how they are going to die.
- Analyzes how the declaration concludes that life is a gift from god and that death is unavoidable. pope john paul ii issued another strong condemnation of abortion and euthanasia in february 200
- Explains that the hemlock society wants to legalize euthanasia. they believe that life, liberty, and pursuit of happiness are inalienable rights.
1411 wordsRead More - The Ethics of Physician Assisted Deathopinionated essayEuthanasia is a Greek word meaning a “good death” (Schiavo, 2011). This word is usually referred to the manner of ending an individual’s life in relief of pain and suffering. Although some people may disagree, euthanasia and physician-assi...
In this essay, the author
- Explains that hippocrates wrote the phrase "i will not give a drug that is deadly to anyone if asked for it" in his oath, which is an ethical code for physicians to uphold and apply in their profession.
- Explains that euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide can be used interchangeably. there are two ways of endangerment, passive and active.
- Explains the mechanism of action of barbiturates, which inhibits the activities of a neurotransmitter called gamma-amino butyric acid (gaba).
- Opines that it is not unethical to watch patients die from a terminal illness if they have done everything that they could to save him.
- Argues that the hippocratic oath does not have a passage stating that physicians must reserve medical treatments to the people who need it the most.
- Argues that there are arguments against physician-assisted suicide that seem persuasive as the arguments for the procedure.
- Opines that the hippocratic oath prohibits physicians from inflicting any harm on patients.
- States that washington, oregon, and montana have all legalized physician aid in dying (pad). active euthanasia is illegal in the united states, but pad is allowed in some states.
- Analyzes how the plaintiffs argued that individual dignities are violated when individuals are not allowed to exercise their consciences and convictions.
- States judge mccarter of montana first judicial district court listened to both arguments and considered the different issues. the state appealed the case and the supreme court granted certiorari.
- Explains that while the bill of rights protects an individual from self-incrimination, it does not provide protection from one’s self destruction. physician assisted suicide and physician aid in dying has been outlawed by many states, but washington, oregon, and montana legalized pad.
- Opines that patients should not be allowed to seek lethal medications from physicians. active and passive euthanasia and pad are the "acts" and the offense punishable by law is the aid in ending one's life
- Opines that some physicians abandon their code of ethics and perform illegal euthanasia.
- Explains that it is difficult to hold someone strictly to one set of codes, but ethically sound minds always make the best decisions. physicians must be ethical but have a flexible mindset reserved for difficult situations.
- Analyzes newman's article making the final choice: should physician assisted suicide be legalized? truth seeker, pp.
- Cites robert baxter et al v. state of montana, mt da 09-0051, 2009 (montana supreme court).
- Cites schiavo, t. (2011, july 1). euthanasia.com. retrieved july 15, 2011.
- Describes the original version of the hippocratic oath, which can be found at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/hippocratic.
- Swears by apollo the physician, aesculapius the surgeon, hygeia and panacea, and calls all the gods and goddesses to witness that they will observe and keep this underwritten oath.
- Opines that they will reverence their master who taught them the art, allow him things necessary for his support, and consider his sons as brothers.
- Explains that they will devise and order for the sick the best diet, according to their judgment and means. they will take care to heal them.
- Opines that no man's entreaty will prevail upon them to administer poison to anyone, nor will they counsel any man to do so. they will get no medicine to pregnant women, with a view to destroy the child.
- Opines that they will not cut for the stone, but will commit that affair to the surgeons.
- Opines that whatever house they may enter, their visit shall be for the convenience and advantage of the patient, and they will willingly refrain from doing any injury or wrong from falsehood and from acts of an amorous nature.
- Explains that whatever they may see or hear in the course of their practice, if it be not proper to repeat it, they will keep sacred and secret within their own breast.
- Opines that if i faithfully observe this oath, may i prosper and prosper in my fortune and profession, and live in the estimation of posterity.
3138 wordsRead More